Pornography

Don't whimper and expose your belly so soon. I'm not offended, just toying with your self-rightousness.

sweet pentax:
Isn't it?
 
In order for you to know the look on their faces you would have had to sample quite a number of hired help so what is it you do not condone?

Degrading acts, acts which are either typically considered filthy or even unhealthy...such as eating excrement{yummmmmm}


they do not need you to condone their behaviour.

I detest all stupid and poorly thought out behaviour.


You have strong feelings against porn so I will assume you stay away from it, not purchasing magazines, avoiding it on the net and not paying for sex.

Wrong...I'm making a distinction between objectively degrading acts and explicit sex acts.
It's very easy to talk about this on net, but I'd be extremely surprised if you would ever attempt to justify your support of degrading acts in front of a group of educated adults.

You, like most others here assume that any criticism of porn is based on a dislike of porn, yet, I've consistenly pointed out that I'm against the degrading acts.
Anyone who gives moral support to people who want to eat biological waste or a biological product destined for the vagina is a bit loopy.

Since this thread is about porn and the mind isn't it safe to say that even if the images of debauched sex were not available for viewing they would still exist and play themselves out in the mind?

Well, no....I've never had any fantasies where I eat semen or shit, perhaps you do, that's your problem.


What is meaningful and productive about sex?

It feels good.

What's meaningful and productive about going for a swim on a hot day?

It feels good.
 
Don't whimper and expose your belly so soon. I'm not offended, just toying with your self-rightousness

Xev

So eating semen and shit is morally justifiable....LOL, thanks for exposing yourself as wholly brainwashed.
As soon as you scientism/empiricism freaks get a wiff of anything that has an attachment to religion, you shit your pants and go on the offensive.
 
David:
So eating semen and shit is morally justifiable....LOL, thanks for exposing yourself as wholly brainwashed.

No, 'tard - I don't subscribe to moralistic interpretations of the world.
I am a heathen.

As soon as you scientism/empiricism freaks get a wiff of anything that has an attachment to religion, you shit your pants and go on the offensive.

*Chortles*
Scientism? Me?
That's a good one. That's almost as funny as watching you attempt to look smart.

Do you honestly think you fool anyone? That "I date ladies, not whores" is something besides the most obvious cover for not being able to get any ass whatsoever? Or that your contempt for the female sex isn't obviously rooted in the above?
Do you have any idea how utterly funny you are?
 
Last edited:
Evasion.
You can't even stick to an argument, you fallacious twit. You ascribe to me arguments I've never made, and ignore the gist of everything written to you.
You don't have a goddamned thing to say, and all those attempts to make that nothing sound good just look like glitter on shit.
 
Quote:I'm making a distinction between objectively degrading acts and explicit sex acts.It's very easy to talk about this on net, but I'd be extremely surprised if you would ever attempt to justify your support of degrading acts in front of a group of educated adults.

Since I am an adult I need not justify my actions but we are not speaking of any of my sexual proclivities.

Quote: Anyone who gives moral support to people who want to eat biological waste or a biological product destined for the vagina is a bit loopy

What moral support? They recquire no support and I do not find paraphilia a moral issue. What I find interesting is your outrage against something no one had mentioned not even in the opening thread. It is you who introduced and remained fixated on the 'bizarre'.
You say pleasure is the productive meaning behind sex well what is pleasing to you is obviously not pleasing to others.
 
Just out of curiosity Dave do you perform cunnilingus on your ladies? Do they ever go loopy on your rod? I mean someone who considers the biological excretions so unpleasent must really avoid 'tasting'. Do you condone kissing with all that spit swapping involved?

..."here we go loop de loop,
here we go loop de ly,
here we go loop de loop all on a Saturday night"
 
Xev bunny.

I'm someone who tells the truth, the FULL TRUTH, as such, this forces people to do a subconscious psychological profile on me, ie, they are forced to psychologically defend themselves against my truths at a subconscious level and retaliate with "rationalizations" against my FULL TRUTHS, truths which they've recognized as threatening{but only at a subconscious level}.

I don't coverse with people who become my psychological prisioners as the basis of their capture is fear of TRUTH, it would be a complete waste of time.

This is why I made the post on critical thinking and rational discourse...this post either attracts truthseekers or repells truthhaters.
 
Just out of curiosity Dave do you perform cunnilingus on your ladies? Do they ever go loopy on your rod? I mean someone who considers the biological excretions so unpleasent must really avoid 'tasting'. Do you condone kissing with all that spit swapping involved?

OPEN WIDE LUCY, I've got a full load of truth to splatter all over your face...LOL.
 
This truth David is your truth. As you have outlined there are those in the world who do not live by your truth. The idea of a "full truth" is a lot of bullshit unless you are prepared to enlighten the rest of us on what this 'ultimate' universal truth may be. Sex is too complex to try and force your idea of pleasure on others nevermind your truth. And since when has desire been rational? As Dante once asked "Who let desire pull reason from her throne?" Well passion and an unrelenting sex drive did.
 
Quote:OPEN WIDE LUCY, I've got a full load of truth to splatter all over your face...LOL.
Davey there are a lot of variables to be considered before I know if I would be open to that...but hey, you never know.
 
David:
I'm someone who tells the truth, the FULL TRUTH, as such, this forces people to do a subconscious psychological profile on me, ie, they are forced to psychologically defend themselves against my truths at a subconscious level and retaliate with "rationalizations" against my FULL TRUTHS, truths which they've recognized as threatening{but only at a subconscious level}.

That's nice. Perhaps this compensates for the lack of power and accomplishment in your life.
I rather don't hope so.

You're someone who can't argue. When asked a set of simple questions, you squeal like a little bitch and start ascribing to your questioner arguments that they've never made for practices they don't indulge in.

Although your prurient interest in such practices is telling.
 
Sex is too complex to try and force your idea pleasure on others nevermind your truth

You're right, this is why I accept categories of human behaviour, but not anything goes in these categories.

Cite a peer reviewed paper from an established medical journal which affirms the value of eating feces?

We can use science and reason to include or exclude certain behaviours and look for widespread support.
 
*Laughs*
No, you can only spew gibberish using faulty methods of reasoning.

Don't like the challenge to your ideas?
Unable to take the idea that reason might be just as arbitrary as emotion, or that morality is just as arbitrary?
Don't question, little sheep! Better yet to cover your ears and obfuscate.

You are what Varg Vikernes described as a "sheep in wolves clothing". You like to feign superiourity to the herd, but you're just as docile as they are.

But please, don't "refuse to argue". There's no need for a man covered in filth to take the high moral ground, and you're providing some excellent entertainment for me.
 
Don't like the challenge to your ideas?

Xev

What challenge...you're either neutral or pro-hardcore pornography and anyone who challenges YOU is written off as self-righteous, and this terminates rational debate.

Unable to take the idea that reason might be just as arbitrary as emotion, or that morality is just as arbitrary?

Thinking and feeling co-define each other, but there's nothing arbitary about knowing that feces is biological waste, and that the body expelled it as it was toxic, in fact, some cancer researchers believe in auto-intoxication via the toxic waste in the colon.

And you want to support or demand neutrality on eating feces and try and pass it off as a form of sex, LOL, it's by any definition a form of pathological behaviour.
 
Quote:We can use science and reason to include or exclude certain behaviours and look for widespread support.

I understand that there is behaviour you find abhorrent and would never indulge in but to look for 'widespread support'...well I just find that very evangical.
 
Quote: And you want to support or demand neutrality on eating feces and try and pass it off as a form of sex, LOL, it's by any definition a form of pathological behaviour.

No one is supporting ANYTHING. Some people include waste in their sex play and that is there perogative...if they drop dead from it that is their problem, their consequence. The practitioners of the behaviour you describe are probably better informed of the risk than we are so....
Hey did you know Chuck Berry indulges in the bizarre. Yes indeedy, he made quite a few home videos it seems and his very special treat were blond girls excreting in his mouth. Didn't kill him.
 
Pornography is great!

Now coprophilia is certainly not to my taste. Nor is analingus. But if others want to participate, that is their business. The risk benefit analysis is up to them.

I like kissing, but the human mouth can be pretty disgusting. I wouldn't want to kiss a girl with poor oral hygiene that bordered on gum disease.

If you don't like these acts, don't participate. Don't like to watch them, don't get that kind of porn. I'm partial to solo girl / girl on girl videos myself. No guy butt.

If you can't get something, you'd better find a way to live without it.
 
Back
Top