superstring01
Moderator
. . . somebody shoulda' been a lawyer.
[compliment intended, Tiassa]
~String
[compliment intended, Tiassa]
~String
I dunno I'm watching this story pretty closely. Seems like the usual smokescreen B.S that's surrounded this guy from day 1. Very convenient to have to lose the body so fast.
Third, Osama bin Laden has had over nine years to pipe up and say, "Uh, guys? Hey, I didn't do this. Ain't got nothin' to do with me."
Osama denies hand
By B. Muralidhar Reddy
ISLAMABAD, SEPT. 12. The Saudi fugitive, Osama bin Laden, described as `America's number one enemy', has denied any involvement in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon but maintained that he fully supported such `daring attacks'.
Osama, in a message purportedly sent through a special representative to the Pakistani Urdu daily, Ausaf, has been quoted as saying that the attacks were a ``reaction of a suppressed people against repression''. http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/2001/09/13/stories/01130007.htm
September 16, 2001: Bin Laden Denies Involvement in 9/11 Attacks
Confirming earlier reports [Reuters, 9/13/2001] , bin Laden denies any involvement in the 9/11 attacks. In a statement to Al Jazeera, he states, “I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons.” [CNN, 9/17/2001] The US claims that he confesses his role in a video message two months later, but the contents of that video are highly disputed.
September 28, 2001: Bin Laden Again Denies Involvement in 9/11 Attacks
Bin Laden says in an interview, “I have already said that I am not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States (see September 16, 2001). As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other human beings as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of battle.… The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the US system but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology can survive. They may be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the US itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups capable of causing large-scale destruction. Then you cannot forget the American Jews, who have been annoyed with President Bush ever since the Florida elections and who want to avenge him.… Then there are intelligence agencies in the US, which require billions of dollars worth of funds from Congress and the government every year.… They needed an enemy.… Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked who carried out the attacks.” [Daily Ummat (Karachi), 9/28/2001]
December 26, 2001: Bin Laden Again Denies 9/11 Involvement, but Praises Hijackers
Osama bin Laden making his “Nineteen Students” speech.Osama bin Laden making his “Nineteen Students” speech. [Source: Al Jazeera]Osama bin Laden makes a new video statement about 9/11, again denying the US has enough evidence against him to warrant an attack on Afghanistan (see September 16, 2001 and September 28, 2001), which he calls “a vicious campaign based on mere suspicion.” However, in what Professor Bruce Lawrence calls “his most extended and passionate celebration of the hijackers of 9/11,” he praises the 19 who carried out “the blessed strikes against global unbelief and its leader America.” He says of the hijackers, “It was not nineteen Arab states that did this deed. It was not Arab armies or ministries who humbled the oppressor who harms us in Palestine and elsewhere. It was nineteen post-secondary school students—I beg Allah almighty to accept them—who shook America’s throne, struck its economy right in the heart, and dealt the biggest military power a mighty blow, by the grace of Allah Almighty.” He continues by saying that the hijackers “are the people who have given up everything for the sake of ‘There is no Allah but Allah.’” He also criticizes Israel’s occupation of Palestine, and suggests that Israel is trying to expand its borders to Medina, currently in Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden also attacks the sanctions against Iraq, which he notes have resulted in “the murder of over a million children.” [Laden, 2005, pp. 145-157] Bin Laden’s left arm appears to be injured in the video, fueling speculation he was wounded in the battle for Afghanistan [CNN, 7/23/2002] No new videotapes of Bin Laden speaking are released for nearly three years after this (see October 29, 2004). [BBC, 10/30/2004]
The problem is how do you separate fact from fiction? Which is the real Osama? The one who spoke to journalists in India and Pakistan or the one who spoke to reporters of strings reading list?
Whoa hold up (Stop Sign) they lost Osama's body?, have they checked behind the fridge or down the side of the sofa, or in their other jacket pocket?
At any rate, it doesn't matter what any of us believes anymore, let's hope this is an attempt to close this ridiculous chapter of U.S History.
Who said its one man? I said there are at least three OBLs on video, so which one was killed? And if he has been pronounced dead nine times so far, will he be competing with Elvis for sightings? Or will he/they stay dead?
This has a very The Boys From Brazil feel to it. I have a feeling a video will turn up soon
Who has pronounced him dead? The americans have only done so once and that's what counts. Why did you never question the rumor that he was already dead? Why didn't you ask for the death certificate? Body? Marker in the ground? What its only when the U.S military says he's dead that you question its veracity?
The americans have only done so once and that's what counts.
Considering the high levels of gullibility of people who endorse extrajudicial killings as though they were an advancement of their rights rather than a regression, I have a feeling, this is just the beginning
Who said its one man? I said there are at least three OBLs on video, so which one was killed? And if he has been pronounced dead nine times so far, will he be competing with Elvis for sightings? Or will he/they stay dead?
This has a very The Boys From Brazil feel to it. I have a feeling a video will turn up soon
(Chris Matthews was just exploring this question on his show, and one point that emerges is the idea that in a state known for its intrusive government, the idea that a notorious criminal suspect could move into a newly-built, unusual compound in a garrison town, a hundred yards from a military facility, and nobody in that government noticed, is kind of silly on its face. The only real question is how high up the chain of command that knowledge, nod, and wink went.)
The United States needs to relinquish custody of the terrorists from Guantanamo Bay to China. They would handle them "properly"!
Of course it's still the beginning of the battle against religious tyranny and totalitarianism.
In the US Army manual on counterinsurgency, the American commander General David Petraeus describes Afghanistan as a "war of perception . . . conducted continuously using the news media". What really matters is not so much the day-to-day battles against the Taliban as the way the adventure is sold in America where "the media directly influence the attitude of key audiences". Reading this, I was reminded of the Venezuelan general who led a coup against the democratic government in 2002. "We had a secret weapon," he boasted. "We had the media, especially TV. You got to have the media."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/10/war-media-propaganda-iraq-lies
Of course, but to people outside the US Americans appear exceptionally gullible and stupid in what they choose to believe.
They are probably the only country in the world who demonstrate against healthcare while celebrating extrajudicial killing. That doesn't speak well of their critical thinking faculties.
Actually it is a battle of perceptions.
But who wins such battles? In India we have a saying, you don't bore a hole into the plate from which you are eating. So yes, I think there is a battle, but everyone loses