News From Gaza

Status
Not open for further replies.
24. If American, invade a defenceless nation. Because China and Russia can fight back

China and Russia don't fuck with the U.S. because the Big Dog Bite's, they get their bitches to do it for them.

And you still don't have a honest answer do you?
 
I don't see China and Russia doing anything here, its the Americans fighting losing battles against defenceless nations.

I mean, you're going broke in Iraq, which has NOTHING. What would you do against a real military power?
 
I don't see China and Russia doing anything here, its the Americans fighting losing battles against defenceless nations.

I mean, you're going broke in Iraq, which has NOTHING. What would you do against a real military power?

And you still don't have a honest answer do you?

The question is still the same, as always, and you can't give a honest answer, can you, all you have is non sequitur replies.

Still trying to change the subject, because you are pathologically dishonest.

So even if the Americans's are guilty of everything that you claim of them, and I am guilty of everything you accuse me of?

Does that make it right? Moslems Killing Moslems, murdering Innocent Moslems, in the name of driving out the so called occupiers?

Killing innocents who don't want to become Moslem?

Reducing them to second class citizen in their own lands?

Does that make it right?

Moslems Killing Moslems.

Moslems murdering innocent people around the world?
 
Personally, I hope McCain wins and you spend the next 100 years in knee deep shit. That would be justice.
 
Personally, I hope McCain wins and you spend the next 100 years in knee deep shit. That would be justice.

non sequitur

Now here's a solution to the problem:

Originally Posted by Norsefire
Now, of course, Lebanon is a sovereign state. However, many people consider it a part of Syria, primarly Greater Syria or al-Sham, including myself.

If we examine the history of Lebanon, it was only a product of European colonalism, and before then it was not a sovereign state. The same goes to many ME'ern nations (excluding Syria)

In reality, Lebanon, as well as Jordan, the Holy Land, and Western Iraq, are all part of Syria


Would you agree with that statement?

I was thinking, perhaps it should all be given back to the Persians? Or split it up, Rome can rule a portion, Greece another, Egypt a bit, Persia some....
 
Personally, I hope McCain wins and you spend the next 100 years in knee deep shit. That would be justice.

You know personally, I would rather be knee deep in shit, than on my Knees to Islam.

There is no justice in Islam, you have taught me that.
 
More diversions. Give the US back to native Americans and we can talk.

Now back to Gaza [the topic of the thread]

How "Israel" practices "democracy"

As a Palestinian from the Gaza Strip, I could not have been more proud to learn last June that I had earned a prestigious Fulbright Scholarship to study in the United States.

As a child, I would wonder how televisions, computers and washing machines actually worked. I took this fascination to the Islamic University of Gaza, the only Gazan university offering a degree in electrical engineering. There, I developed an ECG monitoring system that enables patients' hearts to be monitored at home through a personal computer and an Internet link. I won the university prize for distinguished projects for my innovation. I long dreamed of the other advances I might make after an education at the University of Connecticut, where I was scheduled to study this fall for a master's degree in electrical engineering.

Now, my dream has been stolen from me. I am devastated; my parents heartbroken. Though Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip in 2005, it still controls our borders and determines who and what enters or exits. Since a 2006 election that brought a Hamas majority to the Palestinian Legislative Council, Israel has steadily diminished access into and out of Gaza. Many Palestinians reportedly died in the past year because they could not leave to obtain medical care they desperately needed. Food, fuel and medicine are scarce. Hundreds of students like me, with scholarships to study abroad, are being arbitrarily denied the right to leave Gaza to fulfill our educational aspirations.

A few weeks ago when I went to the Erez Checkpoint between Gaza and Israel, I was told by the Israeli official that I could not leave unless I collaborated with the Israeli occupation. I refused. My conscience and my people's right to freedom and equal rights mean more to me than even the finest education.

U.S. officials came to my aid. They held special visa interviews along the Israeli-Gaza border for me and two other Fulbright scholars in a similar position. The U.S. granted my visa. Once again I could imagine taking my seat in a lecture hall in America. I packed my bags, bought souvenirs for my future friends in America and bade farewell to my family.

Then came a phone call that changed everything. My American visa had been revoked based on secret evidence provided by Israel. I cannot see the evidence and so have no opportunity to contest it.

What carrot did an Israeli security official dangle before another Gazan's eyes, or what torture tactics did he use to manufacture information he could use against me? However it happened, and for whatever reason, the outcome is the same. Despite my abhorrence of violence, I am being penalized.

What troubles me most, however, is not my own personal plight, but the effect this experience has had on my talented younger brother.

After watching what I have endured as an innocent and politically unaffiliated student, he has concluded that he will no longer pursue the educational dream outside of Gaza he once held. His horizons are closing.

As an older brother from a family that places deep value on education, it pains me to see his own ambitions falter, even temporarily, because of the injustice I am facing.

I wonder what hopelessness all children in Gaza suffer when they learn that Gaza's best students are confined by Israel to the cramped Gaza Strip? And how are they to succeed when this week their parents discover local stores are empty of study essentials such as pencils, pens and notebooks because of the economic blockade of our small parcel of land?

http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/commentary/hc-commentaryabushaban0831.artaug31,0,1352352.story


Empty words from Americans, who continue to support this apartheid state:

Individual students -- 58 so far this summer, according to Israel -- have been permitted to leave to study overseas. But Daya, the coordinator of Gaza's trapped student committee, estimates that at least 600 have been accepted to foreign universities. That number, he said, is probably low and doesn't take into account a new dynamic: students with ambitions to study abroad who didn't bother to apply.

The plight of Gaza's students drew unusually direct comments from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in May.

"If you cannot engage young people and give them a complete horizon to their expectations and to their dreams, then I don't know that there would be any future for Palestine," she said.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-fg-students31-2008aug31,0,6745813.story


Gaza fishermen to be accompanied by human rights workers to avoid aggression by European Jews occupying their lands

The Free Gaza Movement reported on Sunday that human rights workers, members of the movement and members of the International Solidarity Movement launched a campaign to monitor the aggression of the Israeli Navy against Palestinian fishermen in Gaza. On Monday morning, the human rights workers will accompany the fishermen.

http://www.imemc.org/article/56784
 
More diversions. Give the US back to native Americans and we can talk.

Now back to Gaza [the topic of the thread]

How "Israel" practices "democracy"



http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/commentary/hc-commentaryabushaban0831.artaug31,0,1352352.story


Empty words from Americans, who continue to support this apartheid state:


http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-fg-students31-2008aug31,0,6745813.story


Gaza fishermen to be accompanied by human rights workers to avoid aggression by European Jews occupying their lands



http://www.imemc.org/article/56784

Why you canged the direction of the thread.

And even in Gaza, the question still remaines:

So even if the Americans's are guilty of everything that you claim of them, and I am guilty of everything you accuse me of?

Does that make it right? Moslems Killing Moslems, murdering Innocent Moslems, in the name of driving out the so called occupiers?

Killing innocents who don't want to become Moslem?

Reducing them to second class citizen in their own lands?

Does that make it right?

Moslems Killing Moslems.

Moslems murdering innocent people around the world?
 
CheskiChips said:
I will make a deal with you Vkothii. After you live there
When you say "live there", you mean: "as a non-Arab and a non-Jew, as an 'outsider' who will be perceived by both sides as someone who doesn't 'understand' the problems"?

Or should I just find some farmland and claim it as a non-Israeli, non-Palestinian; i.e. because it's there and I want it? Can I shoot a few people too, can I, huh? How many bullets should I bring with?
 
I assume by 1967 border you mean pre-Sinai war.
Yes, but there could be mutually agreed adjustments.

... a strong military in Israel is needed since its neighbors continually attack it. Not just neighbors, but with moderate frequency Arab states attack Israel. If the military became week...you would definitely seen arab invasion.
Yes that is true about having hostile neighbors. They have reasons also to be mad at Israel. The conflict has been going on 60 years and Israel has taken land they considered to be theirs. Israel has killed them with about a 20 to one ratio. If that stopped for more than a decade, pehaps fewer would be willing to become walking bombs, etc. The mine fields along the border I suggested would also help keep the terroist out.
Not because it desires to exand, if anything it's given up more land than gained.
They do not see it that way. True the captured Sanai was returned, and it is larger than Israel is now. They see it more like a robber returning part of what has been taken by supperior force. The current state of war is costly for both, especially Israel's enemies. If Israel did practice the defensive option instead of the high-kill-ratio option for a decade or so, the economy of the Palestinians would greatly improve (and Israel's also) so the Palestinians would have more to live for, be less willing to blow themselves up, I would think. It seems worth a try, especially as the basic idea is to reduce the deaths on BOTH sides. The current policy is a clear failure and in a decade or two the susuide bombers will be spreading Ebola etc. not just killing a few at a bus stop.

...You need to realize Israel is not fighting a war, they are fight a bunch of terrorists who seem to take random unorganized actions. You can't fight them; they will randomly at work take out an AK47 and start shooting people. They will be walking home from their mosque and pick up their gun and run into a synagogue. They will be working with a tractor and randomly start running over people. After years of knowing their friends they will come to work with a bomb strapped to their chest. If a man is walking through their portion of a city they will harass them...and if they yell back everyone will get togeather and kill them by stomping their faces in. Their children are mean, and will throw explosives at IDF soldiers (that could cause harm) as a prank. If you live in cities like Chevron, they sneak in your house to murder you at night. Their children throw rocks at your children and you while their parents laugh.
I do not doubt that what you state is true, but they could say the same about Israel, and in fact Israel is killing more, destroying more etc. than they are. (I admit this is mainly because they can not do as much, not a statement of their lesser thrust for "blood of the enemy.")

You bring up a good point - the attack from within - That is a problem with my plan. - You are the first to do so. Thank you. Of course all societies have this problem to some extent. In the US when someone enters a school, wips out a couple of guns and starts firing, normally it is someone who has been rejected by his peers. In the US , we have a leagal right to "bear arms." In Israel, one thing one could do is to seal off some areas and make very complete search for illegal weapons. - Again using technology to help - the stuff used at airports to detect faint traces of explosives with chemical cloth wipes etc. Also it would be worth it to offer rewards (Bring in a gun, get cash - not ID taken etc. Even have PO box for the reward when a tip correctly tells where a weapon is hidden, etc. - I do not live there so bet people who do can suggest better ideas to reduce the threat from within.) Again, if Israel were perceived as trying to be just, paid for homes taken years ago, etc. trying only to defend itself, I think that would do a lot to reduce the danger from within.

Nothing is going to be 100% a success or quick. The real question for me, is which option will reduce the deaths. Even if only Israeli deaths are counted, I think the defensive approach will, in contrast to a future where Israel is up against Ebolia etc. is being spread for high rise windows etc.

...The missiles being shot of the borders are really not that bad, Israel would shoot them down but it's just not financially possible at present. None of it is relavent since they rarely kill anybody, they just make life annoying.
I tend to agree. They are really crude ineffective weapons that mainly make the terrorist feel good to be "striking back," but it would cost only a few bullets for a CIWS to shoot them down and certainly worth couple of dozen artillery shells to "shred any living thing" that is at the lauch point 30 second, or less, after the first is launched. Note that the development of such an integrated, radar-controlled, counter-fire artillery system would be good for dealing with more conventional invasions also. (They do not come out of no where- Israel could move equipment before it happens.)

I think Israel should stay strong - have war games etc. as the US and Europeans do. Keep developing first-line world-class fighter jets and tanks etc. (Brazil has bought some tanks and soon will replace a lot ot its fighters. I.e. sell this stuff too.) Just stop killing "the enemy" so much more than he is killing Israelis. The number of innocent sub-teenagers killed by Israel exceeds all Israeli deaths. This is not just or even wise in the long run. If Israel continues this High-Kill-Ratio policy thur its seventh decade, I think it highly likely that in the eight decade Israel will be fighting an enemy making biological war on Israel. Is that where you want Israel to be? Or is it time to change from "more of the same"?

Let think more about Israeli's future than tomorrow or next month. Israel will never kill all the arabs - present policy is just increasing the number who will willing die to hurt Israel and the funds / modern technology made available to them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, but there could be mutually agreed adjustments.

Yes that is true about having hostile neighbors. They have reasons also to be mad at Israel. The conflict has been going on 60 years and Israel has taken land they considered to be theirs. Israel has killed them with about a 20 to one ratio. If that stopped for more than a decade, pehaps fewer would be willing to become walking bombs, etc. The mine fields along the border I suggested would also help keep the terroist out.
They do not see it that way. True the captured Sanai was returned, and it is larger than Israel is now. They see it more like a robber returning part of what has been taken by supperior force. The current state of war is costly for both, especially Israel's enemies. If Israel did practice the defensive option instead of the high-kill-ratio option for a decade or so, the economy of the Palestinians would greatly improve (and Israel's also) so the Palestinians would have more to live for, be less willing to blow themselves up, I would think. It seems worth a try, especially as the basic idea is to reduce the deaths on BOTH sides. The current policy is a clear failure and in a decade or two the susuide bombers will be spreading Ebola etc. not just killing a few at a bus stop.
A small history lesson that is too often ignored:

2 Maps of Colonization.
http://www.unitedjerusalem.com/HISTORICAL_PERSPECTIVES/Maps_and_History/map2.gif

http://www.unitedjerusalem.com/HISTORICAL_PERSPECTIVES/Maps_and_History/map3.gif

"The U.N. Resolution 181 partition plan was to divide the remaining 25% of Palestine into a Jewish Palestinian State and a SECOND Arab Palestinian State (Trans-Jordan being the first) based upon population concentration. The Jews accepted --- the Arabs rejected. They still wanted ALL. On May 14, 1948 the Palestinian Jews finally declared their own State of Israel"

-1948 Borders after 1948 War of Independence, when Egypt, Trans-Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq invaded the country.
mapHistWar1947.jpg


After the 1948 these were the armistice lines. Note that the aggressors lost land.
http://www.unitedjerusalem.com/HIST...ael_Wars_Maps___History/MapWarHistARM1949.jpg


Squads from Egypt kept entering (in undeclared war) into Israel from Sinai and killing civilians and attacking military personal. Thus Israel invades Sinai. (After 2 years of their undeclared war)
Map1956WarHist.jpg


Egypt violates the armistice agreements by rolling military into Sinai.
Note that Syria and Jordan and Lebanon all attacked Israel when Israel attacked Egypt. This caused the annexation of their lands (in the north).
Map1967WarHist.jpg


" Egypt and Syria launched a coordinated surprise assault against Israel (6 October 1973), with the Egyptian army crossing the Suez Canal and Syrian troops penetrating the Golan Heights. " On Israel's holiest day of the year.
http://www.unitedjerusalem.com/HISTORICAL_PERSPECTIVES/Israel_Wars_Maps___History/Map1973WarHist.jpg

This is the land in question, it was never questioned by Lebanon, not until the PLO was it disputed.
http://www.unitedjerusalem.com/HIST...el_Wars_Maps___History/Map1982WarHist_jpg.jpg

You bring up a good point - the attack from within - That is a problem with my plan. - You are the first to do so. Thank you. Of course all societies have this problem to some extent. In the US when someone enters a school, wips out a couple of guns and starts firing, normally it is someone who has been rejected by his peers. In the US , we have a leagal right to "bear arms." In Israel, one thing one could do is to seal off some areas and make very complete search for illegal weapons. - Again using technology to help - the stuff used at airports to detect faint traces of explosives with chemical cloth wipes etc. Also it would be worth it to offer rewards (Bring in a gun, get cash - not ID taken etc. Even have PO box for the reward when a tip correctly tells where a weapon is hidden, etc. - I do not live there so bet people who do can suggest better ideas to reduce the threat from within.) Again, if Israel were perceived as trying to be just, paid for homes taken years ago, etc. trying only to defend itself, I think that would do a lot to reduce the danger from within.
The Israeli government has actually given more aid to palestinians kicked out of their homes than Israelis kicked out of their homes.
See expulsion of gush katif, only one of a couple- http://www.archive.org/details/gushkatifexpulsion
Is this not sad they are expelled from the home they desire again? Israeli government gave them nothing.
-Historical expulsions before Israel: http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/06/jewish-expulsion.html

The Arabs do not use guns most of the time to kill Jews in Israel. They send their children with hand explosive to throw at them. They use construction equipment, they slit their throats in the night. You don't hear about this in the news! Hear of Samir Kuntar, who by the way was given a heroes welcome in Lebanon!!!!!!! That piece of garbage, I would slit his throat if I saw him. Here's what he did...
According to the witnesses, when Kuntar's group found that the rubber boat they'd arrived in was disabled by gunfire, Kuntar shot Danny at close range in the back, in front of his daughter, and drowned him in the sea to ensure he was dead. Next, eyewitnesses said he smashed the head of 4 year-old Einat on beach rocks and crushed her skull with the butt of his rifle, Smadar Haran accidentally suffocated Yael to death while attempting to quiet her whimpering, which would have revealed their hiding place,[15][16] from where she saw Danny and Einat being led away at gunpoint by Kuntar. A policeman and two of Kuntar's comrades were killed in the shootout on the beach; Kuntar and the fourth member of the group, Ahmed Assad Abras, were captured. Abras was freed by Israel in the Jibril Agreement of May 1985.
THIS IS NOT UNCOMMON!! This is how they treat Jews in the Jewish land!!!



I tend to agree. They are really crude ineffective weapons that mainly make the terrorist feel good to be "striking back," but it would cost only a few bullets for a CIWS to shoot them down and certainly worth couple of dozen artillery shells to "shred any living thing" that is at the lauch point 30 second, or less, after the first is launched.
Israel attempts to do this. However the Palestinians intentionally shoot from school-yards, mosques, and heavily populated areas. Then have cameras waiting there after Israel bombs them. So it's very difficult, because these videos go to the news and no one explains that they just launched rockets from this location. It's a media propaganda war!


Let think more about Israeli's future than tomorrow or next month. Israel will never kill all the arabs - present policy is just increasing the number who will willing die to hurt Israel and the funds / modern technology made available to them.

Israel is currently prepared for biological warfare, and is distributing gas masks in Tel-Aviv, the epicenter for technology.
 
The UN has NO jurisdiction to give anyone's land to immigrants. The creation of Israel itself is an illegal colonial move.
 
The UN has NO jurisdiction to give anyone's land to immigrants. The creation of Israel itself is an illegal colonial move.

You are such a child, do you realize this? Grow up SAM and realize the world is not a simple place, things are not black and white. Mistakes in the past don't make valid mistakes in the present...peoples lives have value damn it. Maybe because you don't value your own life you're incapable of valuing others.:shrug:
 
Considering the occupation is ongoing, as is the oppression of native Palestinians by Jews coming in from around the world to their "God-given" land, its hardly a mistake in the past is it? "Israel" is a continuing mistake that has been very very costly to the people of Palestine, who's only crime was they lived in a place that fanatic Jews think God gave to them.

So if the UN gave the land back to Palestinians, the "Israelis" would go back to Europe and Russia? And the US, of course?
 
Personally, I think Israel, as a concept. is never, ever going to work as long as the justification for its existence is based on the exact same principles that the Nazis used (and they were only a recent example of a much older strategy). Jews ignore this particular elephant at their own peril - who cares if they look like a bunch of Aryan supremacists, who base their right to dispossess others on a concept that Hitler adopted fanatically?

As long as Jews from Europe see Palestine as 'belonging' to them, for no good reason anyone else can discern (especially if you're a Palestinian), Jews 'have' to be belligerent racists who look very much like Aryan Nazis (up close too), rather than 'an inspiration'. They look a lot more like a bunch of idiots who have given up trying to justify their racial supremacist ideology, and just shoot everyone - camera crews, reporters, UN personnel, oh and Arabs, lots and lots of Arabs.

The whole thing is actually sickening (like the Nazi tactics were) - that the West can acquiesce so readily to a continuation of racial supremacist 'rights', and what that means in terms of ongoing persecution.
Unfortunately for Jewish aspirations, the policy has not, despite all appearances of a stable state, a sovereignty of sorts, led to anything more than 60 years of unresolved conflict; this 'sovereignty' does not and has never existed except in some minds.
Some minds around the world have begun questioning the logic, the tactics, even what rights exactly do a bunch of refugees from Europe have? Only those they assign to themselves to turn another occupying people (who are not Jews) into refugees? What right do the new refugees have? None whatsoever, according to most Israelis, and Jews who don't even live there.

How is that a solution? It certainly isn't a final one, and it's never looked like being a solution to anything - it's really just the default strategy we humans have when it comes to fighting each other over resources.
 
Last edited:
Personally, I think Israel, as a concept. is never going to work as long as the justification for its existence is based on the exact same principles that the Nazis used (and they were only a recent example of a much older strategy).

As long as Jews from Europe see Palestine as 'belonging' to them, for no good reason anyone else can discern especially if you're a Palestinian, Jews 'have' to be belligerent racists who look very much like Aryan Nazis (up close too), rather than 'an inspiration'.

The whole thing is actually sickening - that the West can acquiesce so readily to a continuation of racial supremacist 'rights', and what that means in terms of ongoing persecution. Unfortunately for Jewish aspirations, the policy has not, despite all appearances of a stable state, a sovereignty of sorts, this does not and has never existed except in some minds. Some minds around the world have begun questioning the logic, the tactics, even what rights exactly do a bunch of refugees from Europe have? Only those they assign to themselves to turn another occupying people (who are not Jews) into refugees? What right do the new refugees have? None whatsoever, according to most Israelis, and Jews who don't even live there.

How is that a solution? It certainly isn't a final one, and it's never looked like being a solution to anything - it's really just the default strategy we humans have when it comes to fighting each other over resources.

Well you've got two options.

Let these people have the land they've been praying for, for at the least 1500 years.
Or
Exterminate them.

They will never give up.

Pick your choice.
 
Let these people have the land they've been praying for, for at the least 1500 years.

I'm sorry, since when is it anyone else's reponsibility to support your fanaticism? You've been praying for a land? Boo fricking hoo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top