They didn't want a safe place they wanted their promised land.
News From Gaza
- Thread starter S.A.M.
- Start date
- Status
maybe my history is a bit scarce, but as i recall pre 48 wasnt a good time to be a jew.
Which makes all the more fucking amazing the demanded land next to people who didn't like them.
i wasnt aware they had other land options, next to people who do like them.
Probably didn't but they never tried. And if you really want to get in deep their claim to the land in the mideast wasn't as strong as they made it out to be.
Here's the thing. The Jews in Europe were more or less told to fuck off somewhere, so they did.
Except that means the end of WWII is still waiting to happen. It ended in Europe, but the unwelcome Jews (who are not Semitic any more, because their genes have been diluted by centuries of intermarriage, if you apply the "rules" that were applied by European Jews to establish some sort of right to take land off the Arabs), have only shifted the war's denoument to another part of the world.
We're still waiting for WWII to end, which means we're still waiting for WWI to end (remember, Germany never surrendered, they only signed a ceasefire agreement). This goes way back to the 19th century, then.
Except that means the end of WWII is still waiting to happen. It ended in Europe, but the unwelcome Jews (who are not Semitic any more, because their genes have been diluted by centuries of intermarriage, if you apply the "rules" that were applied by European Jews to establish some sort of right to take land off the Arabs), have only shifted the war's denoument to another part of the world.
We're still waiting for WWII to end, which means we're still waiting for WWI to end (remember, Germany never surrendered, they only signed a ceasefire agreement). This goes way back to the 19th century, then.
Well no shit, Sherlocke. Obviously these conflicts have deep roots, why not take it all the way back to the primordial era if you can't let bygones be bygones? What is the "denouement" to WWII supposed to be? The Jews' former European oppressors donate a sizeable portion of their land to the Jews as compensation for the catastrophes Europe created, along with financial compensation, and the Jews use the money to build a safe homeland in Europe?
No, if I were those Euros, I'd say: "why don't you go back where you came and clear the land again - you know of all those people that will need to be moved on if you want room to live", while thinking: "this will be good, for us anyways" .
Apparently, the advice was well received, but not by the people who got moved on.
Apparently, the advice was well received, but not by the people who got moved on.
Message? How come I'm a messenger?
We already know about all the messages. There's a big chain of them going back past the Victorian era, the Industrial Age. Probably back to before anyone had heard of the Hebrews, or the Greeks.
Maybe we all should have just stayed in that garden.
We already know about all the messages. There's a big chain of them going back past the Victorian era, the Industrial Age. Probably back to before anyone had heard of the Hebrews, or the Greeks.
Maybe we all should have just stayed in that garden.
Maybe the Jews should have stayed in their own place, instead of "infiltrating" the mostly Christian West.
Maybe if the Hebrews had thought a bit about the consequences of rebelling when their country was occupied by a vastly superior military force?
And then kept their kingdom together through the rest of the first millenium, and the next, then they wouldn't have any unwanted people around, like they were in Europe (you know, unwanted).
Maybe if the Hebrews had thought a bit about the consequences of rebelling when their country was occupied by a vastly superior military force?
And then kept their kingdom together through the rest of the first millenium, and the next, then they wouldn't have any unwanted people around, like they were in Europe (you know, unwanted).
Maybe if the retarded, inbred Roman masses from Europe had stayed out and minded their own business, the jews wouldn't have been forced by them to go live amongst their genocidal descendents.
Well, if Alexander hadn't died before announcing a successor to his throne, the Hellenistic Empire wouldn't have collapsed like it did, into various contending smaller empires. Then the Romans might have been just another Hellenised people living somewhere in Tuscany, they might never have done more than absorb Greek culture, and provide manpower for Alexander's empire, in his armies and slave-galleys, etc.
So since Alexander failed to keep the upstart Romans in check, it must be his fault then...?
So since Alexander failed to keep the upstart Romans in check, it must be his fault then...?
Buffalo Roam
Registered Senior Member
Your opinion, nothing else, nothing more.
Alexander's empire was already showing cracks at the seams, it was set up in a way that it would never have out lasted him as a leader.
Alexander didn't believe that he could died, and he never named a successor to keep his generals competing, against each other, and not against him, such are the intrigues at court.
And under Hellenistic society, any society at that time period, the named successor more often than not didn't survive the transition.
- Status