It is sort of interesting (but pointless) to speculate what would have happened if Zionism had not in your POV "failed" but succeeded in getting most of the European Jews to move to the holy land during the decade 1929-1939 (assuming that the riots against the Jews in fall of 1929 also did not happen) I.e. suppose there was no creation of a "Jewish State" (Israel) later, but a population roughly half Islamic and half Jew (I.e. the 6 million that died in Europe were alive in the holy land).In my opinion, Zionism failed. There were still Jews in Europe at the time WWII broke out, so it should have happened much sooner....
Surely the brits would have found some way to set up a local government (to escape the cost of running things). Probably some sort of administrative council with equal representation of both religious groups that eventually wanted to be a nation (Called: "Semaniland"?) join the UN, get US aid, ETC.
The 1929 attacks on the Jews certainly did make it hard for the Zionists to recruit European Jews to migrate to such a backward region from the culturally advanced Europe. But even if those riots never happened, it would be a tough sell to get the most of the cultured Jews of Europe to move to the holy land of their 2000 year distant ancestors, given the conditions there.
Last edited by a moderator: