oh..sorry dude, our division at the NSA only handles fake cover ups. If you need info on a real cover-up...that's another agency.
News clips from 9-11-2001 **You can't debunk this**
- Thread starter Ganymede
- Start date
oh..sorry dude, our division at the NSA only handles fake cover ups. If you need info on a real cover-up...that's another agency.
FEMA report. Just thought it was interesting, so I decided to post it.
Ganymede
Valued Senior Member
oh..sorry dude, our division at the NSA only handles fake cover ups. If you need info on a real cover-up...that's another agency.
You were slaughtered in this debate. Thank you very kindly for throwing in the towel. I assume you'll recuse yourself from any further discussion. Since you already know the truth. :roflmao:
ASATA LA VISTA.. BABBY!
Last edited:
Why would thermite lead to molten steel in the rubble? Explosives don't cause such melting, they would vaporize it.
Ganymede
Valued Senior Member
Tons of thermate was used not thermite. That was the energy source that allowed it to be the longest burning structural fire in History. Even after some days of heavy raining the fires persisted.
Proof of your statement please?
Ganymede
Valued Senior Member
That was very compelling. Thank you very much for posting that. It dispelled alot of myths that the Government apologists were propagating.
THat GeoffP guy...it's like he has an answer for everything. I hate it. You know, you can be wrong sometimes buddy.
Then the thrermate truck pulled up with tons of thermate, and the workers dismatled the building to plant it. This was all done with no one noticing anything out of the ordinary in Manhattan, the city that never sleeps. And right in front of the most watched buildings in the world.
So when will you explain the motivation or need to intentionally destroy building 7?
oh right you said something like this:
Ganymede
Valued Senior Member
The sooner you put Geoff on ignore the sooner you can have something that symbolizes a civilized discussion. He's only interested in trolling. Not having an open and civilized debate. All of his points have been discredited. That's why there's no reason to see or respond to anything he has to say.
Three strikes, and you're out buddy
Last edited:
yeh, he seems like a real jerk. I hate people that have to be so smart all the time.
Ganymede
Valued Senior Member
Then the thrermate truck pulled up with tons of thermate, and the workers dismatled the building to plant it. This was all done with no one noticing anything out of the ordinary in Manhattan, the city that never sleeps. And right in front of the most watched buildings in the world.
So when will you explain the motivation or need to intentionally destroy building 7?
oh right you said something like this:
I've already addressed your questions. You're contributing nothing new to the debate. I'll repeat one last time, I'm not here to debate the motivations. We can't analyze or measure someone's intent. However, we can analyze and measure the evidence surrounding the event. I know you can't stick to the evidence. But atleast try. I'm not here to debate intent.
:deal:
Then the thrermate truck pulled up with tons of thermate, and the workers dismatled the building to plant it. This was all done with no one noticing anything out of the ordinary in Manhattan, the city that never sleeps. And right in front of the most watched buildings in the world.
So when will you explain the motivation or need to intentionally destroy building 7?
cuase it was full of FBI files and stuff. They couldnt just take it out and burn it or something. people would notice.
Bush and his cronies can do anyhing
The first thing in an investigation is to look at is motive not fantasies like you are giving here. Now i have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that logic takes a backseat in your theories and everyone can see that you posess child-like reasonong abilities.
Oh your a real winner.
Tell me your not serious. Can we have an 'over 13 year old' rule for this forum?
Ganymede
Valued Senior Member
Make your point by directly refuting the facts. Your problem is you're personalizing this debate. It's not about me, or him, or you. It's about the facts. Something you refuse to discuss. Your immature insults and put downs are getting old. We know your position. Instead of regurgitating the same insults try countering the information you disagree with, with facts of your own.
Ganymede
Valued Senior Member
I'm sorry, I'm not going to debate someone that asks me a question, and ignores the answer, only to repeat the same question again. That's what you've done each and every time I've answered one of your questions. Indstead of refuting the information you chose to insult my sanity and integrity. Geoff was a little more exteme with his defamation. That's why I recused myself from debating him. And the other 2 posters I put on ignore derserve to be ignored. Anyone who directs that amount of animosity towards me on their first post, is a clear indicator that person has developed a deep sense of resentment towards me.
That indicates that I've done, or said something to effect them on a personal level. Which increases the probability that we've exchanged words before. It's a common practice for someone to use an alt when they're losing a debate. This gives the illusion that people actually agree with whatever point they're trying to make.
Last edited: