A king is not a free civil government, it's a dictatorship.
Absolutely true the Consitution was derived exclusively from the Hebrew laws - to the extent at the time it was a direct rebuff to medevial Europe's clergy ruled criminalities. This has been reiterated by the archives of early American presidents, while there is nowhere else it could have come from. ...
Are you attempting to imply that it may be true? It is not listed in your bio, which states that you attended college for two years in the field of Criminology.Trooper,
Apparently there is a rumor going around the Internet that “I am in fact a highly respected biologist at a top US university“. One never knows?
"TRUE SCIENCE WILL ALWAYS SUPPORT GD’S WORD!
Moreover, the origin of most science, theories and ideas (if not all) about the nature of things have originated from the Bible that was written thousands of years ago, and continues to do so even in what we consider this advanced age. (keep reading to find out what these proofs are). Additionally, a whole chapter will be devoted to these advanced scientific proofs.
Sounds a little far fetched so far? Therefore to back this rational thinking up I have identified some contradictions and inconsistencies in the theory taught on Evolution. And by far in my analysis all data strongly nominates (and continues to do so) that the
“Evolution Theory” is INACCURATE."-Anita Meyer
Apparently there is a rumor going around the Internet that “I am in fact a highly respected biologist at a top US university“. One never knows?
A king is not a free civil government, it's a dictatorship.
Are you attempting to imply that it may be true? It is not listed in your bio, which states that you attended college for two years in the field of Criminology.
Sounds a little far fetched so far? :wtf:
Far-fetched is too kind. :crazy:
Firstly you have to provide evidence for that. Secondly it doesn't imply that the laws we have cannot be obtained/derived without religion. I've given examples of how a secular origin for things like "Don't kill" can come about.All laws which you see as coming from Europe, and accepted by the world - comes from the Hebrew.
Where in the bible is there motivation for democracy? The leaders are 'chosen by god' and if you don't like it tough. Where's the free and universal elections in the bible?the Greeks got their democrasy and alphabetical writings from the Hebrew 'AFTER' the first translation in 300 BCE.
Yeah, it got really nice and friendly here between 200AD and 1600AD, that time known as the Dark Ages. And after that Europe never had any wars or disagreements. Other than pretty much every major war which occured pre-1900 and was then primary battle ground in 2 world wars.There are no accepted laws from the Gospels or Quran - not a oner. Europe was a savage place before the Hebrew laws greeted them.
Where did they hold elections in the bible?A king is the same as the American president of today - if he is subject to the law.
Firstly you have to provide evidence for that. Secondly it doesn't imply that the laws we have cannot be obtained/derived without religion. I've given examples of how a secular origin for things like "Don't kill" can come about.
Where in the bible is there motivation for democracy? The leaders are 'chosen by god' and if you don't like it tough. Where's the free and universal elections in the bible?
Yeah, it got really nice and friendly here between 200AD and 1600AD, that time known as the Dark Ages. And after that Europe never had any wars or disagreements. Other than pretty much every major war which occured pre-1900 and was then primary battle ground in 2 world wars.
Yes, the bible really did its job, if its the source of all morals and laws. Do you even live in the same world as everyone else?
Where did they hold elections in the bible?
So does Islam and Scientology and Time Cube, doesn't make it so.The Hebrew itself claims there is wisdom and rightious in all nations.
So slavery is good? Stoning unruly children is good? Punishing anyone who tries to convince you your religion is wrong with death is good? To say nothing of the immoral 'law' put down by god that a person's actions are not as important as their belief.What appears to have happened instead is that the good laws were retained and the wrong laws were not included in the 613 [anagram of 10] laws
Are you referring to $$E=mc^{2}$$ here or am I not getting the reference?This is a far greater act: many can copy MC2 - but how many can edit and correct it?
Who aren't voted into positions of authority, they just happen to have been around longer.The Hebrew also states one must take advice from wise and righious elders.
Seriously, that's your argument? You think Saddam's rigging of elections is an example of democracy? The fact someone goes through the motions of an election and then ignores the result doesn't mean democracy failed, it means the leader failed democracy. Creationist seem to have a problem with understanding the difference between doing something and appearing to do something. An example is how they think if they make their own review journals so to 'publish' creation claims then they are doing science. Putting on a lab coat doesn't make you a scientist just like holding rigged elections is not enacting democracy.but Sadaam beat him by getting 100% voting success. Is that still democracy - why not?
No, it doesn't, you're using faulty logic. If I say "I don't have blue eyes" that doesn't mean I have brown eyes. If you're not following a 'CORRUPTED MULTITUDE' then you could be following a single corrupted person (despot, kinda like how god is) or you could follow a non-corrupted multitude or you could follow no one. You've presented a false dichotomy.'DO NOT FOLLOW A CORRUPTED MULTITUDE' [One of the 613 Hebrew laws].
What that means is:
'DO FOLLOW A NON-CORRUPTED MULTITUDE'.
Yes, Europe had things like the Crusades. We also have the more detailed recorded history of any part of the world, the US is a new born compared to Europe. During the Dark Ages, when religion was rife, there was more violence in day to day life than now.LOL! Europe mass murdered more innocent humans than any other force in geo-history. This applies even when discounting her last two worst centuries.
That's your interpretation. Most of Europe and the rest of the world thinks otherwise.Europe fillfilled away the majestic Hebrew laws
You haven't had 2 massive wars fought in your front garden. The only people to be killed on mainland America during all of WWII was a few people killed by a Japanese bomb which was attached to a balloon which had traversed the Pacific due to the jet stream. Britain got bombed flat. Before that we were the most powerful nation ever but war exhausted our wealth and weakened our hold on the rest of our colonies.Understand why Europe, an older people and land - slid behind, and a new country like America triumphed.
So why didn't god explain it to people? Why didn't god say "Hey, it'd be in your interest to get along and be lead by people you trust and whom you can hold accountable to their actions"? I suppose that'd contradict his "I'm god, shut the fuck up and do as I say!" attitude.That's a poor view of history. In ancient times there were no courts, solicitors, voting boots or party elections.
Nonsense. Agreeing not to kill or steal or hurt one another was already embedded in societies because if it wasn't a society would dissolve into chaos. A group of people who have formed a stable society must have agreed on basic rules to govern their interactions else they wouldn't be in a stable society. Thus the fact there were societies pre-bible means the notion of "Don't kill one another" was already in the Zeitgeist of most human cultures.The implementing of the laws took time - they were novel, controversial and subject to great disdain from the nation's divine kings.
Which could occur by purely secular means. The fact a nation is powerful doesn't mean god or faith in responsible. Two of the most powerful nations of the latter half of the 20th century were the USSR and China, both officially atheist. China is still on the rise, as is India. Clearly their lack of faith in the bible isn't holding them back.All I learnt from ancient history was the Hebrews were way ahead of nations mightier and older
Well they didn't get that from the bible. Jeptha (however you spell it) promised god he'd sacrifice to him the first thing which came out of his house when he returned from a battle if god helped him win. He won and then his daughter was the first to greet him. Given god is supposedly all knowing he knew such a thing would happen and he didn't communicate with Jeptha, he didn't alter the battle and he didn't cause something else (like an animal) to come out of the door first. If god thinks human sacrifices are wrong, as you're implying if it was supposedly made against the law by applying bible rules to everyday life, why didn't he do something to stop that one? God clearly broke his own rule, he was responsible for the sacrifice of someone in his name.they first forbid human sacrifice
If the US is so awesom because its so influenced by the bible and capital punishment is forbidden in the bible, so you claim, why do many US states have capital punishment? Is your god so inept at making his wishes clear that supposedly the good old US of A can't agree on the message? Surely if god is all knowing he's got the literary skills to have been able to get across his message clearly? And Islam, which is an off shoot of Judaism and which accepts the Abrahamic god and much (if not all) of the old testament, still have it. Saudi Arabic has public executions!they first forbid human sacrifice, capital punishment and ushered all the world's accepted laws
It was (and is) helped along by other countries. The US ploughs money into Israel! What helped Israel do things like win the 6 day war wasn't faith, it was being armed to the teeth with the latest technology provided by other countries. If Israel didn't have military power it wouldn't have lasted very long.This causes disdain - as we see with Israel today, a small bitsy barren state which became democratic in record time, in the world's most notorious region and while daily facing genocide. Truth is a dangerous and hated thing.
It was (and is) helped along by other countries. The US ploughs money into Israel! What helped Israel do things like win the 6 day war wasn't faith, it was being armed to the teeth with the latest technology provided by other countries. If Israel didn't have military power it wouldn't have lasted very long.
To say 'its just blackness' implies that somehow my consciousness is aware of itself yet gets no sensory input. No, I experience nothing. Ever had anaesthetic or gotten really drunk or fallen asleep without realising it? You don't experience anything during those times, that's what I would imagine death would like, ie its not 'like' anything. The thing which is 'me' is a highly complex electrochemical pattern within my brain maintained by the input of chemical energy and oxygen. Should either of those stop for a protracted period of time 'I' stop. Once the pattern is gone 'I' am gone and I experience nothing whatsoever.
More historically incorrect bupkis.IamJoseph said:All laws which you see as coming from Europe, and accepted by the world - comes from the Hebrew.
Cultures like the native Americans or native Australians had similar principles of not killing one another in day to day life and not to steal other people's property, despite being utterly isolated from any kind of Abrahamic religion until the Americas and Australia were discovered. Clearly people can conclude "Thou shall not kill" without the bible, so in fact its more reasonable to conclude that the bible got many of its basic rules from society, not the other way around.
You'd rather we go back to your ignorance on thermodynamics?
Why should live have a purpose, in the sense you mean? There's no reason to think life must have a grand purpose, it exists to continue its existence. Of course I can give myself purpose, to learn and experience things, to helps others or to somehow leave my mark in our society but even that eventually vanishes as humans won't be around forever and even a few generations from now its likely no one will remember anything about it. That doesn't make my life utterly vacuous without any reason to carry on, atheism isn't some kind of nihilistic emo point of view. If you want a purpose in life, give yourself one. Better someone else's life or contribute to society, as that's the only way you'll do anything which won't be immediately forgotten.
Certainly doing something like helping society is a much better purpose than the one Christianity promotes, that we're going to an afterlife to either be tortured or be stuck saying "Wow, you're fucking awesome" every 5 seconds to some bearded guy on a throne. What's the purpose in that? Who'd want to spend eternity give god metaphorical handjobs?
There's little or nothing 'good' about 'the good book'.
So what is life all about? It seems nothing we do matters here in this life provided we accept Jesus etc etc and then when we get to the next the only purpose is to be a sycophant to some guy who claims to be 'loving' and 'caring' but threatens people with infinite torment for a single 'crime' of not believing, independent of what else they do.
If someone can murder 20 people and then be 'born again' and get into heaven while someone who works all their life bettering the lives of the poor and needy, but doesn't think there's enough evidence to believe, gets tormented forever then there's absolutely zero reason to call god moral, just, merciful, honourable, kind or in any way good. If god exists and the bible is an accurate representation of his character then he doesn't deserve worship.
And the one and only criteria seems to be "Do you honestly believe?". If someone's actions don't come into it then its an unjust way of judging people, as my comment about a murderer highlights. The Christian god rewards ignorance and gullibility over kindness and charity. What's the justice in that?
As I just said, Pascal's wager fails on every level. First you assume the criteria you think god uses to judge you are the actual criteria. You assume that 'god' is the Christian god, if he's Allah then you're just pissing him off by not praying 5 times a day, so meeting your god's criteria doesn't mean you've met some other god's criteria. You're assuming thoughts matter more than actions. You're assuming your faith costs you nothing when it seems to have cost you your intellectual honesty and curiosity. And you're also assuming that faith is subject to the will. I can say "Jesus is my saviour" but is that enough? If someone is a Christian just to avoid hell is their god not all knowing? Can he not tell if someone is just 'going through the motions' out of fear?
Not all religions can be right, so you jumping through the hoops for the Christian god doesn't mean you'll not end up in the hell of some other god. Some religions, including some sects of Christianity, dislike the believes of other religions but those who don't believe in other gods (aka atheists) are okay. For instance, I'm not breaking the 1st commandment, I have no other gods before the Christian god. But then I have no gods at all. And if I die and find myself in front of St. Peter and he says "Despite you being a good person and being rational and intellectually honest your lack of faith in god, for which you never saw any evidence for, means He is condemning you to hell" then god is, quite frankly, a dick. If god is actually this kind, merciful intelligent benevolent father figure than if I'm a good person and I am intellectually honest and he knows that I didn't see sufficient evidence to make a reasonable conclusion that he exists then he'd not condemn me to eternal torture. After all, he knows everything and the honesty of each and every persona and the very notion of hell is the antithesis of being merciful and benevolent. But it might well be the case that god isn't a moral and just person and then he might just torment everyone, including people who believed in him. You have no reason to think your religion's view of him is right or that he/she/it/they dislike anyone not in that religion.
Is this your plan now, you've tried arguing nonsense, you've tried the creationist talking points, you've tried lying about science and history and now you're onto the emotional blackmail. Its the Mafia boss situation, god says "Do as I say or I break your legs" or "It'd be a shame if something bad happened to you but if you pay me I'll protect you".
God has the power to prove to everyone he exists, if he exists. He would know precisely what it would take to convince me in such a way that I don't think I've gone nuts. So why doesn't he? Why does he play this game where he used to be a burning bush or a column of fire but now he just works 'in mysterious ways'. Ways so mysterious 70% of people don't believe the stories about him (ie non-Christians) and no one, despite plenty of people wanting to, can provide clear evidence he exists. And he's come up with a game where people who aren't gullible and who use the mind he's given them to ask questions like "Why should I believe this thing without evidence?" are tormented forever while those who turn their eyes away from the universe he created for them get rewarded.
According to your theology he made the universe and knows all things, past, present and future, so he knew that humans would 'fall' and stop believing in him and rather than do as he (supposedly) did in the past and come down and demonstrate himself he keeps quiet and then burns those who didn't believe a copy of a copy of a heavily edited synopsis of a story passed down via here-say from people who weren't eye witnesses to the last time he supposed demonstrated himself openly.
If god wants people to believe why doesn't he demonstrate himself? Why rely on a book which has been heavily edited by people with agendas and which isn't even an eye witness account in the vast majority of it (and those which might be are suspect)? Why did he stop demonstrating himself? If we're so much more sinful and whatnot now why is he more silent than he used to be?
Then you waste the one life you're certain to have in the hope there might be another. Its like buying a lottery ticket, winning and then throwing it away because the next ticket might be a bigger prize. I suppose you can liken it to the Nigerian 419 scams. They promise you $20 million but need a small up front fee. What's $1000 when you'll get $20 million? Then there's some problem and they need another $5000. Then $8000. Then $10000. Then before you know it you've lost all your money and all you have is empty promises.
A king is the same as the American president of today - if he is subject to the law.
Where did I mention nuclear weapons?Yes, and do you think it was just a coincidence that the US president John F. Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963. He was known for pressuring Israel on getting rid of its nuclear plan. After his assassination he was replaced by President Lyndon Johnson who was a great supporter of Israel. He armed Israel with weapons before the 1967 six day war. If Kennedy was still in office, this would never have happened. Obviously we know the outcome of that.
The emergent property of highly complex electrochemical processes in the brain.Lets for a moment try an explain what “consciousness” is?
Homoeostatic processes are controlled by lower levels of the brain. The base of the brain is known in common reference as 'the lizard brain', the part which works automatically and separately of conscious thought. Pulse, temperature regulation, hormone production, autonomic nerve reflexes. That last one is also handled in part by the spinal column so that if you do something stupid like pick up a very hot object the signal and response are quicker, ie doesn't have to make you consciously aware, hence why you can drop something hot before 'you' have even become aware of it.Lets say (for what ever reasons) one finds themselves unconscious - the brain in no longer consciously awake. However, the body and its organs still seems to be functioning quite well and appear to have a different consciousness that directs the activity of the body. There appears to be two kinds of consciousness’ occupying our body, one is a “higher consciousness” of the mind, and the other is a “lower consciousness” of the body.
Remember what I said about bible quotes? They don't justify your position and they don't convince me. Not to mention you provide no evidence for your claims about consciousness. Can you provide empirical evidence?This form of consciousness extracts itself slowly from the body and eventually all consciousnesses departs. Now when this happens, consciousness “reflects” a complete copy of itself outside the bounds of the physical body and death is final, then there is the judgment. Hebrews 9:27 - And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment.
Science not having an answer to a question right now doesn't make your 'answer' any more valid. I've already been through this with you, remember?Science has not yet learned to “separate” something that is created that goes “beyond” what the chemical hormones have induced, to a state of tangible scientific exploration of the invisible forces that allows for a state of mind/body/spirit separation.
Speaking as someone who has spent the better part of the last decade doing quantum mechanics I can confidently say your claims are not justified. If quantum mechanics pointed to a notion like the soul or to a god then the prevalence of theism would increase in the theoretical physics community compared to the community at large. Speaking from first hand experience, both as a member of that community and knowing others in it, this is not the case. You once again assert things you not only have no knowledge of but you assert it to people who clearly do have knowledge of it.This also allows for Quantum Mechanics again to squeeze its way into the resolution (of the separations of energies, cloning of particles and connectivity over vast distances) when we consider that atoms can be in multiple places at once, thanks to natures variances of “non locality” bio-location of ones being becomes possible outside the realm of the physical body.
Ah, so you have seen my arguments and comments before. Then you're not just wilfully ignorant for not doing your research about things like thermodynamics and evolution but you're deliberately ignoring that your arguments are false or invalid. Accidental stupidity is one thing, gross deliberate stupidity is inexcusable.Your reasoning, psychology, philosophy and view point is nothing new! I can smell it all through your postings like the fowl spell of a skunk on a hot humid day.
And where in the bible does it say "Satan's characteristics include supporting the notion of evolution"?The Bible describes the personality of Satan for us so that we are able to readily recognize him. It tells us that he corrupts in many ways. Some of his characteristics include false religion and evolution theory
Science is about challenging our understanding of the world, that's why there's peer review in reputable journals. If your position can't stand up to scrutiny then why believe it? Without saying "What makes you say that?" we'd still be thinking the Earth is flat and the Sun goes around it. Besides, if you position is true then it shouldn't be worried about scrutiny, about people saying "Where's your evidence?".Satan is also knows as “the accuser, the adversary or the challenger”
Is this an admission that all the bad things that occur supposedly due to the devil is actually the responsibility of god?According to the Old Testament, Satan has no power or authority in and of himself, rather he must get permission from the Judge, G-d, in order to do anything.
Think for a moment about that. You're taking the word of a religious document, for which no original copies exist and which as been translated and edited many times over thousands of years, that Satan will distort religious documents? Your position is self refuting! If the bible says not to trust old religious texts lest the devil has tainted them then you can't trust the bible, as its perhaps one of the most 'human tweaked' religious texts in existence. Wouldn't the devil want to pervert the holy book of the largest religious group, so as to affect as many people as possible?So Satan’s best option is to plagiarize and pervert the original scripture of G-d into the form of other religious documents and religions of the world (that “he“ most likely fashioned and influenced).
None, since I don't think he exists. How many do I think some man (or men) has influenced? Every single one of them as they are all works of men.Which ones do you think he has influenced?
Citation needed. Even even if they do that doesn't imply they are those referred to in the bible. Trees and floods exist all over the world and have done for as long as we've been around.his is false, its you who are the backwards one, and both history (and the Bible) testifies to this! Such people like the American Indians and Australian aborigines have ancestral stories that tell of a Great Flood as well as a Tree of Knowledge of good and evil.
You have failed several times to even acknowledge that we're not talking about the universe, we're talking about this planet. There's a huge ball of light in the sky each day, providing us with energy. The Earth is an open system within the closed system of the universe. If some thing can enter or leave a system then its not closed, the Sun's energy enters the Earth's biosphere and thus it is not closed. An entropy decrease due to a plant turning carbon dioxide and water into glucose using the Sun's energy is off set many many times over by the increase in entropy of the Sun's plasma. Eventually it'll run out of fuel and stop shining, the solar system will wind down. Until then though we can use the Sun's enormous increase of entropy to allow us to decrease ours.I already answer this question!
Again, in the full spectrum of the Universe there are no open systems, even though they may appear to be, it is an illusion since the overall system is down winding in available energy (the 2nd law of thermodynamics and entropy). No illusionary open system can outsmart it!
Because unlike you I have done some thermodynamics. Unlike you I paid attention in school. Unlike you I give a damn whether or not my beliefs are true. Unlike you I have an inquisitive mind.What don’t you understand about this?
By your ignorance, willingness to lie, delusional narcissism and the fact you con laypeople out of their money by flogging them your BS book.Sounds like somebody is really angry!
Can't you find a retort to what I said? Here it is again for you.Again, sounds like somebody I’ve described above.
You mean 'resorts to reasoning'. You put forth Pascal's wager and I explained why its flawed. If Islam is right you and I are both going to hell so you believing the bible doesn't make you 'safe'. If god is unlike anything any religion has ever considered but he still ends people to hell then you're not 'safe' either. The "What if you're wrong" argument assumes a false dichotomy, that its atheism or your religion. Even if, some how, I knew that one of the religions in the world today was the 'true' one I have no way of knowing which one it is, none of them present any reason or evidence.Resorts to secular reasoning - archetypal again!
And yet you couldn't actually reply to it specifically. I explained why Pascal's Wager is invalid, can't you manage to do the same with my comments?This is the biggest straw man yet.
Are you so out of responses you're resorting to stating irrelevant tautologies now?Trying to sway the believers.
So where's this 'proof'? You mean a story? From a book which has no evidence for being true? A book which is inconsistent with reality? That's your 'proof'?This is the oldest trick in the book. FYI, it doesn’t work anymore, you’ve cried wolf to many times already with this excuse. Proof was already given to 3 million Jews at Mount Sinai. This is called a national revelation.
To continue with my lottery analogy, I played the way you should play if you don't want to throw your money away for no reason, I didn't play in the first place. Obviously that analogy was too subtle for you to realise I was referring to the way people waste the one life we're sure they'll get by hoping there's another one.Looks like you’ve lost “all your money”.
Originally Posted by Anita Meyer
This also allows for Quantum Mechanics again to squeeze its way into the resolution (of the separations of energies, cloning of particles and connectivity over vast distances) when we consider that atoms can be in multiple places at once, thanks to natures variances of “non locality” bio-location of ones being becomes possible outside the realm of the physical body. ”
Originally Posted by Alphanumeric
Speaking as someone who has spent the better part of the last decade doing quantum mechanics I can confidently say your claims are not justified. If quantum mechanics pointed to a notion like the soul or to a god then the prevalence of theism would increase in the theoretical physics community compared to the community at large. Speaking from first hand experience, both as a member of that community and knowing others in it, this is not the case. You once again assert things you not only have no knowledge of but you assert it to people who clearly do have knowledge of it.
You have failed several times to even acknowledge that we're not talking about the universe, we're talking about this planet. There's a huge ball of light in the sky each day, providing us with energy. The Earth is an open system within the closed system of the universe. If some thing can enter or leave a system then its not closed, the Sun's energy enters the Earth's biosphere and thus it is not closed. An entropy decrease due to a plant turning carbon dioxide and water into glucose using the Sun's energy is off set many many times over by the increase in entropy of the Sun's plasma. Eventually it'll run out of fuel and stop shining, the solar system will wind down. Until then though we can use the Sun's enormous increase of entropy to allow us to decrease ours.
Your argument would imply plants can't turn high entropy carbon dioxide and water into low entropy sugar. It would imply no living thing can grow or heal as that requires arranging complex molecules in a particular way. Your argument implies you are thermodynamically impossible.
Can't you find a retort to what I said? Here it is again for you.
"So what is life all about? It seems nothing we do matters here in this life provided we accept Jesus etc etc and then when we get to the next the only purpose is to be a sycophant to some guy who claims to be 'loving' and 'caring' but threatens people with infinite torment for a single 'crime' of not believing, independent of what else they do.
If someone can murder 20 people and then be 'born again' and get into heaven while someone who works all their life bettering the lives of the poor and needy, but doesn't think there's enough evidence to believe, gets tormented forever then there's absolutely zero reason to call god moral, just, merciful, honourable, kind or in any way good. If god exists and the bible is an accurate representation of his character then he doesn't deserve worship. "
There is an "Anita Meyer" who is studying for a Masters degree in biology, but that isn't you, is it?