Bells
Staff member
So the passengers would have been better off if they land on ground instead of water? If they had landed a couple minutes earlier? He did a textbook case of crash landing, without fuel. I don't know anything about planes, but I fail to see what he could have done without fuel.
We will never know, will we? Those few minutes of panic and their stopping everything to pray, they could have done something else.. That instead of wasting valuable time praying, they could have saved everyone or no one at all.. What they did was astounding to say the least. I'll point out again..
They claimed he then opted to crash-land the plane instead trying to reach a nearby airport.
A plane without fuel can glide and have done so in the past. What those passengers should have gotten were competent pilots who were up to the task and their training. Not some pilots who started panicking and then praying before they even started to follow procedure. Yes, many did survive, but 16 died and those 16 could have maybe survived if they didn't have 2 bumbling praying fools in the cockpit.
I don't know about you, if I am in a plane and the engine's cut out, I would want and expect the pilot to be doing his or her job. And that does not include panicking, start praying before even starting to follow procedure. A good pilot follows procedure and tries to do what he can to get his plane down in one piece. A bad pilot starts panicking, starts praying and then after he's done praying, starts to follow procedure. It is the time he lost while praying that could have saved many more lives on that plane. He could have landed it at the nearby airport, or he could have slowed that plane down during the glide and saved more of his passengers. Instead, he chose to stop what he was doing and start praying.
Tell me, if it was one of your relatives who died on that plane, would you be so kind and understanding about a pilot who chose to pray instead of doing what he was meant to do (ie. fly the plane and follow procedure)?