Moderator bias

I, personally, feel I have been unfairly treated by the following moderator(s):

  • Total voters
    35
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
one_raven said:
Extreme examples? Of course, but I am trying to make a point.
Speaking up for what you see as unfair treatment is discarded as a joke because, supposedly, you have no personal stake in the outcome.
Bullshit attitudes like that is what upsets people here, and what keeps them from complaining, because it will get them nowhere.
Click to expand...
this is probably why the mods here do not fear reprisals.
it's probably also why i am getting the shaft lately, because i WILL go head to head with these people, and getting banned in the process.

spuriousmonkey said:
Is it the one about the American, the troll and the homo?
Click to expand...
go here spurious:
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=1537363#post1537363
we really need to keep this thread on target.
 
SkinWalker said:
Trolling in the open government forum is even worse form, but I see it didn't stop you from posting. How have you been by the way? Nice to see you. Good of you to vote for me!

Everyone... vote for me!
Click to expand...

no trolling going on. you are violently biased, and have intentionally trivialized this thread and poll because you know you would lead it, regardless of your childish cheerleading.

ive been fine. i was just married,as im sure you honestly care.
you truly are an exemplary specimen for this poll.
 
The Devil Inside said:
no trolling going on. you are violently biased, and have intentionally trivialized this thread and poll because you know you would lead it, regardless of your childish cheerleading.
Click to expand...

"Violently" biased? I assure you, no kittens or small children were injured in any of my moderation. Well... maybe a kitten or two fell victim. But they have 9 lives, right?

And, yes, I've trivialized the thread. Its funny. And if you agree, you must vote for me! :)

ive been fine. i was just married,as im sure you honestly care.
you truly are an exemplary specimen for this poll.
Click to expand...

Congratulations! I was lucky enough to marry my best friend and she and I have been together nearly a full decade now. It's great to find the right person.

And, in spite of your poor opinion of me, I can't find it in myself to have on of you. Hell, I don't even remember why you're so pissed at me. But, since the thread is about "bias," it would seem that this has created a bias that doesn't allow you to see past your own animosity. Sad, really.

So, for whatever real or perceived injustice I've done you in the past, please accept my humblest apologies. If you can't accept them... oh well. I'll still get on with my day either way.

draqon said:
I gotta say Skinwalker's infractions just for necromancy...are evil.
Click to expand...

And, in addition to casting spells raising the dead through infractions, I've also discovered that I can use IP addresses obtained by the system to make others do my bidding through a special Voodoo rite. It involves kittens, however.
 
James R gets only 4 votes, even though everyone bitches about him, while Skinwalker has ten?
And voted for himself.
 
James R said:
In the case of Zakariya04, either all the moderators bear a personal grudge against him (which I feel is unlikely), or we can safely discount his votes. We can also probably discount Skinwalker's own complaint against himself.

.
Click to expand...

Dear JamesR
Hum having looked at your inital post perhaps i got the wrong end of the stick.

but in fairness you can not doubt that the Amazing one is the most un bias out of the lot of you.

~~~~~~~~
take it ez
zak
 
SkinWalker is the devil of the Religion forum who is not particularly fond of religious people. Sometimes I think that maybe that's what this place needs to lessen the amount of religious zealots here. :D
On the other hand it's not very fair, but such is life.
 
James R strikes me as balanced moderator who follows rules accordingly and...blah blah blah...he is a God of Sciforums in my eyes. of course that doggy avatar displeases me...but the moderator behind it sure has it in him.
 
draqon said:
James R strikes me as balanced moderator who follows rules accordingly and...blah blah blah...he is a God of Sciforums in my eyes. of course that doggy avatar displeases me...but the moderator behind it sure has it in him.
Click to expand...

yeah, but you are a nutter.
 
Without mentioning names, there is a moderator here that is vocal about telling people "if you don't like it leave". I think he is trying to prove he has a bigger penis...I an not into those games. But on the other hand I found SAM most useful. I posed my question to SAM and she promptly emailed me the answers...all the rules. It was very helpful. I would hope all moderators would be as helpful, rather than trying to boot folks out. I think it would make the forum much better if we had more like SAM.
 
Humm, from that poll it appears that Bells has the smallest penis. Poor girl... :(
 
leopold99 said:
fourth is there is NOTHING in place to correct mod misuse of power.
Click to expand...

after the work pseudo put into sci, i doubt if he would let some punk ass mod ruin it

unless you are privy to...

tribunals
lets have em
open to the public

sciforums -- taking egalitarianism to new heights
 
joepistole said:
It was very helpful. I think it would make the forum much better if we had more like SAM.
Click to expand...
i have no doubt that some people also found hitler, stalin, castro, and saddam "very helpful".
sam is on an anti american crusade, the likes of which this board has never seen.
instead of boosting indias image she resorts to such low blows as evading questions, refusing to provide requested evidence, playing the race card, you name it this woman has played it, and practically every single bit of it against america.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top