So predictable. Take what the person claims is there's, and make it sound like it belongs to someone else.
I understand it isn't to your liking, but facts are facts Happeh. I know you'll consider it an attack, evil and rude - and it will certainly give you the chance to attempt to defame my character some more for the next 30 posts, but if you spend 2 minutes in google you will see that people were making these claims centuries ago.
You really are scum Snakelord.
I shall add it to the list.
You are so full of baloney! I am not religious. I don't know any religious people. I don't go to church. I don't read the biblie.
Not once did I say you were or did.
Just like most of your other writings, that stuff is all lies or things you just make up because it sounds good.
Or perhaps you just didn't understand the post. It wouldn't be the first time.
Yep. Just like I said. You wanted personal details so you could use them to insult me.
It's strange how you regard everything as an insult while spending your entire time calling everyone else scumbags and whatever else you can come up with. I suppose people here give as good as they get. Suffice it to say my name has featured prominently in every post you've made after I decided there was nothing else to discuss. Why should I have to be insulted when I'm not even here? Is that how you do things Happeh, wait until someone isn't around so you can insult them? Either that or you just miss me a lot. Admittedly you have also tried the direct approach, and attempted to insult me straight to my face. While the insults themselves are not a big deal, it does smell of extreme hypocricy.
You are a snake, Snakelord. Your nick does psychologically describe you.
Well, you'd certainly know more than I would.
Keep telling yourself that
If you studied for a change we'd actually have nothing to discuss. You would come to understand that it is a scientific fact that there are no negative short-term or long-term medical health effects from masturbation. Seemingly you want sciences say on the matter, indeed you bring it up several times throughout your posts;
"How many of you that are giving me grief are actually employed as scientist, or have scientific training? If I am talking to a bunch of people who just happened to drop into a science forum, I am going to be disappointed. "
"Not one person in this forum has acted scientific and tried to follow anything I have said."
The fact is Happeh, that everyone here debating against you has done so from a scientific standpoint, and science does disagree with you. It would seem more peritinent that you request that people be unscientific and take your claims unscientifically. Upon doing so you might find some people actually agree with you.
The argument ends here because I exposed you as a mental health professional using their training to terrorize and abuse people on the internet.
What training did
you undergo to be able to abuse people on the internet? Having been called all kinds of names and had my character defamed constantly since page 7, you must have been top of the class. Indeed you have done little other than attempt to defame my character, my profession, any other profession that disagrees with you and any other person that disagrees with you, (oh and not to mention even my entire country - that you claimed as all liars). You have spent ten times the amount of time telling us all what you think of a certain person or profession than you have actually talking about Happeh 'theory'. You then wait 5 minutes after doing so and then claim everyone has run away. The facts are right there for everyone to see, even you.
It is a disgustingly naive way of doing things, I can only hope this is some massive joke you've got lined up. If it is I say well done, you've done a grand job - if it isn't there's probably very little I can say without expecting another entire post from you dedicated to defaming my character.
Although the lemmings here cannot see it, we both know your brain is in a turmoil because I scored a direct hit.
I'll agree if it makes you feel better about yourself. Just one question: What 'direct hit'? As far as I recall, I provided you with the facts and left you with them, and you then complained everyone had run away and continued insulting someone that wasn't even here. Where in all of that nonsense was this 'hit' you speak of?
You don't see me playing word games for pages while refusing to participate in a discussion.
Thats is
all you have done Happeh. Someone asks for evidence, you say scientists know nothing. Someone asks for your research on the subject, you say it's all in your head, someone asks you to explain what it is you see in that photo, you say it shows masturbation damage but then fail to explain how exactly - and then of course someone eventually disagrees because they are thinking scientifically, and you then take the opportunity to insult and defame them as much as you possibly can.
While that is your right, it might be contributing to all the adversity that you seem to have a serious problem with.
I plainly state that any honest and friendly person willing to think like a scientist investigating a new phenomenon will get full cooperation from me.
That's very nice of you, but there is a difference between saying and doing. The fact of the matter is that people here
are being honest and 'thinking like scientists'. That is exactly why they disagree and ask for evidence. Like I stated earlier, state that you want dishonest, unscientific people and you'll find we all agree.
If they come at me like you, aggressive, hurtful, playing submission/dominance games
I must confess this is becoming extremely tiresome. It doesn't wash Happeh, and you know it. I have done everything to try and extract some discussion of worth from this thread, but you have made it impossible - not just for me but for everyone. James R for example has given you some sound questions that you have ignored - while instead taking it upon yourself to defame his character just like you have everyone elses. You also seemingly expect everyone to understand what it is you apparently see in these pictures and videos of yours, and yet refuse to explain it when people don't. You then go on to say; "I have posted my story about how untrained people cannot see things they are not trained to see", and so if we're all untrained, why provide pictures that we wouldn't be able to understand anyway without providing that training? And yet you don't. When people have asked, you tell them it takes years or decades and so on, in which case why do you seemingly get so frustrated when people don't see what you want them to? Of course aside from that we have all seen this glorious display of you pumping your ego up to it's very limits. I would say you almost have a Norman Bates personality to you - a man that has been told everything is bad and everything he does is wrong for so many years that his brain has had little choice but to supply it with a strong dose of self worth. Now you do the very unscientific and highly ignorant act of proclaiming yourself chief and master without exception, and at the expense of what is actually real and what isn't. Trust me Happeh, you are untrained and it would take years of training to understand, but I suppose we could come to some kind of a deal.. You train me all about your wanking expertise and I shall train you in how to understand humans - because right now you're doing a piss poor job of it. Does that sound ok to you?
It says I am too much for Snakelord. He has met his match and is abondoning the field in defeat.
If it helps serve your ego, and those underlying, unresolved problems of yours than I shall agree. Of course it could just be that you have nothing to say. In ten pages you have literally said nothing, other than defame characters and promote your own ego. There is nothing here of any value, just that. Of course that will change once you're actually more interested in discussion than attempting to show yourself as being better than everyone else. Don't get me wrong, you can be better if that's what you want, but then you might aswell just make your own 'worship happeh' website and be done with it. You are on a science website right now, and science is the issue. The fact of the matter is you have decided to stop by here without bringing any science along with you. I understand this is not a science subsection, but a religion subsection - but alas.. you've failed to bring any of that with you either. What exactly is left?
The amusing thing is that several times you've even expressed your hatred for both. When you misunderstood my post and thought I was implying that you were religious, you got all upset over it, claimed me to be a fool, and that your 'friends' would laugh. On the science side you have continually labelled anyone in a scientific field as a liar, trained to deceive humanity. With such blatant dislike for these things I can only question why you would even be here to begin with. Let me paint you a quick picture:
You come to a place full of people you don't like or trust just to tell them all that you're better than them.
I know you're untrained, but give some thought as to why you would do that.
You are just a hater trying to drag me down.
Yes, we're all haters. I suppose that adds to your reassurance that you're right and helps inflate that ego just a tad more. "Out to get me", is a GNR song that I think you'll appreciate. Give it a listen sometime.
I suppose the normal action when someone, (like myself), comes along and gives across such hate, is to add me to ignore. Instead of that you have mentioned my name 10 times in every post since my polite departure. It seems you miss me a lot more than you're willing to admit. I missed you too. Without you, how would anyone realise "it could always be worse"?
The fact of the matter is that you're on a forum pretty full with scientifically minded people. And there you are spouting the most unscientific nonsense since the claim that there was a big sky dome surrounding the earth. It comes as no surprise that you will find adversity and disagreement, and then to do the even more unscientific thing of proclaiming yourself as right, science be damned, is utter insanity if you are expecting everyone to follow you.
It's like standing in the middle of the Bronx wearing a sign that says "I hate niggers", (from Die Hard 3), and then wondering why people seem to have an issue with you.
You don't care about science, scientific inquiry or the scientific method.
The fact is you haven't got the slightest clue what science is, nor do you seemingly understand the 'scientific method' and thus are in no position to be making the statement you have. I am aware you wont understand any of this, so I'll just agree with you to help you feel better about yourself.
Maybe you should stop being a doctor and hire yourself at as a Dominatrix in the sex magazines.
Perhaps.
Yes it is. Science is about correlation. You should know that. Masturbation is sex. Sex is sex. Viagra is for lots of sex. Viagra plus lots of sex = blindness. Therefore, there is a correlation between sex and blindness. The first sentence says Masturbation = Sex. So we can say that it is reasonable to conclude that Masturbation could be related to science.
Did it ever occur to you that the issue might be with the chemicals in the pill, instead of getting a boner? Your way of finding correlations is so naive it's ridiculous. But wait, save I be defamed some more, you're right. Everything you say is spot on.
why don't I show you what I consider evidence or proof? This won't mean anything to you. There are no experts telling you what to think or believe.
I couldn't agree more. There are
no experts telling us anything, just you agreeing that no experts will agree. You really know how to argue your value out of the discussion, I'll give you that.
