Luminiferous Aether Exists!

[ash64449]

There is no need for a 4th or 5th dimension. Everything is with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists, including the rate at which atomic clocks tick. That is why the speed of light is always measured to be 'c'.

Light propagates through the aether.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave.

Both are waves in the aether.

Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechnics.

Actually ,luminiferous aether does not exist...

Extract from wikipedia:

The timeline of luminiferous aether begins in the 18th century with the concept of luminiferous aether ("light-bearing aether"), or ether, as a medium for electromagnetic propagation. The aether was assumed to exist for much of the 19th century—until the Michelson-Morley experiment returned the famous "null result". Further experiments were in general agreement and by the 1920s the aether was mostly assumed not to exist.

But the unification of gravity and light actually came from mathematical equation.Remember this,they didn't try to unify light with gravity..when they tried to expand 4th dimension to 5th dimension,Maxwell's theory of light popped out of their equations!!!

 

[gravitational_aether]

Actually ,luminiferous aether does not exist...

Extract from wikipedia:

The timeline of luminiferous aether begins in the 18th century with the concept of luminiferous aether ("light-bearing aether"), or ether, as a medium for electromagnetic propagation. The aether was assumed to exist for much of the 19th century—until the Michelson-Morley experiment returned the famous "null result". Further experiments were in general agreement and by the 1920s the aether was mostly assumed not to exist.

But the unification of gravity and light actually came from mathematical equation.Remember this,they didn't try to unify light with gravity..when they tried to expand 4th dimension to 5th dimension,Maxwell's theory of light popped out of their equations!!!

Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the aether.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE

The analogy is putting a mesh bag full of marbles into a supersolid and spinning the bag of marbles. If you were unable to determine if the supersolid consists of particles or not you would still be able to detect the state of displacement of the supersolid.

The supersolid connected to and neighboring the mesh bag of marbles is in the same state throughout the rotation of the bag in the superfluid.

The aether connected to and neighboring the Earth is in the same state, or almost the same state, throughout the Earth's rotation about its axis and orbit of the Sun.

This is the reason for the near-null MMX result. The MMX looked for a stationary aether the Earth moved through. The MMX looked for the aether wind. There is no such thing as an aether wind. The aether is not an absolutely stationary space. Aether is displaced by matter.

The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the Earth and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

 

[ash64449]

Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the aether.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE

The analogy is putting a mesh bag full of marbles into a supersolid and spinning the bag of marbles. If you were unable to determine if the supersolid consists of particles or not you would still be able to detect the state of displacement of the supersolid.

The supersolid connected to and neighboring the mesh bag of marbles is in the same state throughout the rotation of the bag in the superfluid.

The aether connected to and neighboring the Earth is in the same state, or almost the same state, throughout the Earth's rotation about its axis and orbit of the Sun.

This is the reason for the near-null MMX result. The MMX looked for a stationary aether the Earth moved through. The MMX looked for the aether wind. There is no such thing as an aether wind. The aether is not an absolutely stationary space. Aether is displaced by matter.

The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the Earth and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

That means the displacement of aether forces the light to bend around the massive objects.Well,are you saying that twist in space-time caused aether to get displaced or simply that aether can be moved with the help of massive objects that caused light to bend?

 

[gravitational_aether]

That means the displacement of aether forces the light to bend around the massive objects.

Correct. Displaced aether is the cause of gravitational lensing.

Well,are you saying that twist in space-time caused aether to get displaced or simply that aether can be moved with the help of massive objects that caused light to bend?

The state of displacement of the aether is referred to as a twist in space-time.

What Einstein referred to as curved spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether.

The geometrical representation of gravity as curved spacetime physically exists in nature as displaced aether.

Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.

Currently, 'moved' is an incorrect term when describing the aether. Aether is displaced by matter.

 

[ash64449]

Correct. Displaced aether is the cause of gravitational lensing.



The state of displacement of the aether is referred to as a twist in space-time.

What Einstein referred to as curved spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether.

The geometrical representation of gravity as curved spacetime physically exists in nature as displaced aether.

Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.

Currently, 'moved' is an incorrect term when describing the aether. Aether is displaced by matter.

So,I think your theory is in direct violation of Theory Of Relativity

 

[gravitational_aether]

So,I think your theory is in direct violation of Theory Of Relativity

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable"

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

"Think of waves on the surface of water. Here we can describe two entirely different things. Either we may observe how the undulatory surface forming the boundary between water and air alters in the course of time; or else-with the help of small floats, for instance - we can observe how the position of the separate particles of water alters in the course of time. If the existence of such floats for tracking the motion of the particles of a fluid were a fundamental impossibility in physics - if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the water as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that water consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium."

The aether is a medium which does not consist of individual particles which can be separatly tracked through time. The aether physically occupies three dimensional space and is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.

 

[ash64449]

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable"

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

"Think of waves on the surface of water. Here we can describe two entirely different things. Either we may observe how the undulatory surface forming the boundary between water and air alters in the course of time; or else-with the help of small floats, for instance - we can observe how the position of the separate particles of water alters in the course of time. If the existence of such floats for tracking the motion of the particles of a fluid were a fundamental impossibility in physics - if, in fact nothing else whatever were observable than the shape of the space occupied by the water as it varies in time, we should have no ground for the assumption that water consists of movable particles. But all the same we could characterise it as a medium."

The aether is a medium which does not consist of individual particles which can be separatly tracked through time. The aether physically occupies three dimensional space and is physically displaced by matter.

Displaced aether pushing back toward matter is gravity.

Well, Explain gravity in the sense of aether and explain Equialence principle in the contest of aether...

 

[gravitational_aether]

Well, Explain gravity in the sense of aether

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is not the particles of matter which exist in quantities less than in any vacuum artifically created on Earth which are pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

It is the aether, which the particles of matter exist in, which is the interstellar medium. It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

and explain Equialence principle in the contest of aether...

‘Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image’
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

“This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a “dark core,” containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. “This result is a puzzle,” said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. “Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it’s not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.”"

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Non-baryonic dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

Aether has mass.

An objects resistance to acceleration is the force of the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the object.

Inertial mass is the mass of an object as it is accelerated with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists. The object displaces the aether as it moves through the aether. Since it is accelerating the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout the object is not equally applied to the object.

Gravitational mass is the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout an object. When you are standing on the surface of the Earth the aether displaced by the Earth is pushing down and exerting inward pressure toward you.

Both are the same phenomenon. Both are discussing the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward an object.

Relativistic mass is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

 

[ash64449]

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is not the particles of matter which exist in quantities less than in any vacuum artifically created on Earth which are pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

It is the aether, which the particles of matter exist in, which is the interstellar medium. It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.



‘Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image’
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

“This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a “dark core,” containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. “This result is a puzzle,” said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. “Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it’s not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.”"

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Non-baryonic dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

Aether has mass.

An objects resistance to acceleration is the force of the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the object.

Inertial mass is the mass of an object as it is accelerated with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists. The object displaces the aether as it moves through the aether. Since it is accelerating the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout the object is not equally applied to the object.

Gravitational mass is the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout an object. When you are standing on the surface of the Earth the aether displaced by the Earth is pushing down and exerting inward pressure toward you.

Both are the same phenomenon. Both are discussing the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward an object.

Relativistic mass is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

You said,the faster an object is moving with respect to aether,more the object displaces the aether...But you have to consider this one also.. When you actually falling downwards,you are actually pushing aether more,which means,you should actually experince more gravitational force, which is not the case.. Think like this,when you stand,you displace less,when you accelerate,you displace more..that is why falling down,acceleration.Displace more,gravitational more..I am so sure according to your theory aether does not actually move..

 

[gravitational_aether]

You said,the faster an object is moving with respect to aether,more the object displaces the aether...But you have to consider this one also.. When you actually falling downwards,you are actually pushing aether more,which means,you should actually experince more gravitational force, which is not the case.. Think like this,when you stand,you displace less,when you accelerate,you displace more..that is why falling down,acceleration.Displace more,gravitational more..I am so sure according to your theory aether does not actually move..

As you are falling down you are pushing the aether more. However, there is much more aether displaced by the Earth which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the Earth which is pushing you down toward the Earth.

Einstein said the aether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid. I do not know, at this time, how you could actually detect motion of the aether itself. That is why the correct term, at this time, is to describe the state of the aether as determined by its connections with matter as the state of displacement of the aether.

 

[ash64449]

As you are falling down you are pushing the aether more. However, there is much more aether displaced by the Earth which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the Earth which is pushing you down toward the Earth.

Einstein said the aether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid. I do not know, at this time, how you could actually detect motion of the aether itself. That is why the correct term, at this time, is to describe the state of the aether as determined by its connections with matter as the state of displacement of the aether.

I don't understand you logic, It will actually increase the gravitational effects on you!!! Or i haven't understood your logic. According to me,only movement of aether could explain equilance principle. And also aether doesn't seem to be consistent for me.

 

[ash64449]

As you are falling down you are pushing the aether more. However, there is much more aether displaced by the Earth which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the Earth which is pushing you down toward the Earth.

Einstein said the aether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid. I do not know, at this time, how you could actually detect motion of the aether itself. That is why the correct term, at this time, is to describe the state of the aether as determined by its connections with matter as the state of displacement of the aether.

Yes,only movement can explain it.It will actually increase the gravitational force. Only movement of aether can solve this problem.But if aether can move,there is even bigger problem!!!

 

[gravitational_aether]

Yes,only movement can explain it.It will actually increase the gravitational force. Only movement of aether can solve this problem.But if aether can move,there is even bigger problem!!!

Einstein defined motion in terms of the aether as the aether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time. This is different than displacement.

Displacement explains the gravitational force.

Aether is displaced by matter.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

The Milky Way's halo is what Einstein referred to as curved spacetime.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter IS gravity.

 

[ash64449]

Einstein defined motion in terms of the aether as the aether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time. This is different than displacement.

Displacement explains the gravitational force.

Aether is displaced by matter.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

The Milky Way's halo is what Einstein referred to as curved spacetime.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter IS gravity.

Well,you haven't explained Equivalence principle in terms of it. And also i told you only movement of aether can explain it.But movement of aether can create more problems.We actually do not observe that problem..

 

[gravitational_aether]

Well,you haven't explained Equivalence principle in terms of it.

‘Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation in NASA Hubble Image’
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012...Dark_Core.html

“This technique revealed the dark matter in Abell 520 had collected into a “dark core,” containing far fewer galaxies than would be expected if the dark matter and galaxies were anchored together. Most of the galaxies apparently have sailed far away from the collision. “This result is a puzzle,” said astronomer James Jee of the University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. “Dark matter is not behaving as predicted, and it’s not obviously clear what is going on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.”"

The dark matter core does not defy explanation. The dark matter core is not a puzzle. The dark matter core is not difficult to explain. It is obviously clear what is going on.

Non-baryonic dark matter and galaxies are not anchored together. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

Aether has mass.

An objects resistance to acceleration is the force of the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the object.

Inertial mass is the mass of an object as it is accelerated with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists. The object displaces the aether as it moves through the aether. Since it is accelerating the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout the object is not equally applied to the object.

Gravitational mass is the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout an object. When you are standing on the surface of the Earth the aether displaced by the Earth is pushing down and exerting inward pressure toward you.

Both are the same phenomenon. Both are discussing the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward an object.

Relativistic mass is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

And also i told you only movement of aether can explain it.But movement of aether can create more problems.We actually do not observe that problem..

Einstein defined motion in terms of the aether as the aether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time.

Motion is different than displacement.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

Displacement explains the gravitational force.

Aether is displaced by matter.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

The Milky Way's halo is what Einstein referred to as curved spacetime.

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter IS gravity.

 

[gravitational_aether]

'An Extended Dynamical Equation of Motion, Phase Dependency and Inertial Backreaction'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3458

"We hypothesize that space itself resists such surges according to a kind of induction law (related to inertia); additionally, we provide further evidence of the “fluidic” nature of space itself."

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid, a supersolid, which is described in the article as the 'fluidic' nature of space itself. The 'back-reaction' described in the article is the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter.

 

[ash64449]

"The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object."


When Object is falling Downwards,THAT IS OBJECT IS TRAVELLING FASTER,SO IT SHOULD DISPLACE MORE AETHER,SO IT SHOULD INCREASE ITS MASS.we do not observe this.


"Inertial mass is the mass of an object as it is accelerated with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists. The object displaces the aether as it moves through the aether. Since it is accelerating the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout the object is not equally applied to the object."

"Relativistic mass is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object."

Both these ideas seem to conflict each other.. Faster is same as accelerating.....

 

[ash64449]

"The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object."


When Object is falling Downwards,THAT IS OBJECT IS TRAVELLING FASTER,SO IT SHOULD DISPLACE MORE AETHER,SO IT SHOULD INCREASE ITS MASS.we do not observe this.


"Inertial mass is the mass of an object as it is accelerated with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists. The object displaces the aether as it moves through the aether. Since it is accelerating the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout the object is not equally applied to the object."

"Relativistic mass is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object."

Both these ideas seem to conflict each other.. Faster is same as accelerating.....

 

[gravitational_aether]

"The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object."


When Object is falling Downwards,THAT IS OBJECT IS TRAVELLING FASTER,SO IT SHOULD DISPLACE MORE AETHER,SO IT SHOULD INCREASE ITS MASS.we do not observe this.


"Inertial mass is the mass of an object as it is accelerated with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists. The object displaces the aether as it moves through the aether. Since it is accelerating the force exerted by the displaced aether toward and throughout the object is not equally applied to the object."

"Relativistic mass is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object is moving with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object."

Both these ideas seem to conflict each other.. Faster is same as accelerating.....

The faster an object is moving with constant velocity with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

The analogy is a boat and its bow wave. The faster the boat moves with constant velocity through the water the greater the bow wave. The 'relativistic mass' of the boat is the mass of the boat and the mass of the water connected to and neighboring the boat which is displaced by the boat.

A particle moves with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists. The faster a particle moves with constant velocity with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the greater the displacement of the aether. The greater the displacement of the aether connected to and neighboring the particle moving with constant velocity the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity#Controversy

"In reality, the increase of energy with velocity originates not in the object but in the geometric properties of spacetime itself."

The geometric property having to do with relativistic mass physically exists in nature as the state of displacement of the aether connected to and neighboring the object moving at constant velocity with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists.

 

[ash64449]

The faster an object is moving with constant velocity with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the more the object displaces the aether the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

The analogy is a boat and its bow wave. The faster the boat moves with constant velocity through the water the greater the bow wave. The 'relativistic mass' of the boat is the mass of the boat and the mass of the water connected to and neighboring the boat which is displaced by the boat.

A particle moves with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists. The faster a particle moves with constant velocity with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the greater the displacement of the aether. The greater the displacement of the aether connected to and neighboring the particle moving with constant velocity the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity#Controversy

"In reality, the increase of energy with velocity originates not in the object but in the geometric properties of spacetime itself."

The geometric property having to do with relativistic mass physically exists in nature as the state of displacement of the aether connected to and neighboring the object moving at constant velocity with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists.

Well,i think you will say that accelerating can cause Object to experience no mass.So the distinction you are telling is acceleration can create no much displacement but constant velocity makes more displacement. Well,i Don't think that is the actual cause... Well,Now explain time dilation and contraction of object's itself when it moves faster in terms of aether...