But in this post I see the same old AN lurking there, not in just lumping all the zoodoscience animals into one group for communal disparagement which in itself shows your insincerity
My my, did you get a psychology degree in the last few months or are you trying to 'diagnose' people who disagree with you?
I lumped you and mpc and Pincho together because I see similar behaviour from you. All three of you proclaim to have some insight into how things work, that your unjustified made up thoughts are worth attention.
If you don't like being lumped with mpc and Pincho then stop acting like them.
but for using the threat to the learning of uninformed and unsuspecting people as the outlandish self righteous egocentric justification for the disdain.
Again with the strong words. Looks like I've ruffled your feathers by pointing out some of the vapidity of your posts.
That is why I point out that you have no self respect and are a poor agent for the professional community.
You seem to love inventing narratives for people. I hardly interact with you and say little outside of something relevant to a physics discussion and you've got me read?
And again with the 'professional community'. I'm not here in a professional capacity. If I were then I'd be different. This is my
free time. Besides, if everyone here had to be prim and proper and adhere to the highest professional standards there wouldn't even be a pseudo section, as by definition it fails to get anywhere close to those standards. Remember, when people ask me to justify myself I do, just as I did with Motor Daddy. The same can't be said for you.
Pseudoscience has a built in disclaimer and all of my musings carry a disclaimer to protect the children every since you first pointed out the danger to me.
You produce pages and pages of stuff which you clearly want to be taken seriously.
You are a low life for not acknowledging that and in fact you started with the ad homs in my threads because I chatted with someone you had already branded with your vile torch, unbeknownst to me. You never changed until very recently and I suspect that something happened in your sad life like I warned you would if you kept up the egotistical antagonism.
Ahahaha!! This shows how desperate you are to invent a narrative for me.
You have previously made accusations about me being obsessed with you. Such accusations would come if I posted more than 2 posts in the space of
months in a thread, if both of those posts were to point out how much BS you spew. Basically you
wanted to imagine you were getting attention. To illustrate you were wrong and to highlight how little attention you were getting I stopped even reading your posts. Remember in your QWC thread saying I'd see you round? Obviously not.
You think you know me from my posts on this forum, which says more about you than about me. If you must know, in the last 5 months things have been going extremely well for me. I bought a car, I got a raise, meeting plenty of nice people at the squash club I joined and just this week I bought my first house.
I was nice enough to give you some space and yet you still invent a slew of nonsense about me. That reflects worse on you than it does me.
You should offer your services to the hacks who want to have their work reviewed before they publish, make a few pounds on the side. I have no disdain for that aspect of your persona.
I've offered that to a number of hacks. None of them have ever taken me up on it, despite making claims they're
absolutely right. Funny that.
But the sentence you used to say that includes the statement that I claim my work is worth listening to. Liar.
So you just start multiple threads and post page long musings at regular intervals because you
don't think it's worth listening to?
We are chatting in the forum set aside for those discussions and you are a waste of human protoplasm for using such a forum for your own egotistical aggrandizement.
It's humerous you accuse me of getting comeuppance for being all antagonistic and adversarial but you certainly love to spit the vitriolic words.
It is dishonest and an example of your low self respect and poor character.
So the fact I have little patience for hacks means I have low self respect? I play nice with people who clearly understand things. I play nice with people who I consider smarter than me. Heck, I work with several. My low tolerance for dishonesty and nonsense and misrepresentation is because those things are
bad.
But you should step up and realize that SciForums and especially the Pseudoscience forum is not a place for professionals to do trade talk; there are more professional places for that.
So you admit I don't have to be here in a professional capacity then? So why do you whine I'm not here in a professional nature? You can 'play' here but I can't? You can be less formal but I can't? And this is a discussion forum. Pseudo doesn't mean "Make up any shit you like and don't get challenged". Pseudo is where you can make shit up and not get it deleted, as it would in the main forum. If you didn't want
discussion don't come to a discussion forum.
No, to you it is a place for the low life professionals like you and CptBork to ridicule sincere laymen with an interest in science to share delusions in a place set out for that and in a forum that condones both the interested laymen chatting and allows the bad agents from the professional community to wallow out here and shoot stun darts.
I thought you said you weren't doing science and have no intention of making it science? So are you a sincere layperson with an interest in science or not?
You on the other hand should have some plans to go somewhere and your voluminous posting will follow you. People that will someday play an important role in your future will be well aware of your character or more appropriately lack of character. You may even make some enemies among the very people who will play those roles and you won’t know it until it adversely affects your future. Bragging about how you smeared someone is as stupid as bragging about drug use online like ... he knows who he is.
Where have I bragged about how much I've 'smeared' someone? Really, provide a link. 'Smearing' implies knowingly saying false things about someone in an attempt to 'smear' their reputation.
Mark my words because I tell you and Cpt this because I'm trying to help you understand that there are repercussions and unintended consequences for everything we do.
I can't help but read this and your last paragraph as "Back off or else". You certainly do get vitriolic when someone doesn't agree with you.
Like I say, low character, obvious low self respect, coupled with an ego you put on over it all to cover the poor self image. Just think about it for once instead of firing back with hateful indignation.
I love how you think you can read me like an open book purely from my comments about hacks, just like you read into the fact I was nice enough to give you space as some terrible thing had befallen me in real life. :lol: I know you're desperate to invent some back story for me which will help you ignore the criticisms I've made but it just doesn't work.
This is dishonesty to the max. Don’t pay any attention to the facts or the truth in the intent of you targets. Make up for them what you want them to be like and attack with all the same old rhetoric in any way which lets your invisible cloak of extreme ego paint someone, anyone, with disparagement and disdain so you can get the thrill of the killing of innocent laymen posting in pseudoscience. Get help before it is too late; seriously.
Brilliant. You describe what you've been doing, making up things about me which have absolutely no relation to what I've said here, like my personal life etc and you
admit it's 'dishonesty to the max' but then project it onto me. Heck, you go as extreme as using comments like 'killing of innocent' and 'get help before it's too late', a clear attempt to bring up parallels to the way serial killers escalate.
You talk about my supposed rhetoric but you're the one embellishing your replies with unjustified fabrications and suppositions. You know nothing about my personal life but you make it up and always some sort of dark miserable existence, because that's what
you want to imagine, not what you can demonstrate. I suppose in that sense it's like your claims about the universe, what you want to imagine, not what you can demonstrate.
Next time you go into one of these length "You've obviously a miserable person, your home life is awful and I draw parallels to killers" rants ask yourself how much of
your rhetoric you can demonstrate and isn't just your wishful thinking.
CptBork who BTW aspires to rise to the level of complete disrespect and false self righteousness that you have risen to.
Does he? Did he say that? Did he tell you? Where's the post? Can you provide a link?
Or did you just invent that motivation for him in another one of your "I'll make up a narrative for that poster who I don't like" sessions?
You have shown some change for the better but this post is clearly back to the old you. Too bad because I was going to give you credit for the improvement, so if you want to paint me as being wrong again, you can paint me as wrong about that. How you respond and I hope it will be thoughtful and meaningful, will be responded to in kind if I decide to waste the effort of helping you again.
So you want me to be 'thoughtful and meaningful' when you've just used language which brings up the analogy of a criminal escalating their crimes, you've made implied comments about "Back off or else" and you've said I must have problems at home, which are supposed sources of my 'poor character' and 'low self respect'? What in your post was thoughtful and meaningful? What in your post could you actually demonstrate, beyond your wishful thinking?
The fact you took me being polite enough to give you room,
explicitly after I'd told you as much, as a sign some problem had happened to me in real life, says it all about you. I don't need to use any vitriolic language or choose names to call you, it speaks for itself and it speaks about you.