how in the hell would i know what is going on inside someone else's head? all i know is what i see behaviorally as a result of that. people aren't mentally ill because of what they hear, they are mentally ill because of what they think and how they behave.
How are you struggling with this. I'm asking you if you think there is
anyone who
thinks they hear god but is actually nuts.
It's a simple yes or no question. Do you think
everyone who hears voices is sane and is actually hearing a spirit/deity of some kind or do you accept at least some of those people are just unwell? Yes or freakin' no?
that's what i'm saying about the fruit of the spirit. people hear things all day long from a variety of sources, spiritual and physical, and they have a responsibility to discern.
How do they discern though? How can you tell if the voices you hear are in your head or from god? Every stayed away a few days straight? When you don't get enough sleep you start hearing things, seeing things move in the corner of your eyes. Ever had a really bad fever and become incoherent, hearing and seeing things not there? Thinking is a biochemical process and if you mess with those chemicals you can think all kinds of crazy stuff and it not be real. You might believe your brain chemistry is normal but it might not be. Someone with a temperature of 102 is not responsible for what they see and hear, they are
ill and they might be convinced what they think they hear is real.
You haven't provided any way of telling between the bat shit crazy and the religious.
we're not talking about robots here. and we're not talking about a chemical imbalance. mz's family member isn't diagnosed with a chemical imbalance. i don't have a chemical imbalance.
And you know this how? And even if you two don't do you think
every person in the world who hears voices definitely doesn't? Does no person with a chemical imbalance ever hear voices? That's obviously not true since we put plenty of nutty people into care and some of them
scream about the voices they hear.
Again and again I've asked you this and you fail to answer.
what chemical imbalance are you referring to? the one you're making up in your head because you don't want to believe in spirits or in god? well, then i could call you crazy now couldn't i?
If you believed in god and didn't hear voices I'd say you were misguided. If you hear voices, god or Santa or Jeff the Sky Pixie (pointy be His hat!) then I'd say you're mentally unwell. The fact some people frame their illness and delusions in terms of religion just makes things worse. The fact we sometimes can't tell between the religious and the insane means that there are unwell people 'hiding' within the community, who would function better in society if they could get some help. Their illness might not just be making them think they hear Jesus, it might be messing with anger or compulsion issues, with their ability to concentrate or interact with people.
oh, and by "reality" you mean "what you believe to be true". right?
What can be demonstrated to be true, repeatedly and to any observer. Hence why I asked if you could demonstrate you're actually talking to something which exists and aren't just mentally unwell. You've repeatedly failed to provide me with a way to tell the difference. Furthermore the claims of people who say they speak to an all knowing god fail to stand up to testing. Thus it is reasonable to conclude they aren't speaking to god any more than the guy locked up in the nut house is speaking to Jeff the Sky Pixie (pointy be His hat!).
honey, don't even get me started about crazy, because i happen to think that about 99.9% of the shit that people do and think every day on this planet is fucking crazy.
Yes, the world is full of stupid, gullible, uninformed, hateful, selfish tools and at times we all fall into some or all of those categories. Has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not you've got a direct line to a supposed deity inside your skull.
greed is crazy. how much of our behavior is driven by that? lust is crazy. how much of our behavior is driven by that?
Actually those are not crazy, they are the extremes which evolution has wired into us. We wouldn't be here today if we hadn't fought our way to the top of the planet's food chain, often literally. Far back in my ancestral past I'm sure there's a few examples of my ancestor living and passing on his genes because he kills another person (or ape-like creature since he might be that far back) for food or shelter or mate. Back when you lived on the edge of starvation your entire short 20 year long life killing someone else for their food meant you lived another day. Unfortunately now that we have enough to survive on we kill one another over 'luxuries' like gold, diamonds, resources. Perhaps in 50 years when the environment is buggered we'll go back to killing one another for essential things.
hate is crazy. bigotry is crazy. destroying the planet is crazy. abusing drugs is crazy. i could go on and on all fucking day. so in the grand scheme of things, i don't think that a guy walking down the street have a conversation seemingly with himself is all that crazy ok? in the grand scheme of things, who fucking cares about that?
If that person hears a voice which is
in his head and acts on it then he's likely to do harm because he'll be acting on information not based in reality. It's the same thing with religion. I'd have no problem with faith if people cut compartmentalise their minds but unfortunately they can't and people's beliefs inform their actions and their actions affect people around them. If your beliefs aren't based in reality then you're more likely to do things which lead to unwanted consequences than if you based your actions in information garnered from reality. Religious books by Bronze Age thugs or voices in your head are
not based in reality.
How do you know the guy muttering to the voices in his head will be okay tomorrow or the day after? What if the chemical imbalance gets worse, because it is untreated? What if he completely detaches from reality? Mental illness is generally degenerative if untreated. Think about what you said and consider if it were another illness. Cancer starts as a small group of cells doing something a little different and it might not cause symptoms or problems. But if you leave it and say "It doesn't hurt not, it's okay" then it'll bite you in the arse. Perhaps your view on illness is a little skewed, you are American after all and your health care system an utter farce, but illness shouldn't go untreated. Here in the UK we don't have the notion of a 'pre-existing condition' and so people aren't afraid to speak up when they are ill.
what communicates with me is identifiable and it's not jeff the sky pixie.
And can you prove this in any way?
my behavior is not irrational.
Doesn't mean you aren't unwell or that it isn't affecting you in some other way or won't become worse in the future.
this communication is not responsible for me causing harm to anyone including myself.
If the argument "It doesn't cause harm to anyone but myself" were valid then a number of laws to do with drug usage would change.
Suppose someone has enough money to never need to work again and they are an alcoholic. They don't have a job to lose and they can afford their drink. Should they be allowed to drink themselves into oblivion? Smoke crack? Shot heroin?
You might retort that with "But their habit might get out of control and they start stealing or hurting people".
Exactly the same can be said for mental illness.
quite the opposite actually. i'm an educated and intelligent person, with a successful career, successful and healthy relationships with family and friends, a successful marriage, i maintain a home, and the people around me come to me for help, advice, and would say that i'm an honest, responsible, intelligent, and enlightened person.
So if someone shot up heroin everyday and could maintain a job etc then you'd be okay with that? If someone is not interacting with anyone else can do they
anything they like to themselves?
If someone was hearing voices which told them to cut off their fingers and toes, and then arms and legs would that be okay since they might otherwise be intelligent people who aren't hurting anyone else? There
are instances of people hearing such voices or being so nutty as to cut off various bits of their own bodies.
And none of those things
don't mean you aren't ill in some way. If someone has a good career and been happily married for 30 years, with kids etc is it okay for them to be a drug addict?
Someone with very slight diabetes might go years without noticing anything but if they don't keep an eye on it then it could get much much worse, when if they'd watched their sugar intake they would never have developed a larger problem.
As I just mentioned, you have a notion of 'pre-existing conditions' in the US. This is partly because its a statistical fact that people with certain conditions will require more medical care and numerous mental problems are on such lists. They come up in questionnaires in regards to family history because problems can develop later in life and you're at increased risk of many things if your parents had them.
Ignoring problems because they seem okay now won't magic them away. And neither will all the prayers to Jebus you can muster.
now there's your evidence, which i'm sure you will blatently ignore because it doesn't jive with what you blindly believe, like some kind of religious person.
You have a serious misconception about what 'evidence' is, but then you are religious. Anecdotes, particularly irrelevant ones, don't count.
If you can demonstrate the voice you hear is telling you things you couldn't possibly know then I'd take you seriously. If you can demonstrate that you
aren't one of the people who have a chemical imbalance and the resultant mental illness (no matter how slight) results in hearing imaginary voices, then I'd take you seriously. And how would you do that? Evidence. Evidence, that thing which relates to repeatable demonstrations which are independent of observer. The criteria I have is precisely the same as I have for your religious claims, if you can demonstrate it in a repeatable manner which meets the criteria of the scientific method then I'll take you seriously. Until then I simply (and I mean this in complete honesty) cannot tell the difference between someone preaching 'the Truth' because 'the Lord speaks to me' and someone talking bullshit because they are mentally ill.