Israel, Palestine and the Arab/Israel Conflict

Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course the Good Guys is Israel, Always.

ter3614.jpg


... because the checkpoints and security is for everyones sake.
But Racist Arab leaders are inciting their population to TRY and look at this as oppression CRAP.
 
Gandhi's grandson to kick off unarmed Palestinian campaign

Gandhi's grandson to kick off unarmed Palestinian campaign

By Amira Hass, Haaretz Correspondent

arun.jpg


The grandson of former Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi, Arun Gandhi, is to kick off a Palestinian campaign for an unarmed, popular struggle against the Israeli occupation.

The campaign is being organized by a group of Palestinian social and political activists in Ramallah, that was formed after a ruling of the International Court of Justice in The Hague against the separation fence and Israel's occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The group's members are anti-fence activists, members of non-government organizations for water and agriculture development, and central Fatah activists, headed by minister without portfolio and Fatah activist Kadura Fares.

Gandhi, head of the M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence in the United States, will be the star speaker in three mass rallies planned in Ramallah, Abu Dis and Bethlehem on August 26. Gandhi said he intends "to promote the philosophy of nonviolence, the approach that nonviolence is the only venue that can solve our problems."

The Ramallah group resumed it ties with Palestinians for Peace and Democracy in the U.S., and reportedly consists of 400 volunteers. The group's leader, Mohammed Al Atar, said they felt "an urgency to find another way to resist occupation."

The link between Al Atar and the Ramallah group was Terry Boulata of East Jerusalem, the principal of a private school in Abu Dis and a major anti-fence activist. The fence separates her home from her place of work and from her husband's family. Boulata said the Hague decision and Israel's High Court ruling to change the fence route strengthens the position of the proponents of an unarmed struggle. Like Al Atar, she said: "The struggle is our right, but we must be creative."

The two then invited Gandhi in order to learn creative ways of fighting against the occupation.

In a telephone call from the United States, Gandhi said he is coming both to learn and to teach his philosophy. "I understand that many bad things happened 55 years ago, but the attempt to get justice by revenge accomplishes nothing," he said. He said he learned that from his grandfather when he was just a boy, and thought of revenge in retaliation to the apartheid and humiliation he felt in South Africa, where he was born in 1934. Gandhi said his father spent 15 years in jail because he refused to obey the apartheid laws.

It is difficult to tell how the Palestinians will relate to Gandhi's tendency to explain violent conflicts by reducing them to private, inter-personal relations. "I've dedicated my life to explain to people how damaging prejudices can be, and how to form better relations. That is the basis of non-violence. Relations must be based on love, understanding and honor, not on negative foundations," he said.

"I will tell the Palestinians that it is their responsibility to change. If the Israelis do not want to listen, it does not mean we cannot act."

Gandhi intends to tell the Palestinians that the essence of violence is that each side justifies it by saying the other side started. "The question is who is more intelligent (to stop using violence) and who has more power to change. I think the Palestinians have a chance to be more intelligent and not act like the Israelis."

The organizers intend to bring thousands to the rallies and record the talks with Gandhi. The events will cost about $200,000, and contributions have arrived from Switzerland and Norway. It is uncertain how much Gandhi can contribute to the Palestinian struggle, but the invitation indicates a considerable part of the Palestinian public is seeking popular, non-violent ways to struggle. "We want to organize a Palestinian peace camp to explain to Israel and the world that our freedom is the key to peace," Boulata said.

[Haaretz Daily]
 
Eh-WAH! I wish him the best! I've been hoping for this for some time. Like the Bush Doctrine, the Palestinian warpath has proven counterproductive in the extreme, and I fervently hope that this long-overdue alternative will gain some serious traction, Insh'Allah.
 
Last edited:
I agree with Hype, Israel will eventually have to come to a realization that occupation is counter-productive to her stance in the world. Israel if current trends continue she will cease to exist within one generation, 2015-20.
 
Any off topic post will and have been deleted.

sorry lets all stick to topic now. I think this was Kiwi123 attempting to show how propaganda over demonizes the israelis, a direct attack on a post M16 did in another thread... perhaps its best I merge that, where was it?
 
Last edited:
Israel is and has been demonized by the media for a long time now.
i've always known that, i've always had proof... however, after watching this movie a few days ago it hit me how real this whole thing is.... how real the bias is, how real the bad intentions are, how effective and instrumental the media is in constructing people's views, how real the damage is.. and most of all its extent.

BBC's initial reports of a massacre were the most damaging, because BBC is widely considered to be the standard bearer for reportage from the world's combat zones. BBC News assignment editor Malcolm Downing tells Himel in the film that, because of its reputation, people are naturally inclined to believe that what the BBC says to be true is true.

"Like everybody, we make mistakes," Downing tells Himel in the film, "and we try to own up to them when we do. . . The correction is lying behind, though. We never catch up. That's true of everybody else, as well as us."

In an ideal world, Himel says, rival media organizations would take a step back and agree not to jump to conclusions until they have a better grasp on what's going on.

"But that's not going to happen. We're all going to come up with our stories as fast as possible, especially in the age of live TV."

The difference, Himel says, for people who really want to be informed and are willing to make an effort, is whether the reporter's approach involves a healthy level of skepticism or whether the reporter is willing to accept first-person testimony -- 'I saw this, I saw that' -- at face value.

BBC showed little skepticism toward initial claims of massacre from the Palestinian side, Himel says, whereas CNN's domestic service was more circumspect.

"Israel" is not an abstract idea or some faceless creature. it's people... mothers and fathers, soldiers and kids...
when Israel is being demonized in the news, people go nuts

and there are victims

in the meantime, the lies keep going, and the deity (a.k.a. "real" people) called "Palestinians" from a fictitious country called "Palestine" continue with their lies,

Hassan Jamil el-Zaneen, a teenage resident of the Gaza Strip town of Beit Hanoun, was killed by Palestinian militants on July 22 after he tried to stop them from using his family’s yard to fire Qassam rockets into Israel.

Islamic Jihad and the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades took responsibility for the slaying but then issued a statement asserting that “Hassan Jamil el-Zaneen fell a martyr” during a clash between militants and Israeli soldiers.

An Aug. 9 letter to the U.N. Security Council and Secretary-General Kofi Annan from Palestinian U.N. observer Nasser al-Kidwa listed the boy among 59 Palestinian “martyrs” who had been “killed by the Israeli occupying forces” between July 8 and Aug. 6.

and the contaminated pool of jurists keep swallowing it whole...
 
There is nothing wrong with Israel. There is something wrong with their nazi style tactics in Palestine.
 
M-16 said:
The fact that there are some friendly soldiers doesn't mean that all of them are. There has been a couple cases of IDF soldiers helping out Palestinians.

Where they giving out doghnuts when they did this to a Palestinian kid at a checkpoint?

PicturesCherie001.jpg
M-16 said:
Funny showing us this picture. I was on my way to the beach with a friend, and he showed me this new non-permanent tatoo he had on his arm, of a davids cross, just like in the picture. This kind of tatoo is pretty much in fashion in Israel, and im guessing it isnt even at all a palestinien child wearing this. Its the lowest form of propaganda to use childly pictures and take them out of context.
 
LMAO, do you expect me to believe that? Wow, im going to see where this picture came from.
 
I emailed the guy who got hold of the picture and asked him.

Anyways, how is it a non-permanent tatoo? It will leave a scar, i did the same to my arm, a Palestinian flag and its there.....
 
M-16 said:
I emailed the guy who got hold of the picture and asked him.

Anyways, how is it a non-permanent tatoo? It will leave a scar, i did the same to my arm, a Palestinian flag and its there.....

Its called a "hinta", considerd in fashion for younge teenagers and older in Israel lately, Its kinda like a sticker, looking quite crude. Mostly with lettering or the israeli star of david. Anyway, it couldnt have been a scar since you saw no inflamashion of the skin or redness, so it wasnt a scab.
 
M-16 said:
Look another victim of the "Good" Israelis, i bet that his new tatoo also came with free doughnuts,

030430_Star_of_David_Carved_on_Arm_of_Awisat.jpg


About the Picture

I found it in a Israeli link : http://www.betselem.org.il/English

I served a few months near shhem in checkpost "avtashim" (guard duty), one of the most boring experiences in my life. Never have I witnessed any agression more than pushes or harsh words in extreme, but it was a relatively quiet sector at the time (2001), so im pretty sceptical about this picture.

I have no idea about the last link you sent me, it might be anything. Still, even if I get to the bottom of this, you will believe what you want to, so it doesnt really matter. Your'e mind was made up years ago.
 
Oth how the hell do you expect people to give two shits about Israel when you say idiocy like this:

in the meantime, the lies keep going, and the deity (a.k.a. "real" people) called "Palestinians" from a fictitious country called "Palestine" continue with their lies,

I am reading a book on Palestine and I can tell you their existence of a people began before the start of the Aliyah into Israel in 1881:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=654611#post654611

I suggest you start reading books not propaganda it goes a long way, it really does. Until you Zionist Israeli’s can understand that there are actual people living in Palestine, until you admit that there is racism against Arabs in Israel, and Apartheid, until you realize that what you are doing is not only illegal but unethical I along with the world have very little compassion for you or your Zionist State. Until you recognize your racism, don’t expect me to care about this:

"Israel" is not an abstract idea or some faceless creature. it's people... mothers and fathers, soldiers and kids…when Israel is being demonized in the news, people go nuts

If you can’t say the same thing about the Palestinians, its really unfortunate that Jews are suffering for the sins of Zionists…
 
Actually the Palestinians are mostly Semites (like the Jews). This is a war between religions, not race. Of course people on both sides like to portray the other as sub-human. I think the problem here is over generalization there are good, kind, pacifistic Israelis and good, kind, pacifistic Palestinians… and then there are the evil conservative Israelis and evil fundamentalist Palestinians.
 
This is a war between religions, not race.
not really. it's not about religion, and not about ethnicity. it's mostly about nationality.
we have over 1 million Muslims and Arabs living in Israel. they are good faithful citizens (most) and are part of the state.
they serve on the police force, they serve in the army (volunteer...not drafted), they are in the government... i don't know how you can argue it's about religion.

Hamas and co. would like to make it about religion and sometimes ethnicity which is why they are acting as if it is, and are trying to turn it into such a conflict... but it's not, and as hard as it is, the Israeli government will not turn it into a religious/ethnic conflict.

leave it to the media to tell all about it though :(
 
Last edited:
not really. it's not about religion, and not about ethnicity. it's mostly about nationality.

BINGO! Oth said it; this is a war of two nationalities that really aren’t that real. Although the Pals have the historical, racial, and cultural aspects of a nation. Zionist’s have well…not much really they would have settled for Uganda or Argentina if they didn’t get Palestine so really their tie is not so much with the land. What bonds Zionists together is their dream to be treated like a Gentile state, and the way to do that is reject what it is to be a Jew.

they are good faithful citizens (most) and are part of the state.

…the Arab citizens were (and still are) considered as marginal, if not external, to Israeli society. (Kimmerling 179)
-----------------------------------
They had limited access, beyond voting , to “Israel democracy” and to many social benefits available to Jews in the areas of welfare, jobs, housing, and other subsidized goods and services. (Kimmerling 180)
------------------------------------
…within Israel, they found themselves on the lowest rung of the social and economic ladder and treated by the majority Jews as a potentially dangerous population. (Kimmerling 169)
-------------------------------------
…the principle in Israeli politics that “no Arab party” could participate in a ruiling coalition nor could any Israeli government depend on “Arab votes” in the Knesset to remain in power was formulated during Ben-Gurion’s day and still holds true today. (Kimmerling 185)

Just a synch of the racism in Israel for you…

they serve on the police force, they serve in the army (volunteer...not drafted), they are in the government... i don't know how you can argue it's about religion.

I think you are talking about the Druze…

the Israeli government will not turn it into a religious/ethnic conflict.

It already has by apartheid policies…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top