Yes.
What?
Yes.
I'd rather not define it or try to define it.
I remember years back, I was talking to some Mormons and on their leaflet, there were enticing questions like "Did you know that families can be together forever?" From the Mormons I knew, this was very important to many of them.
It wasn't until just recently that I have thought about this again, and I have felt a great yearning. Not that I would want to be with my family, the way it is now, forever - but the idea of an eternal perfect family life - I find this very attractive.
By "perfect" I am of course implying 'without suffering'.
If that's what's promised to me by our Lord and maker then I expect Him to deliver. How He does it isn't my concern.
Eternal existence is characterized around being cent per cent socialized around the loving service of god.
god doesn't require it
we do
servitude is only a dirty word in conditioned existence since the whole thing is artificial. No conditioned soul is capable of fully surrendering to another conditioned soul and no conditioned soul is worthy of such surrender. Still the material game of material masters and servants goes on, while our actual identity as a servant and god's identity as the master goes on in the background ....
What is it exactly that you find abusive about accepting a role as a servant in a loving relationship?
It doesn't even make sense in the material world, what to speak of when you extrapolate it to the spiritual world (IOW in what way is a mother who loves her child abused in the relationship? In what way is child who loves their mother abused? In what ways do they attain a higher state of existence if they are not burdened by such a relationship?, etc etc)
You are welcome to define the term if you use it. It seems like you are assuming it is best for the OP writer to define the term first. That could work. On the other hand it might limit the discussion first to an argument about the meaning of the word, even amongst people for whom the word is not used and/or is not important. I notice that people do use this word and have beliefs based on it, often that it will be good to live eternally. Given that people believe this, I wanted to hear what those who believe in and use the term find appealing about eternal existence. From that discussion I will get their definition of eternity, while possibly working in parallel with other defintions that other people have.I've noticed a lot of religion consists of arguing about undefined or poorly defined terms and concepts.
.It seems to me that any experience would be unbearable should eternity run too long and any experience would be bearable as long as eternity was sufficiently short
Potential boredom or indifference. The possibility that terrible things are somehow necessary to give life its vitality or dynamism and that eternity, if it had these, would be unbearable, and if it lacked them would be lacking, and eternally.What?
welcome to the material world, the wonderful alternativeOriginally Posted by lightgigantic
Eternal existence is characterized around being cent per cent socialized around the loving service of god.
”
Seems like hell to me.
meanwhile wring your hands as you are assailed by desire and attachment to things that will shortly not exist, from dead hamsters to fleeting youth ...“
Originally Posted by lightgigantic
god doesn't require it
we do
”
Maybe you do.
Since it happens so rarely, I'd like to mention that I agreed with you, Stranger, generally, in this last interchange with LG.Am I on Candid Camera!?!
1111
Potential boredom or indifference. The possibility that terrible things are somehow necessary to give life its vitality or dynamism and that eternity, if it had these, would be unbearable, and if it lacked them would be lacking, and eternally.
Please note: I am not saying that my concerns are correct, simply that I have feelings of repulsion ALSO in relation to eternity.
Do you imagine this eternity playing out in a certain way? I mean, what you would be doing with your time, etc? Would there be goals?
I've noticed a lot of religion consists of arguing about undefined or poorly defined terms and concepts.
It seems to me that any experience would be unbearable should eternity run too long and any experience would be bearable as long as eternity was sufficiently short.
Eternity will last forever. No one really wants to live forever, trust me.
Hm. If my teeth would take forever to rot, then they wouldn't actually rot, right? So in eternity, I'd actually keep my teeth, and in a good state at that! And if this same principle is applied to other things - like worn knee joints, blocked arteries, greying hair etc. - then eternity would actually be quite nice. No rotting of teeth, no wearing of knee joints, no greying of hair ...
I once died and was dead for over 3 minutes and this is all I remember about the time I was dead. They revived me or I wouldn't be here today to enlighten you as to what lies ahead for us all.