Lucysnow1847049 said:
Why is it Emmz that you have to go to extremes on this subject?
I don't feel I am. Obviously all my opinions on the subject can't be fully expressed on a discussion forum. If they come across as black and white then perhaps that's not because of my views but the way they're interpreted.
Lucysnow1847049 said:
I explain that no matter what people 'say' people are cheating on their spouses or partners, its a suggestion that many people are in reality not monogamous in long term relationships. You go and assume that I am suggesting married people should have affairs. People who are monogamous for whatever reason seem to be in the minority but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be monogamous.
I don't feel like I was assuming anything. The last part of this statement confuses me. This was what my argument all along.
Lucysnow1847049 said:
Dude don't you get it! Its not a question of 'delusions' its a matter of desire. Society pressures people to lie about monogamy because they force people to lie about their desires, to feel shame for their desires. Its a puritanical attitude at best. People will shag outside of their base relationships no matter what society or religion has to say on the matter. Its a reality.
I might not get it. Not entirely. But I do think desire, or uncontrolled desire
is a delusion. I'm not convinced it's society that moulds us into who we are. I'm not a product of my societal constraints. I also do not think society is a governing factor in the guilt people feel for cheating (outside of nonomic relationships). I posit it is
we who feel guilt because we have perhaps gone against our own values, or broken our own moral code. If society's pressures were that endemic we wouldn't
have affairs, let alone feel guilty about them.
Lucysnow1847049 said:
It is this attitude which determines that a straying partner will lie, because of the whole 'oh you've abused trust blah blah blah'. Our society has unrealistic expectations and therefore an unsophisticated response to the subject. A sophisticated response it to throw the whole notion of trust out the window so that both partners can come to a realistic understanding of what is going on in the relationship.
If one is in a nonomic relationship then no deceit takes place.
If one is in a monogamous relationship then a "straying partner" is acting in a deceitful way. It's not the fear of being reprimanded that causes the strayer to lie, it's the nature of deceptive behaviour which makes them lie. Perhaps society does have unrealistic expectations of us, but really, who cares what others think? We certainly don't live our lives by what conformities are set upon us. Perhaps I am unsophisticated, I don't know, that's your opinion. Which you are very well entitled to. I do think agreeing to having an open relationship is good, but we're talking (or at least I am) of cheating in a monogamous relationship.
Emmz: Say if someone was married for 10 years and they've come to a place where they're mostly platonic now. One, or both, parties have sexual desires for another and they go and have sex with them. It's completely understandable. Does that mean they should be open with their partner and tell them what's going on, or should they just leave that relationship the way it is and have sex with another person to satisfy their own desires/needs?
Lucysnow1847049 said:
That would be up to them wouldn't it. I mean you seem to think there is a cookie cutter (a=b=c) response to such situations without acknowledging context. In other words it depends on the people, the relationship, hell sometimes it even breaks down to finances and children. You seem to think that someone just gets up one morning and says 'I'm going to have an affair today because of this that and the other' NO! Sometimes it is something that just happens. Can you imagine a married couple that isn't platonic and then one partner gets blind-sighted by a strong attraction they feel the need to experience? Your thinking seems so black and white.
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear in my response, however I do feel I stipulated mitigating circumstances would be a factor. I certainly didn't mean to suggest there was one answer for all circumstances. You use of the words "straying" and "blind-sighted" also suggest to me an inner conflict for said "blind-sighted strayer". But that would be an assumption on my part, for which I apologise for.
Emmz: Or do you think that it's that partner's failing for believing in the understanding most people have of monogamy.
Lucysnow1847049 said:
No Emmz, its the idea in itself that we are saints and that engaging in our erotic desires is somehow a 'failing'. Monogamy like I said is an inspiration not a duty.
I do agree with you that people
do have affairs. I don't, however, see that as a failing. I'm merely saying if people want sex with other people they shouldn't be in a monogamous relationship. The fact that people suffer from delusions isn't a cause for judgement, it's a cause for compassion. I'm not sure how monogamy is an inspiration, and for whom.
Emmz: I agree, what society expects and our behaviour are two completely different things, but how do we resolve that realistically?
Lucysnow1847049 said:
Study the French. Just kidding. If we had mature expectations of the nature of relationships then many would engage in a mature dialogue with their partners, but alas...
And that's my point. We should be honest.
Lucysnow1847049 said:
Black and white thinking again. Why do you assume it means a lack of love for you? Why do you assume that it means the partner would even want to leave? And as for the last statement, you can never be sure its never happened to you. Want to know why? BECAUSE PEOPLE LIE!
Maybe I am black and white, I'm not sure. Sometimes I think things have a logical conclusion, perhaps that's black and white. I assume it means lack of love because if I love somebody, I love them. I cherish them, think of their needs, want their happiness, want them to be free from suffering. Cheating on them doesn't fit into that, it's contradictory to my definition of love.
I don't know for sure if I've been cheated on, like you say. But I'm a pretty spot-on judge of character and I can see through people's shit, so if I had been cheated on, I'd have a good idea.