You can observe a person's thought to some extent. What is better however is to observe actions.But you can never observe a persons thoughts, so when a loved one tells you what they are thinking and you trust them, it is faith based.
You can observe a person's thought to some extent. What is better however is to observe actions.
For example, there were many occasions in my twenties when I was less than trustworthy, and it showed up in my actions very clearly. A few people lost faith in me...and for good reason.
I cant deny it no.but you cannot deny that taking somebodies word for something is faith based as you do not have hard evidence to base it on.
I cant deny it no.
Taking somebody's word without knowing their past is FAITH.
TRUST however...has the opposite meaning.
If it's just YES or NO then I pick YES it's bad to believe in Xenu .. Oh, I mean Allah or FSM ... whichever, they're all the same. I fail to see how a strong belief in Xenu or Allah or FSM is going to benefit overall society at our stage of development. That said, some places, perhaps Pakistan or India, Arabia, Iraq ... yeah, they're probably better off worshiping Xenu or FSM etc...
Xenu is a God for some people. People who worship Him. So, in a sense you are asking me: Is it good that we continue to teach children to believe in Xenu? Well, my personal opinion is that some societies have reached a stage (maybe) where it is no longer necessary to teach people to believe in Xenu - and actually, teaching people to believe in Xenu may actually stunt further development. So, I'm speaking about Japan, China, Australia, Europe, USA, Canada, England... BUT, in places like Pakistan, India, Thailand, Indonesia, Iraq, Afghanistan, KSA, well, there it's probably important that they are taught to believe in Xenu.
Now, all of that said, I think the West and Japanese have the right balance when the religion is open-minded. For example, some liberal minded Christians religion teach that Buddhism is also a valid beleif system. And of course Buddhists can easily accommodate other beliefs (poly and monotheistic). So a society were people have some access to superstition seems to be better than one that squashes it completely. If the superstition is open minded and liberal then sure, it's probably OK for some people.
I'm gong to raise my child (when I have one) to give offerings to the aboriginal Gods... at least while they're still young.
Smelling flowers does benefit society. Perhaps even instilling an appreciation for nature, which is important - at least to me.
Again, past experience is evidence.But just because you know things about a persons past does not mean you know for a fact that they are truthful. It is still faith based unless you have actual evidence.
*************Depends on the outcome, Would you want to be told the exact day and hour you were going to die?.
*************Is it bad to believe in God? simple question yes or no.
We are talking about having faith in God, not following a set of rules and scriptures.
Is it a bad thing?.
*************MW-I take it you have never heard of the courage given by the knowledge that your "big brother" is right there, waiting to help you? Insert God for Big brother and you have a comparison. What is wrong with hope? How does having false hope hurt anyone? Most of the religions I am familiar with suggest that God places worldly ways for us to find help. Thus pushing us toward self-reliance. It DOES allow us to accept things which cannot be changed, or would you suggest that we can fix any situation we get ourselves into? Expecting this I offer a diagnosis of cancer, non-operable. The kind of thing that there is a limited amount you can do, but otherwise, death is a comin. How would you propose that a person, through self-reliance, could overcome this? I agree, it could be accepted, but I would suggest that the person looking forward to "heaven" will have an easier time facing death than the person looking forward to ???.