How did you know what my research is? I've spent weeks drawing leprechauns in LaTeX code! Well, if someone else has already thought of it I'll move onto my next big idea, dolphins riding underwater giant squirrels are the cause of earthquakes! Perhaps Nicholas Marks could assist me?You might as well have drawn tiny little leprechauns on unicorns pulling the cell apart
How did you know what my research is? I've spent weeks drawing leprechauns in LaTeX code! Well, if someone else has already thought of it I'll move onto my next big idea, dolphins riding underwater giant squirrels are the cause of earthquakes! Perhaps Nicholas Marks could assist me?
I'll move onto my next big idea, dolphins riding underwater giant squirrels are the cause of earthquakes! Perhaps Nicholas Marks could assist me?
I've spent more years doing research than sitting in lecture theatres. Now while I could write a very long rant about how there's plenty of people coming out of universities with PhDs who don't have a creative or original neuron in their brains it is not necessarily the case that having formal education limits ones originality or creativity. Knowing things isn't a hindrance to creativity.You are so used to being taught by lectures that the ability to bend your own minds around solutions has been lost to you.
You don't have a model, you cannot model anything.Using my rough model we bring the living cell into the universal arena.
Can you formalise any of this or are you just throwing out buzzwords?The seed-state or at-rest state is the most profound because here energy is shared with the cell. The spinnerets harmonics are stationary and chemical processes are dominant...hence the restructuring of dna. The problem is that we use this stored energy as physical energy so that it isn't available to the spinnerets when they are stirred back into action. Hence, slow deterioration of bodily functions. Nervous energy, supplied by the spinnerets, should not be wildly used as strength for the body...that is the job of chemical energy.
Mind over matter isn't a good strategy as far as our long term health is concerned.
I keep wondering why the same concepts keep appearing in people's minds in all societies and in all eras - the idea that matter is made of things we cannot perceive and measure except by the results. I am uneducated and damaged, and so I am disposed to doubt my capacity to be balanced and reasonable, but in my research of ancient ideas, I keep coming across invisible forces much more powerful than matter, that cause the existance of it and remain interactive as well. Is your idea another attempt to galvanise this view by what we accept in science? Surely science needs a greater context than the 'visible' only.