I was thinking of a hard debate before I leave...But since that is impossible with all the posters here...I typed this today to annihilate atheism's philosophy.......(This is my farewell post, my last one......)
Originally posted by Oz
Where is the evidence of God?
Originally posted by Oz
"FACT THAT MANY ARE MARTYRED, BILLIONS BELIEVE, NUMEROUS WERE HEALED AND TESTIFIED, SCIENTIFICALLY INVESTIGATED, MIRACLES DOCUMENTED FACT (SUPERNATURAL CLAIM REQUIRES SUPERNATURAL EVIDENCE)........LETS IGNORE ALL THIS CONVINCING EVIDENCE...... "
You think that is convincing evidence?
"Take from the church the miraculous, the supernatural, the incomprehensible, the unreasonable, the impossible, the unknowable, the absurd, and nothing but a vacuum remains."
Robert G. Ingersoll (Ingersoll's Works, Vol. 1, p. 285)
Originally posted by Oz
Truly I say unto you, ATHEISM HAVE NO ARGUMENT TO DISPROVE GOD, ....STUPIDITY IS THE KEY TO ATHEISM.......
Actually reason, common sense and the scientific method are the keys to atheism. Stupidity is believing in something irrational purely on faith. The argument to disprove God is that there is no rational evidence of his existence.
Originally posted by Oz
FACT, THEY CAN NEVER PROVE THAT GOD DONT EXIST, PERIOD........YOU THINK YOU CAN??? WELL THEN, TELL ME, IM WAITING.........
What about the fact that you can never provr that god does exist? The burne of proof is on the proponent of such an extraodinary claim. (see carl Sagan's qoute above).
Originally posted by Oz
And regarding christian/judeo religious thinking:
"We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes."
Gene Roddenberry
Originally posted by SpuriousMonkey
why i do not believe in god...
first problem:
which god or gods should I believe in?
Originally posted by SpuriousMonkey
second problem:
i do not accept authority (blindly)
Originally posted by SpuriousMonkey
third problem:
There is no indication that a god/multiple gods exist
Originally posted by SpuriousMonkey
fourth problem:
religion claims to have the truth: there is no truth
Originally posted by SpuriousMonkey
fifth problem:
i am an individual. I don't want to belong to a group.
Originally posted by SpuriousMonkey
sixth problem:
religion harms people. I do not want to be harmed unneccesarily
Originally posted by SpuriousMonkey
shit...could probably go on forever with this list...
Originally posted by SpuriousMonkey
why i should believe in god:
first: i can't think of any reason....which would be a good reason to not to believe in god
Originally posted by Voodoo Child
Testimonial evidence is non-verifiable so is useless as an objective proof. It can be explained equally well by psychology and sociology. Besides, if you are going to use fallacious appeals to popularity then the majority of the world does not believe in your God. Ergo, he does not exist.
Originally posted by Voodoo Child
Non sequiter. If God did not exist and people believed he did they would still die and build churches. All that is required is their fervent belief. There are buildings that have been built for secular gatherings and atheistic religions which would be evidence of your God's non-existence, would it not?
Originally posted by Voodoo Child
There. Your argument is crap.
Originally posted by williamwbishop
That was such a load of BS.
"what evidence of king henry existed"...please, let's see, letters to him, from him, paintings, sculptures, documents from other nations governments regarding him(france, italy,etc...), historians, etc.....
What a nut. He just wanted a parting shot that he would never seen shredded. How can someone be that moronic?
Perhaps. At the very least, we can use the promise as a barometer of your integrity. I, for one, sincerely hope that you prove capable of keeping your word.Originally posted by whatsupyall
(This is my farewell post, my last one......)
I see where he's coming from on this one. But we have evidence to say that King henry exsisted but we have no real evidence that god exsistswhat evidence of king henry existed
Originally posted by spuriousmonkey
it might suprise you but history is science too...they even teach it at university and they even publish papers in scientific journals.
Originally posted by whatsupyall
I was thinking of a hard debate before I leave...But since that is impossible with all the posters here...I typed this today to annihilate atheism's philosophy.......(This is my farewell post, my last one......)