i've simply had plenty of conversations with people on this forum, who are so tied to their beliefs (seemingly egotistically and arrogantly), that they are not open-minded at all regarding experiences that they have never had, and that other people like me, testify to. and i think that's weird. and i wonder, if those people, who so adamantly label anyone who testifies to a paranormal experience as a liar or insane, actually had a paranormal experience themselves.
I think discussions about such topics are psychologically and philosophically very complex.
For example, I, in othe other hand, wouldn't expect that anyone would want to talk, on a public forum, to a bunch of strangers, about what they felt were "paranormal experiences".
Everyone could be right, given the parameters they individually operate from. It's just that usually, we don't know all those parameters.
Someone said that the basis for all communication is misunderstanding.
If we would understand eachother perfectly from the beginning on, there would, paradoxically, be little or no communication.
you make a good point here. i guess insanity is relative. i think that it's insane to continue doing something that you know is wrong, detrimental, destructive. we all do that to some degree. i do.
I think there are always good reasons for why people engage in what appears like destructive behaviors.
And that it is impossible to just give them up, even when one sees they are destructive.
I also do not think one can "reconcile" such experiences on one's own, nor simply with the "support" of "loved" ones.
with what then?
With superior knowledge.
Left to ourselves, we are limited to our own experiences, the accounts of experiences of others, and to logical reasoning. We see, on a daily basis, how this kind of knowledge cannot truly satisfy our desire to understand.
It is only a knowledge that comes from a superior source that can.
actually, i think the only difference between people consists of their experience, and their degree of open-mindedness. and i think those two attributes are correlated.
It is hard to be open-minded if you're not sure whether it is worth it.
"Objective" and "healthy" according to whose standards?
society's ultimately. we're all born into a construct that determines how we live for the most part.
Society is relative, it changes. As such, it cannot give ultimate guidance.
Being normal by the standards of an abnormal society means to be abnormal.