When the person comes to me and says to me that I was right about what happened to them after I told them astrologically, which I did nothing more than look at their chart and tell them what was coming up in their chart, then how is that not true. If I see certain issues and events coming up in their chart and point it out to them, how is that not true. How they handle the issues and events are up to them, that is choice.
Good. Then you are leaps and bounds beyond the thread starter. His claim had a 'what' without evidence. Your claim has a 'what' and a 'how' with 'testimonials'... the most unreliable kind of evidence for objective truth. I propose an experiment. Lets pick a target such as (Q). Use your charts to make an important and specific prediction about an upcoming event in his life. The prediction should include:
1) Who and / or what is involved.
2) What is the event.
3) How long will the event last.
4) When will it happen (in GMT for compatibility's sake).
5) Where will it happen (specific geography)
6) Why / How it is happening (if applicable).
Send the prediction to a person of your choosing on this forum. Right after the event supposedly comes to pass, the person you chose will ask the target:
* Where were you (5) on / between some time / date range (3) (4)?
* What transpired (2) during that time?
* Who / what (1) was part of that event?
* Why / How did this happen (6) (if applicable).
Lastly, the person will post the original prediction side-by-side with the target's responses. If the answers match up then you will have officially attained a proof (a feat that no other known astrologer has ever been able to do). Success at this means a new discovery about reality that will completely change the world of science and gain you a bit of fortune and fame in the process. Failure at this means you are deluded and are intentionally or unintentionally trying to delude others.
What do you say?