I don't know. Do you?
You don't know what is reality,
but you nonetheless talk about "waking up from dreamworld and face reality"
and you accuse religious people of "magic thinking"?
I don't know. Do you?
Nobody said it was rational
After the point in our evolution where our brains grew big enough to start thinking about such things and put them into some sort of language, no we didn't accept it. That's why we invented religion Example of ancient religion. It is only of late that people are starting to wake up.
You're not quoting my honestly (I'm very surprised).
I'll answer this when you have reread my post and asked a question related to what i REALLY wrote.
It's funny how you think it's so brilliant. It's not even very creative. A magic man that looks like man, talks like man and to some extent acts like man.
1) humans aren't eternal
2) humans didn't create the universe
3 humans are physical creatures
The only difference is he's infinitely powerful.
Like huh??? If somebody wrote a piece of trash fiction like that today, I'm sure it wouldn't sell well. Lord of the Rings is way more creative.
The lack of reason in the debate comes from believing in unnatural things. You can't have a reasonable debate about religion.
What would you say to me if i brought you a stick and said it was magic and could disintegrate people if i pointed at them and said the magic word?
What if i refuse then?
Would you believe my claim?
If you kept refusing, eventually I would just forget about it.
.
I'm just trying to explain to you how i feel about magic sticks.
Unlike you, I would assume that the person who claims he has a magic stick is either crazy, dishonest or has been conned in someway to buy a fake magic stick.
That's also how i feel about other claims like magic jews that can part waters or heal wounds by touching them or invisible men in the sky.
Only an insane person would take comfort in an illusion or suggest to others to take comfort in something they know to be an illusion.
What you are suggesting is that people are basically insane.
What both you and others have said seems devoid of scientific or philoosophical input, but if you insist on this line of reason then I will continue.
Did the human being immediately desire an ''afterlife'', or, did the notion of the afterlife ''evolve''?
1) humans aren't eternal
2) humans didn't create the universe
3 humans are physical creatures
Where would the notion of ''strictness'' and it's relation to a ''father family figure'' come from?
Where in the animal kingdom (assuming evolution) are these traits to be found?
I don't understand this part, could you explain it please?
The wrong thinking ignores what is, as well as pays attention to what isn't—a double error. Then it preaches it as truth and fact, the third error.
I don't have a problem with not knowing everything.
That's reality. We don't know everything, but we can try and figure it out instead of looking for answers in ancient magic books.
Obviously.
But how do you know to whom in particular this applies?