Sure. Why should the ethnic cleansing of large areas of the country be overlooked because the cleansers were Red? Read up on it a little - keep in mind that the different tribes of "native Americans" at the time thought of themselves as separate and independent nations, and did not lump themselves into the colonialist racial categories you so freely employ, and all too commonly used by people who have absorbed an arrogant, ignorant, and racially condescending worldview from somewhere.
Incoming Whites adopted everything from words and forms of political organization to the major plant components of their diet from the earlier Red immigrants, and in turn these earlier immigrants adopted everything from weaving and writing to animal husbandry from the newcomers.
The processes of assimilation created several new peoples, distinct from their forbears - the horse Reds of the Plains, the pioneering Whites of the Appalachians and westward, the small farming and ranching people we now know as Mexicans, the pastoral Navajo, and so forth.
The history of the Red holocaust in North America is mostly an epidemiological study, of disease and its effects. The history of the Jewish Holocaust in Europe is fundamentally different.