History of the Holocaust

Status
Not open for further replies.
last time i checked 20% of americans aren't jewish but given the christians right love affair with revelations....

Since we're on pointless demonstrations of political support (thanks Sam), it's odd that no one ever stops to criticize the massive support of, say, Egypt, Iran and Turkey for the Palestinian side. What could be the connection?
 
So, their partisanship for Israel, to you, translates into the Jewish control of the United States? Their support for Israeli interests means that they run the entire nation - the "ZOG", then?

Name one act of Congress in the last 10 years that put American interests ahead of Israel's or explain why American public opinion is irrelevant where Israel is concerned.
 
Last edited:
Israel's what's called an ally, Sam. Say, why did the US give all that money to Egypt? Oh my god: America is controlled by Egyptians!
 
Nope that was also the ZOG. The US has lots of allies. But if it takes all NATO to get rid of Saddam and ZOG writes a paper on it, it will be done.
 
Already did.See aforementioned book on Lobby. Check how many US senators have two passports

Look at the report written on Israeli policy by Israel firsters.

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” (ACB) contains six pages of policy recommendations for Benjamin Netanyahu. In 1996 Israel’s newly elected Prime Minister relied upon opinion makers, thinkers and researchers to craft the paper. This Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies’ "Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000" included Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser.

http://www.irmep.org/Policy_Briefs/3_27_2003_Clean_Break_or_Dirty_War.html

If you pay attention you may recognise the names. If you ever get around to reading the paper [which you won't] you'll see the policy outlined.
 
Already did.See aforementioned book on Lobby. Check how many US senators have two passports

Look at the report written on Israeli policy by Israel firsters.

Actually, I am reading your report, which is something you don't do for my sources. That's ok. I know you're not really here to learn anything.

Now: this report details lobbyism, not ZOG, Sam.

I also note that it's the only kind of lobbyism you've ever complained about.

allies don't attack your naval vessals

So Israel is in a state of war with the US? Perhaps you'd care to lay out your case...in another thread, though.
 
If you pay attention you may recognise the names. If you ever get around to reading the paper [which you won't] you'll see the policy outlined.


usually dems were the zogists while reps were arabists. it was somewhat of a shift in policy for the reps when w came into office.
 
usually dems were the zogists while reps were arabists. it was somewhat of a shift in policy for the reps when w came into office.

Yeah thats because the left moved to J Street when Americans and Israelis elected rightwingers. J Street is ZOG lite and has become overwhelmingly popular post Gaza. These zoggers get a lot of funding from leftist Zionists and...Muslims.:p

http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=48097
 
Last edited:
Is your hood back from the cleaners?

Oh my god: America is controlled by Egyptians!

So prove your ZOG, Jeb. Until then, starch the hood.

Actually, I am reading your report, which is something you don't do for my sources. That's ok. I know you're not really here to learn anything.

Now: this report details lobbyism, not ZOG, Sam.

I also note that it's the only kind of lobbyism you've ever complained about.

Israel is in a state of war with the US? Perhaps you'd care to lay out your case...in another thread, though.


hysterical much?
 
hysterical much?

Not enough, as far as I am concerned. He should be a gibbering idiot considering how his walls are crashing down :shrug:

I searched mondoweiss for the Bush neocon zogger connection:

As to funding, as I have reported, Sheldon Adelson gave three tranches of $100,000 to the Republican party in 2000. The last one came after Bush’s victory was affirmed by the Supreme Court, in December, and at the very same time Doug Feith, the nebbish lawyer and Zionist, was named an Under Secretary of Defense. Adelson and Feith were both involved with One Jerusalem, which was opposed to the peace process. They got their wish. Bush had nothing to do with the peace process. Feith believes that Judea and Samaria, biblical words for the West Bank, are part of Israel.

What’s money got to do with American politics?

http://mondoweiss.net/2009/10/dumb-...ont-groups-with-nary-a-word-about-israel.html
 
Not at all, unless you think the PA would be calling for the killing of Palestinians without the Israeli occupation.
OK.
Similarly, are the Poles, Lithuanians and Germans congenitally antisemitic?
No.
The focus on the blame is lopsided and that was what I was pointing out.
Are you saying, that primarily, it was not just the Nazis who were to blame, even though they were the initiators of this whole sad affair?
Its not a secret that in all camps Jews were under Jewish kapos, who had the duty of maintaining order, rounding up all the Jews and selecting which ones were to be sent for extermination. If the Jewish kapos were blameless, then so were all the others, including the German soldiers, who were only following orders and could not refuse or desert easily. They all faced the same options and consequences as the Dutchbat that handed over some 8000 Muslims to be massacred by the Bosnian Serbs
I am not saying that the Kapos are blameless, and I did point out the ethical conundrum. I will once again reiterate however, that were it not for the Endlösung, the Kapos would not have been empowered in the first place, thus primary guilt can never be ascribed to them.
Ethically, in my opinion, a large portion of the Kapos acted disgracefully and in utter excess of what was required of them, and are clearly as guilty as their masters. Even though they (majority) eventually went up the chimney themselves.

Are you referring to German Wehrmacht soldiers regarding the Holocaust or the war? It was the SS who were in control of the day to day running of the camps, and in full knowledge of what was occurring. IMO they would carry full guilt as complicit in perpetrating the Holocaust, whether they were following orders or enjoying their work. Akin to those responsible for criminal abuses at Gitmo. From the top right down to the bottom.
 
OK.

No.

Are you saying, that primarily, it was not just the Nazis who were to blame, even though they were the initiators of this whole sad affair?

I am not saying that the Kapos are blameless, and I did point out the ethical conundrum. I will once again reiterate however, that were it not for the Endlösung, the Kapos would not have been empowered in the first place, thus primary guilt can never be ascribed to them.
Ethically, in my opinion, a large portion of the Kapos acted disgracefully and in utter excess of what was required of them, and are clearly as guilty as their masters. Even though they (majority) eventually went up the chimney themselves.

Are you referring to German Wehrmacht soldiers regarding the Holocaust or the war? It was the SS who were in control of the day to day running of the camps, and in full knowledge of what was occurring. IMO they would carry full guilt as complicit in perpetrating the Holocaust, whether they were following orders or enjoying their work. Akin to those responsible for criminal abuses at Gitmo. From the top right down to the bottom.

No one is saying the Nazis are blameless. But even Germans who opposed the Reich ended up in the same concentration camps. Any numbers on them?

I'm saying that if you are going to consider the Jewish kapos under pressure [when they were singing and rounding up Jews by telling them to dress in their best clothes] then its not fair to blame the Poles, Lithuanians and anyone else who was likely to end up in the camps if they resisted
 
I'm saying that if you are going to consider the Jewish kapos under pressure [when they were singing and rounding up Jews by telling them to dress in their best clothes] then its not fair to blame the Poles, Lithuanians and anyone else who was likely to end up in the camps if they resisted

In the first place, nobody "blamed" the Poles, Lithuanians, etc. for the Holocaust.

They were blamed for their generations-long oppression of the Jews in their communities, long before any threat of Nazi persecution might have motivated them.
 
And what was the reason for that oppression? They are all born antisemitic?
 
No one is saying the Nazis are blameless. But even Germans who opposed the Reich ended up in the same concentration camps. Any numbers on them?
Not off the top of my head, but drawing from other similar situations, not too many. The general modus operandi of conscientious objectors is keeping a low profile and doing the minimum.
I'm saying that if you are going to consider the Jewish kapos under pressure [when they were singing and rounding up Jews by telling them to dress in their best clothes] then its not fair to blame the Poles, Lithuanians and anyone else who was likely to end up in the camps if they resisted
Yes, certainly, your point is valid and guilt/innocence should be shared across the board.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top