Have you ever seen anything supernatural?

Lori the purpose of this thread is really complicated and devious. It is... wait for it... to find out if people have seen anything they think is supernatural. I said straight away that I wasn't going to believe it was supernatural, so anyone that posts won't have any surprises when I don't believe it was supernatural.

Feel free not to post Lori.

no i'll post, and i'll say that i think you're being a real pompous asshole with the way you've worded this thread, and if i had to guess i'd say your intentions are in line with that as well.
 
Lori the purpose of this thread is really complicated and devious. It is... wait for it... to find out if people have seen anything they think is supernatural. I said straight away that I wasn't going to believe it was supernatural, so anyone that posts won't have any surprises when I don't believe it was supernatural.

Feel free not to post Lori.

Yeah she's far to judgmental of an overly-religious hypocritical nut job.

She couldn't even read long enough to see that I was joking:


this is so irritating. get a dictionary ffs; what the hell?


Man, I could really run with this:
Define "natural world"
Define "natural forces"
Define "Deity"
Define "divine powers/divinity"
Define Miracles

But naw, I get the picture ;)

I've never experienced anything supernatural while sober. But years ago I experimented with a lot of drugs, and there were times when I saw things that I would definitely have called supernatural at the time. Now I know it was just the chemicals playing with my mind.

Notice above in bold that I answered the question without demanding all the former definitions. See... I was being facetious... Though I wouldn't expect you to understand humorous banter between two people who are obviously much more intelligent than you will ever be.

no i'll post, and i'll say that i think you're being a real pompous asshole with the way you've worded this thread, and if i had to guess i'd say your intentions are in line with that as well.

@ Answers, I would report this if I were you.
 
Yeah she's far to judgmental of an overly-religious hypocritical nut job.

She couldn't even read long enough to see that I was joking:







Notice above in bold that I answered the question without demanding all the former definitions. See... I was being facetious... Though I wouldn't expect you to understand humorous banter between two people who are obviously much more intelligent than you will ever be.



@ Answers, I would report this if I were you.

you say this, "she's far to judgmental of an overly-religious hypocritical nut job" about me and then recommend answers reports me? who's hypocritical? lmao.

joking or not, your posts were irritating, and i'm entitled to my opinion. that was far from intelligent humor. you thought that was intelligent humor? hahaha. now that's funny. :rolleyes:
 
I actually died once and was dead for 3 minutes before they revived me. So I gues you might classify that experiance as a "miricle" as I was brought back from the dead.

i dont want to hear that :( but lets settle this did you or did you not see the lights since you were actually dead
 
No, I have never seen anything Supernatural but if I did, anything could be possible or perhaps probably, including God.
 
Oi some people have gotten aggressive on here. :S

I think that supernatural encounters and the works is limited by that person's knowlege of the world.You can't hallucinate an image of a flower if you didn't know what a flower looks like or see a ghost if you dont know what a ghost is.A Christian with no knowledge of other religions can't possibly have a revelation about Kali and so on.
 
Insertdeityhere, nice theory but wrong. Which study did you read that informed you that hallucinations are always based on something real? Look at the imagination: "The formation of a mental image of something that is neither perceived as real nor present to the senses." Some people paint flowers, some people paint giant monsters, that doesn't make giant monsters real. And if the brain is capable of forming images that are not based on any sort of reality, when the brain is at its natural state, how much more so can it form those images during a hallucination.

As for Lori, go somewhere else to chuck your tantrum please.
 
you say this, "she's far to judgmental of an overly-religious hypocritical nut job" about me [] who's hypocritical?

You have proved through your history here that you are judgmental. Calling answers an asshole virtually without provocation in this thread is a perfect example.
You've also made it clear you are overly religious.
You've also made it clear that you are a religious nut job, as all religious fanatics are nut jobs. No offense was meant by these statements, They are just observations of your character. If you take them as an insult, than the problem lies not in my saying them but in your perception of them, and if you take them as an insult, then they must be a sensitive subject for you, which may infer that you are, either consciously or unconsciously aware of these characteristics and in denial of them and therefore sensitive to them. Its the things that hit home that cause us to feel offended.

and then recommend answers reports me?

So report me.

joking or not, your posts were irritating, and i'm entitled to my opinion.

Again, Your perceptions. Obviously you failed to see the fact that they were supposed to be irritating, but also facetious, and therefore humorous. Obviously you failed to get the humor. Which brings us to...

that was far from intelligent humor. you thought that was intelligent humor? hahaha. now that's funny. :rolleyes:

No I actually didn't think it was "intelligent" humor. Just humor. But since you failed to see it as,
supposed to be irritating, but also facetious, and therefore humorous

Then that leads me to believe that it must be above your level of intelligence, therefore making you unintelligent for not getting the simplest of humor called sarcasm.

But if you want to continue making yourself look the fool, be my guest. Your such an easy enough target.
 
You have proved through your history here that you are judgmental. Calling answers an asshole virtually without provocation in this thread is a perfect example.
You've also made it clear you are overly religious.
You've also made it clear that you are a religious nut job, as all religious fanatics are nut jobs. No offense was meant by these statements, They are just observations of your character. If you take them as an insult, than the problem lies not in my saying them but in your perception of them, and if you take them as an insult, then they must be a sensitive subject for you, which may infer that you are, either consciously or unconsciously aware of these characteristics and in denial of them and therefore sensitive to them. Its the things that hit home that cause us to feel offended.

well said..
Lori..don't get upset at it..it reads more as a challenge for you..
 
Luckily the dictionary has already done the work for me.

Supernatural:
1. Of or relating to existence outside the natural world.
2. Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces.
3. Of or relating to a deity.
4. Of or relating to the immediate exercise of divine power; miraculous.
5. Of or relating to the miraculous.

the misunderstanding tend to be two-fold. those who believe in the idea of the supernatural or miraculous is kind of like the idea of believing money can grow on trees or something can come from nothing. on the other hand, the other side can be the other extreme, dogmatic or narrow-minded and think they know everything about the laws of nature/universe or what can or cannot happen.

we just don't know how everything works or can work. there are unexplainable events that happen. it's just that: they are unexplainable at this time perhaps.

i've noticed an extreme form of stupidity as well from thinking camps which deny anything they don't understand at this time as 'impossible' (which they believe is logic) which ironicly is very similar to those who believe dogmaticly that miracles and the supernatural occurs without understanding what it is.

'logic' in itself is useless if you don't have all the information and therefore cannot be applied correctly. think about all the discoveries that have been made where assumptions of 'logic' or what was believed to be impossible had to be reevaluated. for instance, before we didn't think lifeforms could exist in extreme temperatures but now we know they can. this was before it was discovered. but the thing is, before this discovery you would have those who emphatically even make fun of those who pose the idea and ridicule the idea as impossible. this is just an example.

i've noticed that those stuck on logic and science (meaning they believe science has it wrapped up just like bible thumpers) can be just as stupid or have blindspots as those who ignore known and established truths.

both sides can use faulty logic as well. for instance, if one claim of the supernatural or unexplainable has been debunked as a hoax or found out to be some type of misidentification, the skeptics tend to believe that "all" of them are which is just as idiotic. this is because there are so many different types of events and occurences which cannot all categorically be placed under the same category just because they are all 'unexplained'. your house, storage room or garage probably has all types of stuff in it, yet it doesn't mean those objects are all related.
 
Last edited:
Oi some people have gotten aggressive on here. :S

I think that supernatural encounters and the works is limited by that person's knowlege of the world.You can't hallucinate an image of a flower if you didn't know what a flower looks like or see a ghost if you dont know what a ghost is.A Christian with no knowledge of other religions can't possibly have a revelation about Kali and so on.

Why is it called Kali ? I have heard that before . Like the one still to come ? Is that what the Kali is ? That is strange to Me . Hotel California comes to my mind .

O.K. I seem plenty of shit not easily explained . I had a reoccurring dream that came true down to last detail 7 to 8 years after I first had the dream . I would think that similar situations as of a dream can occur by chance , but this was word for word at a pivotal time in my life . The setting was identical also and the people who I did not know when I had the dreams were identical in the exact same place proportionately . In the dream ( I was about 5 to 6 years old when the dreams started and I was 13 when the dream became a real event . That was way to much to convince me the future has already happened in some weird way . Set in stone .

Was it super natural ? I don't know bout that cause if it happens is it just plain natural ?

O.K. I got one " Me Super Natural Love for all you fucked up Humans . It is supernatural cause if it was only Natural I would not love you all . Hate would be the word of the day if my love was only natural .

Got ya ding dongs

Well I guess you could say I naturally love you if you want cause it was predicted that would . So could it really be super natural then ?

What is supernatural anyway ? What does that really mean . Extra Natural ! Sounds like a good campaign for global greenies to utilize .

Extra Natural organic . It is Super good for you cause it is out of this world tasty for being healthy . Eat your Super Natural Green Beans today ! They will make you a person and one Half . Super People of the future
 
I don't believe in the supernatural. I think that logic and scientific reason can disprove most of your stories, though I might be wrong for I haven't read any of them.
 
I don't believe in the supernatural. I think that logic and scientific reason can disprove most of your stories, though I might be wrong for I haven't read any of them.

i hear this a lot but the truth is this type of reasoning is just as blind or ignorant. you may be able to disprove 'some' unexplained events but you can't disprove all of them. again, this is because we just don't know how everything can possibly work. it doesn't mean that it's miraculous in the sense it goes against the laws of nature, it just means we don't fully know how the laws of nature can manifest in every way. this universe can be a complicated place and we tend to think if something is not known at this time or not able to be reasoned with our five senses, that it must be imaginary.
 
Your blossoming Birch . Yeah I like your posts . They pack a lot in the them . To the point . Realistic points too
 
i hear this a lot but the truth is this type of reasoning is just as blind or ignorant. you may be able to disprove 'some' unexplained events but you can't disprove all of them. again, this is because we just don't know how everything can possibly work. it doesn't mean that it's miraculous in the sense it goes against the laws of nature, it just means we don't fully know how the laws of nature can manifest in every way. this universe can be a complicated place and we tend to think if something is not known at this time or not able to be reasoned with our five senses, that it must be imaginary.

"Impossible is a word the weak use to justify giving up"
I bet the same thing was said by people who thought rain was tears of God.
 
I don't believe in the supernatural. I think that logic and scientific reason can disprove most of your stories, though I might be wrong for I haven't read any of them.

Why don't you explain ? Is it electrons protons ? what are they ? the ones that disappear and then show up in unpredictable places by humans vantage points. What kind of magic trick is that ? Not understood as of yet I believe and very mysterious indeed
 
"Impossible is a word the weak use to justify giving up"
I bet the same thing was said by people who thought rain was tears of God.
Rain is tears of god . Jeeze laweeze . It cries for you so you can eat the bounty of the earths goodness . Don't you have any respect for the world you live on ? It is your Home you know ! Your not a space alien are you ?
 
Back
Top