The star's heavy elements could be stable in the stars but not on Earth....
then you know my comment that periodic table is still not universal.. thanks.. you are brilliant...
The star's heavy elements could be stable in the stars but not on Earth....
Read-only, i know you are unemployed now... please try to find a decent job outside, don't depend on your parent's spoon feed. if you are still young, you always can take a course to study...
I've told you my history and it FAR outshines anything you've ever done. Now... will you please tell us about radio spectroscopy and why it shows your statements to be very, very foolish??????:bugeye:
(And both my parents passed away long ago - I'd thank you not to make such stupid personal remarks about them in the future.)
I know you have a problematic family and education, and even your career. It is very common to have such people in this forum, it does not amaze me...
radio spectroscopy is as easy as peanut to me. Read-only are you a scientist? you lie again. your habit and style is like Sisyphus. you are handicapped or don't have a secured career. Pity of you....
radio spectroscopy is as easy as peanut to me. Read-only are you a scientist? you lie again. your habit and style is like Sisyphus. you are handicapped or don't have a secured career. Pity of you....
Funny how someone who used to be sisyphus will comment here.
Read, how I defended myself awhile ago in exact similar posts:
Radio spectroscopy is as interesting as peanuts to us. Albertchong are you a scientist? I wouldn't know. You're habit, and be it so your style as well, is just like the sun. You are severely shut down or do not have a decent head on your shoulders. Pity!!
hehe..
and yet radio frequency spectrocope that you mentioned can't detect much heavier element. That is your mistake i corrected.
Most of the spectra is beyond the ultraviolet region, of X rays and gamma rays, are detected by suitable ionization detectors. it is just how silly to mention radio spectroscopy. Why don't you mention ultraviolet spectroscopy? x-ray spectroscopy and other? unqualified people arguing with me.... so funny
Only know to 'Read only' radio spectroscopy idiot... nice to know you...
Scott, do you have any idea about interdimensional structure in the universe? how about testing my 4-D idea that can help us warp in space? thanks for your help...
Read. I want to make a comment here.
First of all, I believe (this is going to sound rediculious) his idea (I genuniely believe it) of "4-D idea that can help us warp in space", is very, very dangerous investigation.... If you imagine what it would do to the structure of the world. I imagine something rather twisted.
Anyway, Scott (What I had wanted to say), I believe, has a very good idea of a lot more than what albertchong is asking. In other words, he understands a lot more than he realizes. We realize. Sure, some of his ideas are debunked in our minds, they are debunked at some of the highest grade forums on the planet.
That pretty much dismisses most of these comments. New physics is a long way away and current theory is protected and adhered to, you might say pretty strongly ... (thank God!).
So, ... I think you get an idea where I'm going with this. Just because he is dismissed and debunked, and the ideas would be debunked further upon criticial investigation, I really haven't seen (In Support of Scott's theories), a valid interpretation of some of his ideas most notiably his "balance a nail on a set of scales." Idea.
What then would gravity be if he is right. It isn't like this has probably not been tested before, but his theory has some merrit, upon an inquirer....
Which is not unlike what Read-Only has been saying, but is in conflict with statements of yours including this one: "The electrons are coming from the exited air inside the generator between the magnets and the copper wires and being added to the system."
The UFOs (if there is such a thing) could be using lorentz forces for propulsion which needs extreme magnetic field may be 100 Tesla to produce enough thrust for movement...who knows...this means they must have some kind of nuclear power plant inside or learned to produce giga watts on the fly....
The universe works from the periodic table....Alloys exhibiting levitation without primary force conversion may not be likely....
No, Scott's ideas are just junk science. Consider what he is saying about matter that levitates away from other matter.
Just like the old story of "an acid that will eat through anything", what would they store it in? And Scott's hare-brained idea is a good parallel to that. Any matter that opposes gravity would be quickly flung out to the edges of the Universe - accelerating as it goes. (But he's not smart enough to have thought of that.) Neither is he intelligent enough to realize that practically everything else he says is just nonsense also. Pity.
our periodic table doesn't completely reflect the element in the whole universe. If we happen to be able to fly to one of the star, we will be amaze of some heavier element we haven't discover yet. The radio-isotope, fission and fusion process create some element we haven't understood completely that the gigantic star born and died. So we still have room for improvement for our material study..
Yes. And then what becomes of those ions? They certainly do not cause "free" electrons to accumulate in the battery according to YOUR version of things.
Time and again you've shown that you don't know the difference between a battery cell and a capacitor. And neither do you understand the very simple chemistry of what goes on inside a cell that allows it to store energy and release it on demand.
Why not do yourself a BIG favor and read some basic material about how electricity really works instead of dreaming up your own silly version of it??
True, I guess when you look at the idea of scale balancing in detail that is what you conclude.
My theory is that if it is thrown out the planet then that settles the matter and that there is no need for inquiry. If this is so then we have no reason to believe that gravity can adversely affect a human being. Just a question I guess of "time" and "soul" ('gravity'). I've had some interesting things happen with me before about the issue of gravity in particular. So I was wondering if he just threw in that example of the nail to confuse us, or actually have a similar investigation behind it.
Albert is also inquiring, but he repeats, and repeats it appears.
Perhaps for future generations the word will simply be Scott.The words needed to express the extent of Scott's gullibility and foolishness simply do not exist.