Your analysis is mistaken?.
Then correct it.
Your analysis is mistaken?.
How? On what basis do you make this claim?I know for a fact that there is no such thing as Hell/Heaven or God/s.
How can there possibly be a shred of proof if, as you say, it is a fact that there is no such thing as God? If God does not exist then necessarily God can not care about anything.And even if a God existed then there is no shred of proof that he ever cared about this insignificant planet or about insignificant humans.
They think there is evidence, so that sort of negates them being insane. Certainly if you thought there was no evidence then you would be insane for believing in the thing. But they think there is evidence.People must be insane in believing in these things without a shred of evidence.
Define free will, please?Free will is also an illusion because really there is no shred of proof that humans have or have ever had free will.
Then correct it.
There's no need to correct it.
You should ask Pluto2, and Alex to correct their views. They know for a fact that God does not exist, and they know for a fact that scriptures are made up. That IS knowing everything.
jan.
I have no idea what you're talking about.So if it is an established fact that children are better educated in same sex schools, were they not doing better before establishing that fact?
One common definition of "knowing" something break it down into three requirements:So nobody can know anything before the establishment comes in and deems it a fact?
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Belief in the existence of an afterlife is not justified,
3. The belief must, in fact, be true.
Belief in the existence of an afterlife is not justified, and it might not be true either, so although there is no shortage of element (1) in the world, (2) and (3) are both problematic.
This is why your hypothetical woman does not know there is an afterlife.
But all of this is just another of your diversions - in this case a distraction from the barbarity of a religious requirement that women (not men, just women) commit suicide.
But I'm too dumb.There's no need to correct it.
I have very little interest in having another game of dueling definitions with you, Jan. I realise that is a favorite of yours. I have no intention of getting into an argument about "what is a fact", so I'm not going to start on that one.Does something that has become an established fact, mean it wasn't a fact before it became established?
The usual reason. Insufficient evidence.Why isn't it?
Okay.It doesn't have to be deemed factual for it to be true.
It doesn't. It can, however, serve to highlight the truth of the situation.How does asserting your opinion affect the truth of any situation, let alone this one?
No she doesn't. Such a belief is not justified.Here's the problem. She does know she is a spirit-soul, and that she is immortal.
Well, yes. It is my opinion, drawn from your posts.We only have your word for that.
I have very little interest in having another game of dueling definitions with you, Jan. I realise that is a favorite of yours. I have no intention of getting into an argument about "what is a fact", so I'm not going to start on that one.
The usual reason. Insufficient evidence.
It doesn't. It can, however, serve to highlight the truth of the situation.
No she doesn't. Such a belief is not justified.
I certainly make no apology about labeling as barbarous any religion that requires a women to suicide upon the death of her husband.
If this is your religion, I want no part of it.
But I'm too dumb.
I need your knowledge.
I asked a question.Maybe if you lay of the booze, you may find you're not as dumb as you think.
jan.
I asked a question.
So you can't post anything meaningiful.
Beer w/Straw said:Even though I'ma virgin I'm pregnant because God fucked me while Iwasn't looking.
I know this.
God was a good fuck BTW.
More meaningful discussion I see.
I get the feeling you think I'm offended by this. On the contrary. It is very enlightening for at least a couple of reasons. Let's see what you've got.
Also it proves that people can think and say what they like about God, but it has nothing to do with God.
You still haven't corrected me.More meaningful discussion I see.
I get the feeling you think I'm offended by this. On the contrary. It is very enlightening for at least a couple of reasons. Let's see what you've got.
Also it proves that people can think and say what they like about God, but it has nothing to do with God.
Okay James R?
jan.