E=mc2 questions?

[theorist-constant12345]

And yet you disagree with it and substitute your own unsupported ideas.

A slit or a simple hole would make the light "line up." Try it. Poke a small hole in a paper plate and take it outside. See if the shadow from the plate now has a tiny spot of light in it, caused by the light "lining up."

And yet white light can be used to transmit both a communications carrier signal and information. Here's a patent on that very idea:
http://www.google.com/patents/US5657145

When your logic disagrees with reality, reality always wins. Reality is what keeps on happening no matter what you believe.

My idea was supported when science failed to provide evidence, a prism is not evidence.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

No, with the greatest respect this is totally delusional, and probably also reflects a fanaticism bordering on illness.
The sad part of course is that you will continue to believe and say what you will, even though evidence convincingly says you are wrong, and that stubborness will more then likely [from the evidence so far here] be taken to the grave with you.
Yet in the meantime the world and science moves on, dispelling your nonsensical non science scenarios. So in essence when your time comes, you will go still being a totally delusional human being, making no difference to the world and science in general.
An analogy is a young child reliving a fairy tale, and dressing up for the part. He/She at times is so immersed in their fantasy, that they will refuse to take their dress-up costumes off. In time though, they will grow up, and realise that Santa, the Easter bunny and the good Princess, was just fun times while they were immature.

delusional , here we go again, delusional is fallacy evidence which you insist exists, there is no evidence please feel free to try and find some.

 

[paddoboy]

Trolling again trying to discuss me instead of content. Like you have stated before you do not know all Physics, you are not a scholar etc.

You do not provide logic, your evidence is not logically thought of proper, science fails me, i do not fail science, it is science that i deem to be a big let down, everything is only half looked at and not looked at in great depth.

What you deem or what you think in your obvious delusional state of mind is sad, and as I just posted will not matter to the world, or the science community in general.
Sad, very sad.

 

[paddoboy]

delusional , here we go again, delusional is fallacy evidence which you insist exists, there is no evidence please feel free to try and find some.

No my dear friend, delusional is a state of mind.

 

[paddoboy]

delusional , here we go again, delusional is fallacy evidence which you insist exists, there is no evidence please feel free to try and find some.

And further more it explains why all your material has been shifted to the fringes, and actually on forums more strict with regards to science, has seen you permanently banned.
Again sad.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

What you deem or what you think in your obvious delusional state of mind is sad, and as I just posted will not matter to the world, or the science community in general.
Sad, very sad.

So now you are calling me delusional again, the only evidence you can offer is a prism, a prism has the ability to separate light into wavelengths, I do not see any part of this that suggests light in 3 dimensional space is a mixture of frequencies, that is certainly guess work with no substantiated facts.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

And further more it explains why all your material has been shifted to the fringes, and actually on forums more strict with regards to science, has seen you permanently banned.
Again sad.

And further more blah blah , threads in the fringes, have you got this saved for copying and pasting?

Do you not know any other sentences?

Nice try troll, i am not biting, stay out of my threads if you are not going to be of any help.

 

[Seattle]

How did this site get to this point? I posted (started a thread) in the Site Administration section asking this question but it has gotten no response so far.

 

[paddoboy]

So now you are calling me delusional again, the only evidence you can offer is a prism, a prism has the ability to separate light into wavelengths, I do not see any part of this that suggests light in 3 dimensional space is a mixture of frequencies, that is certainly guess work with no substantiated facts.

That's because you are totally and unquestionably highly delusional.
Just as a child believes in Santa...no harm done in most cases, as long as the child is let grow up and experience reality as it really is.

 

[paddoboy]

And further more blah blah , threads in the fringes, have you got this saved for copying and pasting?

Do you not know any other sentences?

Nice try troll, i am not biting, stay out of my threads if you are not going to be of any help.

I would love to stay out of your nonsensical crap, but my sense of duty for innocents, lay people and children, over rides that.
So post crap/non science on any forum, and It will be refuted. Simple as that, and something you need to live with.

 

[paddoboy]

How did this site get to this point? I posted (started a thread) in the Site Administration section asking this question but it has gotten no response so far.

It does appear to be a failing here.
Although in time, I do see this being shifted again, probably to cesspool.

Another forum I once participated in, gave alternative hypothesis pushers one month to show evidence why what they claimed matched observations better then the incumbent and to answer all probing questions of their hypothesis.
Once that month was up, the thread was closed, if the evidence was not forthcoming.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

That's because you are totally and unquestionably highly delusional.
Just as a child believes in Santa...no harm done in most cases, as long as the child is let grow up and experience reality as it really is.

Seriously I have genuine concerns for your well being, I have a happy family life and in my spare time come on forums, you on the other hand have the need to be on, have the need to try and get people banned and always try to wreck the threads because you push your spamming, the mods commenting telling you I do not break rules, they also said if you dont like it , simply stay out, neither of this do you accept and continue to disrespect the mods .
I ask you for evidence and when the going starts to get tough, your science fails showing the true content of your stay on this forum,
and then your only defence is back to ban the troll.
It is not I whom needs go to see the doctor, your long time on forums has lead to delusions of grandeur, and you are living inside your own head with a false sense of power from limited knowledge and understanding.
I suppose you still think that an energy difference of a Caesium atom can effect time?
I suppose you still think the Universe is the mass contained within what we can see?
You have no idea how the big boys think ,

 

[Seattle]

It does appear to be a failing here.
Although in time, I do see this being shifted again, probably to cesspool.

Another forum I once participated in, gave alternative hypothesis pushers one month to show evidence why what they claimed matched observations better then the incumbent and to answer all probing questions of their hypothesis.
Once that month was up, the thread was closed, if the evidence was not forthcoming.

I don't see why it's encouraged here in the first place as it attracts the opposite kind of poster than what would seem to be the intended audience just considering the name of the site.

Not only is it tolerated but look at all the sub-sub-forums under the sub-forum of "The Fringe". Is there really a need for a sub-sub-forum for "Alternative Theories" and "Pseudo-science"? What legitimate forum have you been a part of that has the word "Monsters" in a sub-sub-forum title?

 

[Dywyddyr]

You are correct I do not know science, but not in the way you think i don't know science

That would be wrong.
You don't know science.
End of.

in a way that I expected more professional attitudes instead of that of fools.

Which just shows that you don't know science.
Science - and scientists - give exceedingly short shrift to out and out bullshit. And the ignorant fools that push it.

you have no evidence

Another lie.

 

[Seattle]

Deleted...accidental duplicate post.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

That would be wrong.
You don't know science.
End of.


Which just shows that you don't know science.
Science - and scientists - give exceedingly short shrift to out and out bullshit. And the ignorant fools that push it.


Another lie.

Are you a bot, because the only words in vocabulary seem to be your wrong.

Again i ask for evidence if i am so wrong you have no problem providing the evidence that obviously will contradict the laws of Physics, you are saying white light is a mixture of frequencies, a prism is not evidence of this.

Also I ask you if there was mixture of frequencies, then why do i see constant spectral colours in my living room? if the surfaces had an incident ray of a mixture of frequencies constantly reflecting of the matter, then all matter would be white according to you , and this is not what I observe on planet earth.


I ask for evidence, I give white light is a constant of invisible to sight , an axiom . You have nothing.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Are you a bot, because the only words in vocabulary seem to be your wrong.

Apart from all the other words you mean...

Again i ask for evidence if i am so wrong you have no problem providing the evidence

You've been given the evidence.
There was a rather good video in an earlier post.

that obviously will contradict the laws of Physics

Since you don't know physics - at even a basic level - that's rather a sweeping claim on your part.

you are saying white light is a mixture of frequencies, a prism is not evidence of this.

It is to anyone rational.

Also I ask you if there was mixture of frequencies, then why do i see constant spectral colours in my living room?

Huh?

if the surfaces had an incident ray of a mixture of frequencies constantly reflecting of the matter, then all matter would be white according to you

Wrong again.
Yet more evidence that you don't know what you're talking about.
(Then again, since this is basic Wikipedia stuff - you know, the stuff you claim to already know - you should know that "according to me" all matter would NOT be white).

I ask for evidence

And ignore or dismiss it when it's given.

I give white light is a constant of invisible to sight , an axiom .

Not only is not an axiom it's also meaningless word salad.

 

[paddoboy]

Are you a bot, because the only words in vocabulary seem to be your wrong.

Take it easy ol Son, getting overly excited may cause a coronary.
Take an aspro and have a good lay down.

I ask for evidence, I give white light is a constant of invisible to sight , an axiom . You have nothing.

You have your evidence but it's not what you like to hear, considering it shows just how delusionary you are.

So keep ignoring facts and supplied evidence, and remaining ignorant, it's no skin off anyone's nose except your own. Those are the only facts that exist with regards to your fairy tale.
Take it easy!

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Apart from all the other words you mean...


You've been given the evidence.
There was a rather good video in an earlier post.


Since you don't know physics - at even a basic level - that's rather a sweeping claim on your part.


It is to anyone rational.


Huh?


Wrong again.
Yet more evidence that you don't know what you're talking about.
(Then again, since this is basic Wikipedia stuff - you know, the stuff you claim to already know - you should know that "according to me" all matter would NOT be white).


And ignore or dismiss it when it's given.


Not only is not an axiom it's also meaningless word salad.

I watched the video from earlier and commented, in no way doe sthat video show white light in 3 dimensional space to be of mixed frequencies,the video shows that a prism has the ability to split white light into several frequencies and the ability to put several frequencies back to white light, but nowhere in the video does it show that light in 3 dimensional space is a mixture, you lie that is not evidence in any sense, that just shows a prisms effect no more no less, but certainly nothing to do with white light being a mixture of frequencies. I ask again for evidence you have not provided?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Take it easy ol Son, getting overly excited may cause a coronary.
Take an aspro and have a good lay down.



You have your evidence but it's not what you like to hear, considering it shows just how delusionary you are.

So keep ignoring facts and supplied evidence, and remaining ignorant, it's no skin off anyone's nose except your own. Those are the only facts that exist with regards to your fairy tale.
Take it easy!

What facts you have none for me.