E=mc2 questions?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seattle said:
TC, what country are you from, what is your native (original language) and what level of formal education did you attain?

What is it that would be obvious to us if we were to meet you in person? What kinds of comments did your teachers make concerning you when you were in their class?
Click to expand...
I left school early to be a mechanic although this is not the career I persisted in. Up until I had left school, I was in all the top sets, I was the ideal pupil with good marks etc.
I am English , I have had several careers including electrical wholesale of like plugs and wiring, I have worked has a silk screen printer, using 4 colour process and colour mixing etc, I am a qualified decorator, I have a NVQ level 2 in I.T although I am further advanced than that level, such has been able to make a web page using HTML coding, <self taught>, CGI software self taught, I am far from what some of you think.

Science wise about 3 year forum time,

Health and safety , COSHH etc.
 
Note he has yet to comment on Seattle's excellent video.

As I said, rancid stupidity should be pitied not derided.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
Dark is a constant
Click to expand...
No it's not.

space is a constant
Click to expand...
What?

light in dark space is a constant
Click to expand...
Contradicted by your first claim.


believe me when I say it is you who does not understand, I really understood Einstein, I got what he was saying big time.
Click to expand...
Wrong, did you f*ck, did you f*ck.

Simple questions:
1) Define "dark".
2) Define "light".

Science wise about 3 year forum time,
Click to expand...
In other words: no science. Because A) you demonstrably haven't posted any science and B) you demonstrably ignore any science that is told you.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
I left school early to be a mechanic although this is not the career I persisted in. Up until I had left school, I was in all the top sets, I was the ideal pupil with good marks etc.
I am English , I have had several careers including electrical wholesale of like plugs and wiring, I have worked has a silk screen printer, using 4 colour process and colour mixing etc, I am a qualified decorator, I have a NVQ level 2 in I.T although I am further advanced than that level, such has been able to make a web page using HTML coding, <self taught>, CGI software self taught, I am far from what some of you think.

Science wise about 3 year forum time,

Health and safety , COSHH etc.
Click to expand...
Do you have any learning disabilities such as dyslexia? In other words do you have greater difficulty with reading than others might?

Is that why you try to figure things out rather than just quickly reading a book or article?

You understand that lasers are single wave lengths such as 555 nanometer for a green laser. There are no white lasers since there is no single wave length that corresponds to "white".
 
billvon said:
Well, you may call it magic, we call it "physics."

Higher frequency photons have higher energies. If you add the light from a green, blue and red LED you get a relatively white light, since you now have a mix of frequencies. Indeed, that's how RGB LED's (and how the pixels you are looking at right now) work.
Click to expand...
I call it Physics to, and if your answer was correct that would mean that the light before it enters a Prism lines up relative to output, and my logic tells me that this is Physically impossible because there is simply no mechanism to make the mixture conform to line up.
My logic also tells me that if ''white light'' was a mixture of frequencies that then there would be no way a carrier signal could be received through the mixture.
 
Seattle said:
Do you have any learning disabilities such as dyslexia? In other words do you have greater difficulty with reading than others might?

Is that why you try to figure things out rather than just quickly reading a book or article?
Click to expand...
We had this conversation earlier on this thread, I already know what science is saying, I am arguing it is wrong, I have not come on this forum to be a sheep and apart of a flock by forced discipline telling me I have got to believe it, I have enough Joseph witnesses at the door as it is.
You have no evidence and I insist on evidence, so until you can actually prove that white light in 3 dimensional space is white and a mixture of frequencies, I will continue to argue because my logical and rational thinking is greater than your none existence evidence. A prism proves that it can split light into frequencies, it does not prove that ''white light '' is a mixture of frequencies.
 
Seattle said:
Do you have any learning disabilities such as dyslexia? In other words do you have greater difficulty with reading than others might?

Is that why you try to figure things out rather than just quickly reading a book or article?
Click to expand...


Being subject to his obvious crazy posts in a few threads now, I'm pretty sure, in line with your second point, that he chooses to fanatically promote the otherwise desirable quality of thinking for himself, and has posted that he intends to ignore all references and the knowledge gained over many years in the science disciplines.
The content and tone of his posts here are also reflecting this overwhelming, obstinate and stubborn opposition he has to anything logical, sensible and mainstream.
I said it earlier, a lost cause?
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
I know every argument you can give in defence
Click to expand...
No you don't because you don't know science.

I have already cross examined the evidence
Click to expand...
Only if "cross examine" means dismiss completely because of biased ignorance.

and i know you are wrong because your only evidence is so weak.
Click to expand...
No, you don't know I'm wrong, you believe [1] I am. Because you don't have a clue.

1 And this belief is as misdirected and wrong as any fundamentalist god botherer's.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
We had this conversation earlier on this thread, I already know what science is saying, I am arguing it is wrong, I have not come on this forum to be a sheep and apart of a flock by forced discipline telling me I have got to believe it, I have enough Joseph witnesses at the door as it is.
You have no evidence and I insist on evidence, so until you can actually prove that white light in 3 dimensional space is white and a mixture of frequencies, I will continue to argue because my logical and rational thinking is greater than your none existence evidence. A prism proves that it can split light into frequencies, it does not prove that ''white light '' is a mixture of frequencies.
Click to expand...
White light comes in, is split though diffraction into its components and then goes back though a prism to be recombined as white light again...what more do you want?

Why is your writing and grammar not good if you are English and have no learning disabilities? Joseph Witnesses aren't at your door.

You say that you "know" science but simply disagree however you show with every post that you do not know "science". You haven't read any books on the subjects that you post about have you?

Why is that? Do you find it difficult to read books?
 
paddoboy said:
Being subject to his obvious crazy posts in a few threads now, I'm pretty sure, in line with your second point, that he chooses to fanatically promote the otherwise desirable quality of thinking for himself, and has posted that he intends to ignore all references and the knowledge gained over many years in the science disciplines.
The content and tone of his posts here are also reflecting this overwhelming, obstinate and stubborn opposition he has to anything logical, sensible and mainstream.
I said it earlier, a lost cause?
Click to expand...
Trolling again trying to discuss me instead of content. Like you have stated before you do not know all Physics, you are not a scholar etc.

You do not provide logic, your evidence is not logically thought of proper, science fails me, i do not fail science, it is science that i deem to be a big let down, everything is only half looked at and not looked at in great depth.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
I call it Physics to
Click to expand...
And yet you disagree with it and substitute your own unsupported ideas.
and if your answer was correct that would mean that the light before it enters a Prism lines up relative to output, and my logic tells me that this is Physically impossible because there is simply no mechanism to make the mixture conform to line up.
Click to expand...
A slit or a simple hole would make the light "line up." Try it. Poke a small hole in a paper plate and take it outside. See if the shadow from the plate now has a tiny spot of light in it, caused by the light "lining up."
My logic also tells me that if ''white light'' was a mixture of frequencies that then there would be no way a carrier signal could be received through the mixture.
Click to expand...
And yet white light can be used to transmit both a communications carrier signal and information. Here's a patent on that very idea:
http://www.google.com/patents/US5657145

When your logic disagrees with reality, reality always wins. Reality is what keeps on happening no matter what you believe.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
I am on a forum, I am hardly writing for a literacy award.
Click to expand...
Neither am I.
But I can - at the very least - make clear statements, avoid spelling mistakes grammatical errors and abysmal syntax.
If you were capable of writing in correct English you'd do it. You have shown, consistently, that you're not capable of so doing.
 
Dywyddyr said:
No you don't because you don't know science.


Only if "cross examine" means dismiss completely because of biased ignorance.


No, you don't know I'm wrong, you believe [1] I am. Because you don't have a clue.

1 And this belief is as misdirected and wrong as any fundamentalist god botherer's.
Click to expand...
You are correct I do not know science, but not in the way you think i don't know science, in a way that I expected more professional attitudes instead of that of fools.
You give science a great name .
I am not bothered in the slightest what you say or try to say because it is very little, so i just often skip most of your post because it is just blah blah, you will not get a reaction of vulgar from me, you are not smart enough and could never push my buttons, you are irrelevant , dust in the world passing me by.
You must hate that you want to just bicker and i will not bite, poor you .
you have no evidence so stop lying.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
I know every argument you can give in defence, I have already cross examined the evidence and i know you are wrong because your only evidence is so weak.
Click to expand...


No, with the greatest respect this is totally delusional, and probably also reflects a fanaticism bordering on illness.
The sad part of course is that you will continue to believe and say what you will, even though evidence convincingly says you are wrong, and that stubborness will more then likely [from the evidence so far here] be taken to the grave with you.
Yet in the meantime the world and science moves on, dispelling your nonsensical non science scenarios. So in essence when your time comes, you will go still being a totally delusional human being, making no difference to the world and science in general.
An analogy is a young child reliving a fairy tale, and dressing up for the part. He/She at times is so immersed in their fantasy, that they will refuse to take their dress-up costumes off. In time though, they will grow up, and realise that Santa, the Easter bunny and the good Princess, was just fun times while they were immature.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top