E=mc2 questions?

[theorist-constant12345]

More evidence that you don't have the first f*cking clue as to what you're talking about.
The light is white in space: it splits into the different colours AFTER it has entered the prism.
Therefore the experiment illustrates PERFECTLY exactly what you asked for.

And, just so we're clear, THIS was the (most) incoherent drivel part: "...single frequency equal to sight".

The light is white in 3 dimensional space that is very odd because white is colour and i can not see through white very well at all, my observations observe clear light, there is no colour .

You have no evidence that light is a mixture of frequencies in 3 dimensional space, this is made up with no evidence.

 

[paddoboy]

A glass prism is not light in 3 dimensional space, the light in a prism becomes visible by manipulation of the mass of the prism , try again i ask for evidence?

Wow!!!!! Nuts, nuts, nuts, Brazil nuts, Hazel nuts, Walnuts, nuts, nuts, nuts!!

 

[theorist-constant12345]

According to you a prism has magic properties and the ability to line up the colours from any position, you will find that it is permeable by angle allowing the different propagation of one frequency to give the several frequencies. no different than adding different energies to a L.E.D , and this is not a mixture of frequencies but rather a mixture of energies.

 

[Dywyddyr]

The light is white in 3 dimensional space that is very odd because white is colour and i can not see through white very well at all, my observations observe clear light, there is no colour .

Meaningless crap.
1) White is NOT a colour.
2) Saying you can't see through white is like saying you can't smell through middle C. "White" is not a thing.

You have no evidence that light is a mixture of frequencies in 3 dimensional space, this is made up with no evidence.

You've just been given the evidence so stop lying.

 

[Seattle]

Produce a white laser if you can then...

 

[Dywyddyr]

According to you a prism has magic properties and the ability to line up the colours from any position, you will find that it is permeable by angle allowing the different propagation of one frequency to give the several frequencies. no different than adding different energies to a L.E.D , and this is not a mixture of frequencies but rather a mixture of energies.

Meaningless incoherent crap.
You're simply throwing words that YOU think are "scientific" in the hopes of sounding knowledgeable.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Meaningless crap.
1) White is NOT a colour.
2) Saying you can't see through white is like saying you can't smell through middle C. "White" is not a thing.


You've just been given the evidence so stop lying.

You have not provided evidence, i asked for evidence in 3 dimensional space that light was a mixture of frequencies, you said a prism which is not 3 dimensional space and an interaction of light.

You have no evidence I already know this so you stop lying.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Meaningless incoherent crap.
You're simply throwing words that YOU think are "scientific" in the hopes of sounding knowledgeable.

I can make an L.E.D , I know how they work it is not random words at all.

 

[Dywyddyr]

You have not provided evidence, i asked for evidence in 3 dimensional space that light was a mixture of frequencies,

You've been given the evidence.
The light is in "3 dimensional space" [1] BEFORE it enters the prism.
The prism then splits that light into the separate colours showing that the light consists of multiple colours.

you said a prism which is not 3 dimensional space and an interaction of light.

No I didn't.
Stop lying about what I've said.

You have no evidence I already know this so you stop lying.

Another lie on your part.

1 Why do you persist in using terms like "3 dimensional space"? All it does make you look like the know-nothing beginner you really are.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

You've been given the evidence.
The light is in "3 dimensional space" [1] BEFORE it enters the prism.
The prism then splits that light into the separate colours showing that the light consists of multiple colours.


No I didn't.
Stop lying about what I've said.


Another lie on your part.

1 Why do you persist in using terms like "3 dimensional space"? All it does make you look like the know-nothing beginner you really are.

So you are insisting that a prism is in some way magic and has the mechanism to tell the different frequencies before they enter the prism to stand in line in their separate wavelengths, you are talking garbage, there is no mechanism in a prism except angle, this can be shown using a cube, and there is then no separation.
I ask again for evidence that the prism is not just simply modulating a single frequency constant of 3 dimensional space, the single frequency we all observe with sight that is equal to sight?

 

[Dywyddyr]

So you are insisting that a prism is in some way magic

Oh look, you're making shit up again.
I haven't said that.

you are talking garbage, there is no mechanism in a prism except angle, this can be shown using a cube, and there is then no separation.

For someone who claims to know science this is especially dumb on your part.
All you're doing here is showing that you know f*ck all about refraction.

I ask again for evidence that the prism is not just simply modulating a single frequency of 3 dimensional space, the single frequency we all observe with sight that is equal to sight?

And now we're back to the meaningless word salad again...

 

[Seattle]

TC, indulge me here for a moment. I know that you can Google "prism" or go to YouTube. Why haven't you done this? If you have, why do you make the comments that you do?

Check this short video out...

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Oh look, you're making shit up again.
I haven't said that.


For someone who claims to know science this is especially dumb on your part.
All you're doing here is showing that you know f*ck all about refraction.


And now we're back to the meaningless word salad again...

Now we are back to avoiding the answers because you know very well that in 3 dimensional space that light is see through and not white and you know very well the evidence i am asking you for is none existent.
You can not prove ''white light'' is a mixture of frequencies, where as I have and can give a very good argument against. Firstly we observe a singular constant frequency that travels at a constant speed.
Secondly if Em radiation was the mix of ever changing frequencies , carrier signals would fail to work, the energy of the signal would be washed into the mix by the mix.
All communication is within the constant and different to the constant, and that is the only reason it works.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

TC, indulge me here for a moment. I know that you can Google "prism" or go to YouTube. Why haven't you done this? If you have, why do you make the comments that you do?

Check this short video out...

And this shows a prism interacting with light and emitting at different frequencies to the input, this does not show a mixture of frequencies in 3 dimensional space, if that were the case then the frequencies would not line up to enter the prism in order, that is impossible.

The spectrum is diluted light, hence different energies, the spectrum is man made and does not exist in 3 dimensional space.

 

[billvon]

I ask for proof that white light is a mixture of frequencies in 3 dimensional space

Sure! From your own post:
"White light is a mixture of the spectral frequencies."
So as long as you believe yourself, you have your proof.

I observe a single frequency equal to sight that is see through and in no means white .

Right. There are single frequency (color) lights out there, like lasers and gas discharge tubes. Great observation.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Now we are back to avoiding the answers

Another lie.
I haven't "avoided" anything.

because you know very well that in 3 dimensional space that light is see through and not white and you know very well the evidence i am asking you for is none existent.

Wrong.

You can not prove ''white light'' is a mixture of frequencies

Wrong.

where as I have and can give a very good argument against.

No you haven't.
Ignorance is not an argument, let alone a good one.

Firstly we observe a singular constant frequency that travels at a constant speed.

No.

Secondly if Em radiation was the mix of ever changing frequencies , carrier signals would fail to work, the energy of the signal would be washed into the mix by the mix.

No.

All communication is within the constant and different to the constant, and that is the only reason it works.

Word salad again.

 

[billvon]

According to you a prism has magic properties and the ability to line up the colours from any position

Well, you may call it magic, we call it "physics."

no different than adding different energies to a L.E.D , and this is not a mixture of frequencies but rather a mixture of energies.

Higher frequency photons have higher energies. If you add the light from a green, blue and red LED you get a relatively white light, since you now have a mix of frequencies. Indeed, that's how RGB LED's (and how the pixels you are looking at right now) work.

 

[paddoboy]

deleted because rancid stupidity should be pitied not derided.

 

[Seattle]

TC, what country are you from, what is your native (original language) and what level of formal education did you attain?

What is it that would be obvious to us if we were to meet you in person? What kinds of comments did your teachers make concerning you when you were in their class?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Sure! From your own post:
"White light is a mixture of the spectral frequencies."
So as long as you believe yourself, you have your proof.

Right. There are single frequency (color) lights out there, like lasers and gas discharge tubes. Great observation.

Einstein's constant speed of light gives the effect of a constant to sight of see through, the light makes the dark see through to all observers.
The space between your eyes and the monitor is see through, this is a constant and not a mixture of frequencies.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Einstein's constant speed of light gives the effect of a constant to sight of see through

Meaningless crap.

the light makes the dark see through to all observers.

No.

The space between your eyes and the monitor is see through, this is a constant and not a mixture of frequencies.

What?
Space is a "constant"?