The eliptic orbit of the Earth around the Sun is an effect made by gravity, the earth wants to travel in a linearity but the gravity keeps the earth centripetally locked at its relative distance to the force.
E=mc2 questions?
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Would you like me to add newtons laws and mass in motion will remain in motion and the original KE came from the big bang etc?
What people do not consider when considering gravity is that an object on the ground is still falling, it only has 0 velocity because the ground is obstructing it, but we know the force is still there that we call weight, the force being imposed on the mass of an object.
Also people do not consider that the ground is also falling with the exact same force, the Fn=0 is never zero, the Fn is the weight of an object.
An object imposes a force on the ground, the ground does not impose a force on the object, the ground imposes a force on the center of mass centripetally.
That is why I broke down Newton's Law's for the reason of the third Law fails when considering the facts.
Also people do not consider that the ground is also falling with the exact same force, the Fn=0 is never zero, the Fn is the weight of an object.
An object imposes a force on the ground, the ground does not impose a force on the object, the ground imposes a force on the center of mass centripetally.
That is why I broke down Newton's Law's for the reason of the third Law fails when considering the facts.
Last edited:
OK, I'll give you that. Wow, that makes it so odd that so much of what you say is nonsense. Ok, so 1-1 tie. Let's go again:
The speed of light is 186,000 miles per second and is constant for all inertial observers.
Your turn.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Farsight (Duffield) is a pretty serious autodidact, though he has in consequence some highly bizarre notions. And he can write English - he's actually had a book published, even though hardly anybody reads it. It's unfair to compare them, except that both exhibit a self-confidence that runs, shall we say, a little ahead of their competence.
The speed of light often referred to as c, is a constant speed in a Vacuum to all observers, the speed of light can slow down in a medium. Light is apart of the Electromagnetic radiation created by black bodies.
White light is a mixture of the spectral frequencies, it travels in a wave but also as the behaviour of a particle, we call this wave-particle duality.
The spectral range consists of several wavelengths , red being the weaker of the range and Ultra violet being on the higher energy level range.
Would you like me to go into the propagation of waves, red being more of a linearity than UV , UV being a much tighter propagation...
I still deny it, I am showing you i know your anwsers and present information, that is why I am arguing it because I do know your science and I deem some of it to be not quite logically accurate.
I am not copying anything I wrote those words, that is my answer if I was in an exam, i could not give my own answer they would think i was insane.
Light is an illusion would be my answer
the person with the best memory always gets the best results in exams, some smart people just have bad memory.
What the eck you got going through your head now, I am playing along with sentencing game, answering the questions as if I was in an exam, so the answers i have to give are the answers that you think you know that were passed down from history, it is memory process, In an exam i could not answer , what is light , and put its an illusion, I have to put the same as everyone else and follow the programming on someones say say from history.
I told you I know your science.
Your turn- The human race thinks that measuring an energy difference in two caesium atoms is in some way relative to time.
My apologies Russ - it was not my intent to make it seem as though a theory was somehow "wrong" - rather, a theory is something that can (and does) evolve as our understanding of a subject, as well as our technological ability to observe, test, and otherwise collect data about said subject, continues to advance. In effect, what we "know" today could very well be shown to be wrong using tomorrows technology and knowledge; a theory is the best representation of understanding of a subject that we have today, knowing that there is still plenty about the universe at large that we do not know.
Also, to be fair - I am NOT a Physics and Math moderator - I know enough to know that I do not know enough to effectively moderate the Physic and Math subforums - I am a hobbyist physics fan at best, not a well-versed scholar. If my understanding/explanation is lacking or incorrect please, by all means, correct it.
Ok, the rules are to say one scientific thing. I'll give you that because it was pretty much correct, but only one point. So its 2-2. My turn:
Humans did not evolve from apes, but rather both evolved from the same common ancestor. (I didn't say this just had to be physics. Note: your statement does not have to be about the same subject.)
Your turn.
A solidified amount of electrolytes will have a greater entropy of Thermodynamics than in their solute form.
- Status