E=mc2 questions?
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Notice how this member is avoiding the simple question I have just asked then returns to the insulting members , now he says I suffer from being old.
Answer the questions or stay out of the post, the real people may want to talk and answer the questions i put forward.
<A+B>+<x+y>=C
meaningless nonsense, I suggest you go look up forces and how they work, then you may have the ability to comment about what i am writing that is standard Physics.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Yes I think he's mostly likely ill, too. Or a very ingenious troll, possibly.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Quod Erat Demonstrandum.
Do you not realise that has plain as day you are the ones trolling and not even discussing the thread ?
Gravity is a subject that is incomplete, unlike you whom can not think past what you are programmed with I can think, what I am saying is simply the truth about forces and any half minded scientist knows this. You are still a group of trolls and still trolling, you have no use to this forum, you do not contribute with your words, you want to get rid of me because you fear me.
My paper abstract is a big threat to science , a paper I can with logical axioms prove to be true, and your science is a make believe fallacy living inside a box, either put up or shut up, I challenge your force knowledge and everyone else's force knowledge.
Gravity subject , you are saying I am deluded for talking about gravity when you can not answer what it is exactly which was already admitted in this thread. It is not I whom is delusion.
it would be not hard to show the logic involved and prove it with axioms, for your information weight is not even a thing , it does not exist, it is a product of force.
Mass is also the product of force. density is the product of force,
added-motion is a product of force.
Two things exist in the Universe, - and +
added-motion is a product of force.
Two things exist in the Universe, - and +
Blah, blah blah. Babble.
Compare him to, say, Farsight. Some of their properties are similar, but Farsight actually says a lot of correct things. More than half, by my estimation, depending on the context. But for TC, every-single-post is gibberish. I find it hard to believe that someone could have so many loose screws and still be able to post here as if they live an otherwise normal life (unless mental hospitals have computers for their residents?). That's why I lean toward troll.
Nice try troll, you picked up on the post about old age, and are now trying to push for the mental illness lines, quite hilarious troll, avoid the questions again and post another post of no use to this thread or a science forum.
Compare me to nothing, this is not a forum to discuss and make presumptions in another individuals life, you are rude and are one of the reasons that people will avoid science forums and discussion.
If I was of a petty nature I would go see a solicitor and sue for slander, the insults are remarkable presumption and untrue and unfounded.
This is a forum, grow up and answer the questions, talk about the topic or stay out like the mods have warned you all which you seem to take no notice of disrespecting the mods in my opinion, persisting on trying to tell them there jobs.
Ignorance is simply a state of unknowing, nothing more. Science has no "answers" to gravity, only theories - there is a reason for this. There is a very rigorous process by which a scientific theory must be tested, repeatedly, before it becomes accepted as simple fact. Again, there is a very good reason for this - it's because we are constantly learning new things about how the universe around us works.
Simply postulating outrageous proposals on how something works isn't going to get science anywhere. There is a method to be followed, because that method works - it leads to well tested, well understood, and well proven answers, as opposed to "hopeful desires"
You misread: I'm not pushing for mental illness, I'm pushing for trolling. I argued against mental illness.
How about a test/game? I'd like to see if you are willing/able to say anything correct. So please: post a one or two sentence statement of a scientific principle - any principle. But in your own words - don't just copy/paste something from wikipedia. I'll go first:
Earth rotates about its axis and revolves around the sun.
Your turn.
I understand that, that is why I always say I am just asking about something, I know I do my arrogant bit, but that is when other members seemingly go off topic.
My ideas are not just made up, like I have said it is fundamental Physics all based on your present science.
If electrons are attracted protons and vice versus by electrostatic force, then other Protons and electrons should also be attracted to other atoms by the same force, the force does not cease, so to deny that proton A will not attract the electron of proton B, I find this would be insane when the force Laws clearly state this will happen?
Earth is under centripetal acceleration in the above process mentioned.
That statement reflects a disturbing lack of understanding of science for a scientific forum moderator. The word "answer" is poorly defined and not used in science (perhaps substitute "fact" or "truth" or "Truth"), but to describe an idea as a theory is the highest compliment that can be paid to any idea. Saying "only theory" implies there is something wrong with an idea being a theory or that there is something better.
Not specific enough:I mentioned two processes and you need to describe the centripetal acceleration better. Close, though. For that, I'd give you half credit if you can't do better.
Wow, I understood the answer.
- Status