It is a good idea to understand what something is before you use it to try to "prove" a theory. "Here's something I saw on Youtube that I do not understand" really doesn't lend much support for your theories.
E=mc2 questions?
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
OMG, that is hilarious!!! "Theorists Law"? You aren't really that arrogantly ignorant, are you? Please tell me that this is just a game to see how long you can go without ever saying anything that is correct. Please?
If you actually read it and consider it you will realise that what i said about newton laws is actually possibly true, the ground does not push back, it is Physically impossible unless there is an Earthquake.
I read it. Just like everything - and I do mean everything - else you post, it is complete nonsense. Again, on Day 1 of physics in middle school, kids learn Newton's laws. It is tough to fathom how you can understand them so badly.
Yes, it does. Google "normal force."
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
The restoring force of something elastic is proportional to the amount by which it has been stretched. So the closer it gets back to the unstretched condition the less the force is. Gravity is the opposite. As the objects get closer the force becomes stronger (inverse square law). So it is clear that whatever gravity is, there is nothing elastic about it.
Face it T-C, every time you say something, you reveal more areas of your own ignorance. If you are prepared to be taught, some of us will gladly teach you. But you cannot just make shit up and pretend you are doing science.
Or , rather, you can of course, nothing physically stops you, but then everybody will take you for a tiresome idiot. And I'm afraid they will be right.
Yes he is that arrogant...check out his other threads...couple that with delusional, grossly over inflated ego, and we have the recipe for something truly undesirable.
No it's not. Gravity is not electrostatic. Gravity is something else entirely.
No, this was a statement you made. The atom is crushed to degenerate matter immediately upon hitting the surface of the Neutron star. It does not enter the Neutron star, NS is a solid body, in fact it is the most solid thing that exists.
It was headed there from the start and obviously from the first few dozen or so posts.
I predict his next post will be "OK, so gravity is the same as magnetism because they both attract things. It's an excellent theory I have that people here are not smart enough to understand."
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Kittamaru, thank you very much.
I think we've all had a vivid demonstration, at great length, of the breathtaking scope of ignorance of T-C and of his stubborn resistance to, or innate incapacity for, taking in the simplest scientific explanation (mass v. weight).
Maybe this can be taken into account in future decisions regarding threads he starts in the hard science sections.
Last edited:
A small amount of electrostatic becomes a large amount of electrostatic when density is brought into it. You are incorrect in saying gravity is not electrostatic , because science does not know what it is. The obvious logic when involving two house bricks in space and they both attract each other, the only mechanism inside those bricks that has the means to attract is the atomic forces within. A house brick is atoms, there is nothing else in the house brick with any mechanism.
P.s and not once do i say it is electrostatic, I say it is an energy within mass, possibly atomic based.
I will ask you one question, you say I am ignorant yet science has no answers to gravity, so how does that make me ignorant when you have no answers to learn because the answers are not there for anyone to learn?
Ignorant to what exactly when there is nothing to be ignorant of?
A Proton has an attractive force of x, an electron has an attractive force of Y, an atom has the attractive force of both x and y, do you disagree with that?
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
That's not what makes you ignorant. What makes you ignorant is (and this is a far from exhaustive list):
- not knowing the difference between weight and mass, which any 11 yr old learns at school,
- not knowing that gravity has nothing to do with the heat energy in water,
- thinking that what alters the weight of a body is its speed,
- not knowing that elasticity and gravitation are quite different in behaviour,
and, most particularly, your refusal or incapacity to take in any explanation on any of such topics. That is true and profound ignorance. It means that, not only do you know no science at all, but you are too ignorant even to understand how to think in a scientific way. You are also so ignorant of science that you think you can just talk at random out of your arse and call it a scientific theory.
The most depressing aspect, by far, is that you are either too dim or too mad to realise any of this.
A proton has a repelling force of A, an electron has a repelling force of B, an atom has a repelling force of both A and B,
An atom has an equal force of C, an equilibrium of repel and attract by A,B,X and Y, If A,B,X and y is not at an equal then the effects are either stronger bonds or repelling as with Helium and Hydrogen.
An atom has an equal force of C, an equilibrium of repel and attract by A,B,X and Y, If A,B,X and y is not at an equal then the effects are either stronger bonds or repelling as with Helium and Hydrogen.
Wrong I know the difference but have argued they are the same thing technically , to find a mass you weight the object, if not where else do you get kg from etc?
The rest of the world understand Kg to be weight, Newtons can not be the weight because newtons change by altitude, and weight does not.
Newtons is a force , and the pressure of force over altitude, I am not ignorant I just disagree, there is a big difference in that than being ignorant.
- Status