And look at these below ones, Foot Prints have been rearranged, the same foot print is not in the both pics
Did We Really Go To The Moon
- Thread starter ditm
- Start date
And look at these below ones, Foot Prints have been rearranged, the same foot print is not in the both pics
I thought you were hot for [ENC]Mars[/ENC]? Which by the way, generally considered more red than orange.
Pictures in the clouds
They obviously took a second "salute" pic, after a short spot of walking around (the pictures were taken at different times). And maybe he left his camera somewhere, perhaps it was hard to plant the flag/place instruments with a bulky camera on his chest.And look at these below ones, Foot Prints have been rearranged, the same foot print is not in the both pics
I agree with u on this one, the angle is quite different too. the picture. The picture on the left is taken after the picture on the right side.
So this proof is not proofy at all. but The camera mystery remains.
It would have if if there had been no overwhelming evidence to support that NASA FAKED MOON LANDINGs.
So, again, why isn't it in the Pseudoscience section?It would have if if there had been no overwhelming evidence to support that NASA FAKED MOON LANDINGs.
Last edited:
Just read the last 4 or 5 lines. The camera point is stunning.
Excellent website, just save the photos before its knocked out off web. http://www.geocities.com/apolloreality/
Picture far right above is a time lapse sequence taken at night. Notice spotlights on crane gantry, and how it illuminates the ground surface.
The mock LM was traversed full length of crane, and simultaneously lowered at the same time in order to create an authentic looking lunar landing, when viewed from within the mock LM itself. Power supply to the mock LM was by cable from crane tower. This enabled a large fan, (fitted beneath the mock LM), to create the dust scatter effect of a rocket engine as it descended to the fake Moon surface. The film shown to public of the LM supposedly blasting off from the Moon's surface was also created beneath this crane at LRC. The mock LM was simply attached to the crane, and hoisted very rapidly at the same time a pathetic looking blast off sparks was enacted beneath it. The film was then speeded up for showing to the public, and it is interesting to note that the camera filming this sequence cut short once the LM had reached the crane maximum height. In other words WHY didn't the camera continue to film the LM until it was out of view? Quite simply because it was not possible to do under the circumstances in which the "lift off" was faked.
Excellent website, just save the photos before its knocked out off web. http://www.geocities.com/apolloreality/
Picture far right above is a time lapse sequence taken at night. Notice spotlights on crane gantry, and how it illuminates the ground surface.
The mock LM was traversed full length of crane, and simultaneously lowered at the same time in order to create an authentic looking lunar landing, when viewed from within the mock LM itself. Power supply to the mock LM was by cable from crane tower. This enabled a large fan, (fitted beneath the mock LM), to create the dust scatter effect of a rocket engine as it descended to the fake Moon surface. The film shown to public of the LM supposedly blasting off from the Moon's surface was also created beneath this crane at LRC. The mock LM was simply attached to the crane, and hoisted very rapidly at the same time a pathetic looking blast off sparks was enacted beneath it. The film was then speeded up for showing to the public, and it is interesting to note that the camera filming this sequence cut short once the LM had reached the crane maximum height. In other words WHY didn't the camera continue to film the LM until it was out of view? Quite simply because it was not possible to do under the circumstances in which the "lift off" was faked.
Excellent points in that website.
The leg of the astronaut is a clear pullup of a string. or seems like he was doing Judo in that thick suit
BTW if this thread is closed, then ....
U guessed it right.
The leg of the astronaut is a clear pullup of a string. or seems like he was doing Judo in that thick suit
BTW if this thread is closed, then ....
U guessed it right.
Did anytime your leg got flunged up above behind u in earths gravity whenever u had fell ?
May be it happens in low gravity.
Obviously they had got bored of the retakes without hearing the word "ACTION" through that thick uncomfortable suits. And who is going to ask or inquire; certainly not the government.
Anyways , they had no idea that hackers in the future would steal the photos from secured sites like they did about AbuGaribh prison photos.:bravo:
no doubt they got bored, their mission was to reach the moon and go back not to do any actual constructive workings (or not much).
I do believe that the suits got intern communication systems. Anyway in movies they would have had a creative director something NASA most obviosly didn't had.
I do believe that the suits got intern communication systems. Anyway in movies they would have had a creative director something NASA most obviosly didn't had.
See those arrows they clearly point out the alien who just passed by him. No wonder he looks in a shocked posture. :roflmao:
superstring01
Moderator
Yes... we went to the moon. The Russians and East Germans were listening to everything we were doing and would have lept upon any opportunity to destroy the US's credibility... but somehow didn't. All the moon-landing-doubters fail to ever talk to the people who they should, namely: the astronauts, foreign AMERICAN HATING agencies, and the general facts involved.
~String
~String
