mtf said:
The reason my words don't make sense to you is because you keep ascribing to me stances I don't hold. And a gender I am not.
No, the reason your words don't make sense is because they are meaningless, and therefore worthless.
You seem to think people don't see what you're doing. Who knows, maybe you really do think you're clever. Constantly changing the subject, cowardly evasion, and all you're asking of women is more than any human being can provide.
The answer to what she is supposed to do depends on who makes the assessment.
For instance, in the question of street harassment, we see repeated iterations that she must make it clear that she is not available. First, this is blatant objectification; her existential condition remains subordinate to his until she explicitly declares her independence―men would not accept this obligation unto themselves.
Secondly, despite the years and bodies piling up, these advocates just don't give a damn that what they demand of women gets them killed. This stubborn refusal to recognize the humanity and human rights of women presents a mortal danger in society. But, you know,
hey, why should men have to worry about that?
In the question of rape, the general message to women from society is that
she must plan each day around the prospect of being sexually assaulted↱. Consider the idea of
anti-roofie nail polish; here
I'll leave the point to the women, in this case one Rebecca Neagle↗:
"The problem isn't that women don't know when there are roofies in their drink; the problem is people putting roofies in their drink in the first place."
The thing that I don't get is whether you think you're original, or whether you're just making antisocial noise in order to be antisocial. The truth is that we've seen many like you before: Walk in, contribute nothing to a thread, pick out the woman in the room and launch all manner of predictable attack. This is an old, flaccid routine, generally impotent yet still unsanitary for pissing all over everything.
You're not original. You're just another two-bit troll who throws random shit around the room and isn't capable of properly advocating any of it. This flood of barren, stinking, shitborne fallacies is just another day in a world overstuffed with cheap, uneducated hatred yielding naught for harvest but self-absement.
You're asking two things of women:
(1) That they be capable of doing more than any human being.
(2) That they remain, while doing so, less than human.
Neither is this remotely surprising; the two generally go hand in hand.
Here's one "she" can consider: In history, a legal defense for murder known as "gay panic" failed. Think about it for a minute, though. A guy sees someone he fancies, drops a pickup line, gets beaten to death. The reason the gay panic line failed has to do with weird ideas like, "You told him you were gay, and invited him to come with you under that pretense, so how can you say you panicked when he said or did this?"
A rape panic defense is risky in a different way. Unlike gay panic, a real rape crisis exists, and the societal response is to tell women to cover their own interests as well as prevent men from attempting to pursue theirs. It is, functionally speaking, only a matter of time before a woman straps on and stands her ground and shoots a guy to death for dropping a cheap pickup line on her. The only way to acquit would be to presume that he has every absolute right to approach and proposition any woman he wants under any circumstances.
So let's make this as straightforward as possible:
•
Hope Racine↑ wrote, "I don't know when reading a book in public became a signal that we're desperate for attention and conversation", and that presents a valid question:
Just how does that work?
If
he presumes and thus assigns
her context, and
he defines
his own context, then what does it matter what
she thinks?
And therein lies the problem.
Thus: A woman reading a book
catches his fancy↑.
Why should he interrupt her? Why should he presume she wants to be interrupted? What is the signal about reading a book that says she wants to be chatted up and hit on?
Let's start with that.
Stop erasing women from the discussion; these are
their lives we're discussing, after all.