Dear Believers, prove your god or gods is/aren't just fiction(s).

If you are forced to use a word like faith in science....
Early humans didn’t need to put their faith in anything but a big stick. Now days, we still have these big sticks (science) for our faith.
And, a funny thing about this kind of faith, is that it changes along with the changing models.
You see anywhere a god needs to come into this?:)
Playing with the definition just makes you look disingenuous.
 
Playing with the definition just makes you look disingenuous.
I wasn’t playing...
This is Yazata, author of the "Big Lie."
I showed an example of being forced to use the word faith in science.
And ending with “You see anywhere a god needs to come into this?”

You later said the same thing “ No Sky dadday needed”.
If we are suppose to be adults here, then why your remark “Try adulting.” to Yazata?
 
50 And he led them out as far as to Bethany, and he lifted up his hands, and blessed them. 51 And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into heaven. 52 And they worshipped him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy: 53 And were continually in the temple, praising and blessing God. Amen.
Luke 24 ok. So the author (lets call him Luke) wrote this, not any of the witnesses right? When did Luke write this? 80-85 CE? So 50-55 years after the death of Jesus? What was life expectancy in first century Palestine? 40? 45? 55?
 
John, "Before Abraham was I am." So Jesus existed before Abraham?

Also don't forget get the logos. " In the beginning was the word and the word was god and the word was with god. "

Yes. Jesus was Michael, the archangel. Logos meaning spokesperson. The Hebrew/Greek word translated angel means messenger, so when applied to men it is rendered messenger, but when to spirit creatures, it is rendered angel. Jesus spoke on God's behalf. When angels appeared, for example, in the breezy part of the day to talk with Adam and Eve it was likely Jesus/Michael, or with Lot, etc. He was one of the us in Genesis 1:26; 3:22. He was prophetically, God's master worker in Isaiah 9:6. Also significant in regard to the holy spirit. The holy spirit isn't a person, Jehovah's active force, his means of getting things done. Metaphorically his "hands" or "fingers." Holy means belonging to and spirit means invisible active force producing visible results - wind, breath, energy. When something was done like creating life, the universe and everything, or raising from the dead, healing the blind - it was done through God's holy spirit. His dynamic energy.
 
I agree, it's highly dismissable. The family went for a census that never happened, was never scheduled to happen then. But it did put the fam in "the house of David". Unfortunately the heritage follows the male line, so Jesus wouldn't be of the House of David.

Where do you get your information?

I would make one more observation about Jesus's birth but it got me suspended on an atheist forum a few years ago.

Oh, please! I've been banned from them all on numerous occasions. I was probably there then.
 
Yes. Jesus was Michael, the archangel. Logos meaning spokesperson. The Hebrew/Greek word translated angel means messenger, so when applied to men it is rendered messenger, but when to spirit creatures, it is rendered angel. Jesus spoke on God's behalf. When angels appeared, for example, in the breezy part of the day to talk with Adam and Eve it was likely Jesus/Michael, or with Lot, etc. He was one of the us in Genesis 1:26; 3:22. He was prophetically, God's master worker in Isaiah 9:6. Also significant in regard to the holy spirit. The holy spirit isn't a person, Jehovah's active force, his means of getting things done. Metaphorically his "hands" or "fingers." Holy means belonging to and spirit means invisible active force producing visible results - wind, breath, energy. When something was done like creating life, the universe and everything, or raising from the dead, healing the blind - it was done through God's holy spirit. His dynamic energy.
I'm not sure which scholars think that. Certainly not in Genesis or Isaiah.
I know Christians reference Isaiah a lot but the are looking for Jesus to find some sort of prophecy.
Certainly the "born of a virgin" Matthew cited is a mistranslation as are the "servant" references cited by other sources and today.

"Servant" was simply Israel.
 
I'm not sure which scholars think that. Certainly not in Genesis or Isaiah.

I've posted a response to Jesus being Michael here.

I know Christians reference Isaiah a lot but the are looking for Jesus to find some sort of prophecy.

Christians! Might as well ask the cat.

Certainly the "born of a virgin" Matthew cited is a mistranslation as are the "servant" references cited by other sources and today.

"Servant" was simply Israel.

What? I don't pay a lot of attention to Christian doctrine unless, as I've probably stated repeatedly, it presents a conflict with the Biblical, but are you thinking maiden? And I don't see the connection you seem to be making. That may be due to my not being conversant in Jewish and Christian theology or that you (your sources) are wonky.
 
For some reason, which I could never quite understand, it seems extremely difficult for some people, especially skeptics, to understand that Jesus and Michael are the same. Lets look at the facts regarding Jesus and Michael.

1. Jesus existed in heaven before he came to earth. Proverbs 8:22 / John 1:1,3, 14; 3:13; 8:23, 58; 17:5 / Colossians 1:15-17 / 1 John 2:13 / Revelation 3:14 all speak of Jesus' existence before the world began, in fact before anything was created Jesus was created. Before Heaven, the heavens, the Earth, and of course, man. He is the firstborn of creation, the beginning of creation, he came from somewhere other than this world, he descended from heaven. There can be no doubt that he had a pre-human existence in heaven before he came to Earth as the man Jesus Christ.

2. Jesus' position in heaven before he came to the earth must have been an important one, considering he was the first of Jehovah's creation and all things were created through him and for him. (Proverbs 8:22 / John 1:3) That means not only the heavens and earth as we know them but the angels and heaven as well. Jesus is referred to as the "word of God," this means he is the spokesperson. (John 1:1) As the spokesperson for Jehovah God we can assume that when an angel performed some important task on earth, like guiding and protecting the early Israelites from Egypt or taking the physical form of men in performing an important task, it was likely Michael as he existed before he came to earth as Jesus.

3. The term archangel means chief of the angels. Arch means chief or principal. The term is only applied to one angel in the Bible. Michael. It is always used in the singular. There is only one archangel. The term archangel itself only appears twice throughout Scripture. At 1 Thessalonians 4:16 Paul writes of Jesus as having the voice of the archangel, and Jude 9 indicates Michael disputed with Satan over the body of Moses. So there is a connection with Jesus as well as an indication that Michael was connected in some way with the people of the exodus of Egypt.

4. Other than Jehovah God himself only two people in the Bible are said to be in charge of or over the angels. They are Michael and Jesus Christ. The name Michael appears only five times throughout Scripture. At Daniel 10:13, 21; 12:1 / Jude 9 and Revelation 12:7.

5. Are there any others who believe Michael and Jesus are the same? Yes, there are many. Joseph Benson, E. W. Hengstenberg, J. P. Lange, Butterworth, Cruden, Taylor, Guyse all wrote that Michael and Jesus were the same.

Clarke's Commentary (Adam Clarke) - "Let it be observed that the word archangel is never found in the plural number in the sacred writings. There can be properly only one archangel, one chief or head of all the angelic host .... Michael is this archangel, and head of all the angelic orders .... hence by this personage, in the Apocalypse, many understand the Lord Jesus."

W. E. Vine - the "voice of the archangel" (1 Thessalonians 4:16) is apparently "the voice of the Lord Jesus Christ" - An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, p. 64.

The 1599 Geneva Study Bible: Christ is the Prince of angels and head of the Church, who bears that iron rod."

The International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia: - "The earlier Protestant scholars usually identified Michael with the preincarnate Christ, finding support for their view, not only in the juxtaposition of the "child" and the archangel in Rev. 12, but also in the attributes ascribed to him in Daniel" – vol. 3, p. 2048, Eerdmans Publishing, 1984 printing.

John Calvin: "I embrace the opinion of those who refer this to the person of Christ, because it suits the subject best to represent him as standing forward for the defense of his elect people." - J. Calvin, Commentaries On The Book Of The Prophet Daniel, trans. T. Myers (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1979), vol. 2 p. 369.

Brown's Dictionary of the Bible - on 'Michael' and 'Angel,' both these words do sometimes refer to Christ; and also affirms that Christ is the Archangel.

The NIV Study Bible - "The Angel of the LORD .... Traditional Christian interpretation has held that this 'angel' was a preincarnate manifestation of Christ as God's Messenger-Servant. It may be ..., the angel could speak on behalf of the One who sent him." - footnote for Gen. 16:7. Zondervan Publishing, 1985

Smith's Bible Dictionary (says of Michael) - "Angel of the Lord. ... Christ's visible form before the incarnation. p. 40"

Today's Dictionary of the Bible - "Angel of the Lord [angel of Jehovah] - occurs many times in the Old Testament, where in almost every instance it means a supernatural personage to be distinguished from Jehovah .... Some feel the pre-incarnate Christ is meant." Bethany House Publ., 1982, p. 39.



Christians! Might as well ask the cat.



What? I don't pay a lot of attention to Christian doctrine unless, as I've probably stated repeatedly, it presents a conflict with the Biblical, but are you thinking maiden? And I don't see the connection you seem to be making. That may be due to my not being conversant in Jewish and Christian theology or that you (your sources) are wonky.
Yes I know there are a lot of claims but I noticed you did not reference the synoptics.
What did Mark say? The first Gospel? Closest to the events but still 40 years distant?
 
Yes I know there are a lot of claims but I noticed you did not reference the synoptics.

I don't even know what that means. Had to look it up. Silly terms. Matthew was the first, we've discussed that. I did mention John.

What did Mark say?

Nothing about being the first Gospel, nothing contradictory to what I'm saying.

The first Gospel? Closest to the events but still 40 years distant?

Evidence?
 
I don't even know what that means. Had to look it up. Silly terms. Matthew was the first, we've discussed that. I did mention John.



Nothing about being the first Gospel, nothing contradictory to what I'm saying.



Evidence?
You want me to explain Biblical scholarship to you? That is a very long thread. It would be easier if you read a few text books.
 
Nothing about being the first Gospel, nothing contradictory to what I'm saying.
It does actually, Mark and the other synoptics do not refer to Jesus in that way only John.

Messiah, son of god, son of man and god almighty ate not interchangable. They are different things.
 
It does actually, Mark and the other synoptics do not refer to Jesus in that way only John.

Where's the contradiction?

Messiah, son of god, son of man and god almighty ate not interchangable. They are different things.

Of course, who's suggesting otherwise? Who are called sons of God? Jesus was, among others, so was Michael and Satan. Angels. Spirit beings. Jesus was Michael before he was Jesus. I can't imagine where you get that is suggested as being equal to God. The trinity is Platonic. Well, older than that, but it isn't Biblical.
 
Because the words are not interchangable, they are different things.

When I tell the so-called skeptics that the word god simply means mighty/strong one and is applied to men, angels, inanimate objects, pagan gods, Moses, judges, Jesus, Satan, angels their response is sophomoric, that of course those are gods but we are talking about God, god can't be anything because then the word would be meaningless, then their argument is that all of those words are not interchangeable. Those things can't be gods. Which is it? They are or they can't?

Messiah, or Christ, means savior. David was a messiah; Jesus was a messiah. sons of God is exactly what it says. Not biological because God is creator, not progenitor in a biological sense, spirit not flesh. Angels and men because he created both. We call God the Father. Jesus was not from this world, he was from heaven, a spirit creature and also later, a man, then back to heaven as a spirit creature. Only Jehovah is ever called God almighty. At Isaiah 9:6 Jesus is called mighty god but not God almighty.
 
Last edited:
"Before Abraham was I am."

When the earth was created the angels cried out in joy. They were there before man. Abraham was a man. (Job 38:7)

"If you have seen me you have seen the father."

Jesus was the perfect representation, the logos, spokesperson, for the father.

Who has seen God and what does it mean to see God 'face to face.?'

Did Abraham? Genesis 18:1-3 Note that Jehovah god is mistaken for one of the three men. Was God a man or an angel in the form of a man who represented God?

Did Moses? Numbers 12:8 - Note that it is an apperance of God that represents God to Moses.

Did Jacob? Genesis 32:30 - Note Hosea 12:2-4 points out that it was an angel who represented God that grappled with Jacob.

Did Manoah and his wife? Judges 13:2-22 - Note that the angel of Jehovah God is called Jehovah God.

Did Gideon? Judges 6:11-23 - Later Jehovah's angel came and sat under the big tree that was in Ophrah, which belonged to Joash the Abiezrite, while Gideon his son was beating out wheat in the winepress so as to get it quickly out of the sight of Midian. Then Jehovah's angel appeared to him and said to him: "Jehovah is with you, you valiant, mighty one." At this Gideon said to him: "Excuse me, my lord, but if Jehovah is with us, then why has all this come upon us, and where are all his wonderful acts that our fathers related to us, saying, 'Was it not out of Egypt that Jehovah brought us up?' And now Jehovah has deserted us, and he gives us into the palm of Midian." Upon that Jehovah faced him and said: "Go in this power of yours, and you will certainly save Israel out of Midian's palm. Do I not send you?" In turn he said to him: "Excuse me, Jehovah. With what shall I save Israel? Look! My thousand is the least in Manasseh, and I am the smallest in my father's house." But Jehovah said to him: "Because I shall prove to be with you, and you will certainly strike down Midian as if one man."

At this he said to him: "If, now, I have found favor in your eyes, you must also perform a sign for me that you are the one speaking with me. Do not, please, move away from here until I come to you and I have brought out my gift and set it before you." Accordingly he said: "I, for my part, shall keep sitting here until you return." And Gideon went in and proceeded to make ready a kid of the goats and an ephah of flour as unfermented cakes. The meat he put in the basket, and the broth he put in the cooking pot, after which he brought it out to him under the big tree and served it.

The angel of the [true] God now said to him: "Take the meat and the unfermented cakes and set them on the big rock there, and pour out the broth." At that he did so. Then Jehovah's angel thrust out the tip of the staff that was in his hand and touched the meat and the unfermented cakes, and fire began to ascend out of the rock and to consume the meat and the unfermented cakes. As for Jehovah's angel, he vanished from his sight. Consequently Gideon realized that it was Jehovah's angel.

At once Gideon said: "Alas, Sovereign Lord Jehovah, for the reason that I have seen Jehovah's angel face to face!" But Jehovah said to him: "Peace be yours. Do not fear. You will not die." So Gideon built an altar there to Jehovah, and it continues to be called Jehovah-shalom down to this day. It is yet in Ophrah of the Abiezrites.

No man has seen God but a few have seen representations of him. The angels are, in a sense, at least to the people they deal with, the same as God. In order for men to see them they have to take human form. They are angels, men, and because they speak for God, represent him, they are God as well in that sense.

"In the beginning was the word and the word was with god and the word WAS god."

John 1:1 (KJV) - "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

1808: "and the word was a god." The New Testament, in an Improved Version, Upon the Basis of Archbishop Newcome's New Translation: With a Corrected Text, London.

1864: "and a god was the Word." The Emphatic Diaglott, by Benjamin Wilson, New York and London.

1935: "and the Word was divine." The Bible-An American Translation, by J. M. P. Smith and E. J. Goodspeed, Chicago.

1935: "the Logos was divine." A New Translation of the Bible, by James Moffatt, New York.

1975: "and a god (or, of a divine kind) was the Word." Das Evangelium nach Johannes, by Siegfried Schulz, Gottingen, Germany.

1978: "and godlike sort was the Logos." Das Evangelium nach Johannes, by Johannes Schneider, Berlin.

1979: "and a god was the Logos." Das Evangelium nach Johannes, by Jurgen Becker, Wurzburg, Germany.

John 1:1 - In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God (Literally "was toward the God." Greek en pros ton Theon; Christian Greek Scriptures, Heb., by Franz Delitzsch, London, 1981 ed., Christian Greek Scriptures, Heb., by Isaac Salkinson and C. D. Ginsburg, London. the Hebrew, hayah eth ha Elohim), and the Word was a god (Greek, theos, in contrast with ton Theon, "the God," in the same sentence; Hebrew, welohim, "and god.")

The Greek word theos is a singular predicate noun occurring before the verb and is not preceded by the definite article. This is an anarthrous theos. The God with whom the Word, or Logos, was originally is designated here by the Greek expression ho theos, that is, theos preceded by the definite article ho. This is an articular theos. The articular construction of the noun points to an identity, a personality, whereas a singular anarthrous predicate noun preceding the verb points to a quality about someone. John was saying that the Word or Logos was "a god" or "divine" or "godlike" rather than that he was the God with whom he was.

There are many cases of a singular anarthrous predicate noun preceding the verb, such as in Mark 6:49; 11:32; John 4:19; 6:70; 8:44; 9:17; 10:1, 13, 33; 12:6. Where "a" or "an" is inserted "an apparition" or "a spirit" or "a liar" or "a prophet" or "a god."

In the article "Qualitative Anarthrous Predicate Nouns: Mark 15:39 and John 1:1," published in the Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 92, Philadelphia, 1973, p. 85, Philip B. Harner said about John 1:1: "with an anarthrous predicate preceding the verb, are primarily qualitative in meaning. They indicate that the logos has the nature of theos. There is no basis for regarding the predicate theos as definite." On p. 87 of his article, Harner concluded: "In John 1:1 I think that the qualitative force of the predicate is so prominent that the noun cannot be regarded as definite."

In other words, Jesus was a god, which is completely in harmony with scripture. Jesus was prophetically called a mighty god (Hebrew El Gibbohr) at Isaiah 9:6.

John 1:14 - "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

Jesus was the word, or spokesperson, of Jehovah God. He existed in heaven in spirit form before he came to earth. (John 3:13; 6:51; 17:5)

John 8:58 - "Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am."

A Grammar of the Idiom of the New Testament, by G. B. Winer, seventh edition, Andover, 1897, p. 267, says: "Sometimes the Present includes also a past tense (Mdv. 108), viz. when the verb expresses a state which commenced at an earlier period but still continues, a state in its duration; as, Jno. xv. 27 aparkhes met emou este], viii. 58 prin Abraam genesthai ego eimi."

A Grammar of New Testament Greek, by J. H. Moulton, Vol. III, by Nigel Turner, Edinburgh, 1963, p. 62, says: "The Present which indicates the continuance of an action during the past and up to the moment of speaking is virtually the same as Perfective, the only difference being that the action is conceived as still in progress . . . It is frequent in the N[ew] T[estament]: Lk 248 137 . . . 1529 . . . Jn 56 858 . . . "

Before Abraham came into existence is the first person singular present indicative and so properly translated with the perfect indicative. So from the fourth/fifth century the Syriac edition translates John 8:58 as "before Abraham was, I have been." (A Translation of the Four Gospels from the Syriac of the Sinaitic Palimpsest, by Agnes Smith Lewis, London, 1894.

From the fifth century the Curetonian Syriac Edition translates "before ever Abraham came to be, I was." (The Curetonian Version of the Four Gospels, by F. Crawford Burkitt, Vol. 1, Cambridge, England, 1904)

The Syriac Peshitta Edition, The Old Georgian Version, also from the fifth century and the Ethiopic Edition of the sixth century all do the same.

In an attempt to confuse Jesus as Jehovah some suggest that ego eimi is the same as the Hebrew expression ani hu, "I am he," which is used by God, but it is also used by man. (1 Chronicles 21:17)

Others try and use the Septuagint's reading of Exodus 3:14 which reads Ego eimi ho on meaning "I am The Being," or "I am The Existing One" which can't be sustained because the expression at Exodus 3:14 is different than John 8:58.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top