Exactly.Let's start with "how can you prove something supernatural..."
You can't.
I dunno. I'd say it's not impossible.Let's start with "how can you prove something supernatural..."
You can't.
Correction: It never seems to happen to me.I dunno. I'd say it's not impossible.
.....
So I'd say it's not that you can't - in principle - prove such things. It's just that it doesn't ever seem to happen.
Well, a mile-tall dude who turns the whole world inside out would necessarily alert quite a few people. It's the clue it's probably not just a hallucination.Correction: It never seems to happen to me.
Can you not use your brain to imagine an example of a supernatural experience(seeing a ghost, out of body, nde) that is within the context of subjective experiences. As it happens, Jesus appeared to over 500 people after the resurrection, was that a mass hallucination in your mind?Well, a mile-tall dude who turns the whole world inside out would necessarily alert quite a few people. It's the clue it's probably not just a hallucination.
It never happens for a reason. And if you can't reason you'll never understand why that reason demands reason.I dunno. I'd say it's not impossible.
If a mile-tall guy - in a white robe, with a huge white beard, and a staff that was topped with a glowing 'G' the size a hot air balloon - appeared out of the clouds and hovered over my house and zapped me straight to hell while turning the planet inside out, I might take that as proof of God.
If an apparition appeared - ephemeral bones and chains and all - floating in my room and whisked me away throgh the roof, flying over the landscape to visit my dead father as a boy in his childhood home - I might be convinced ghosts exist.
So I'd say it's not that you can't - in principle - prove such things. It's just that it doesn't ever seem to happen.
I am unable to parse this. Can you rephrase?Can you not use your brain to imagine an example of a supernatural experience(seeing a ghost, out of body, nde) that is within the context of subjective experiences.
What makes you think this? Who told you this? The Bible perhaps?As it happens, Jesus appeared to over 500 people after the resurrection
This is not a matter of established fact though. It is written in the gospels, sure, but as the gospels were written from one another (Matthew and Luke using Mark, and John coming along later:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel) there is no real corroboration by multiple independent sources. The gospels are not regarded by most scholars as historical documentary accounts.Can you not use your brain to imagine an example of a supernatural experience(seeing a ghost, out of body, nde) that is within the context of subjective experiences. As it happens, Jesus appeared to over 500 people after the resurrection, was that a mass hallucination in your mind?
The new testament is a historic document. Of course there's facts."The Bible is the only proof of the Bible I need." One of my hillbilly cousins. Any one of them.
Yes. All documents from the past contain only facts. Parables, allegories, intepretation and fiction were all invented in the early 21st century.The new testament is a historic document. Of course there's facts.
And lies.The new testament is a historic document. Of course there's facts.
He didn't say it was all facts, just that there are some facts in it.Yes. All documents from the past contain only facts. Parables, allegories, intepretation and fiction were all invented in the early 21st century.
Unusual thing for you to say.Yes. All documents from the past contain only facts. Parables, allegories, intepretation and fiction were all invented in the early 21st century.
I'm deciding what books in the new testament ring true. I have 3 gospels so far, I could be completely wrong, but so could you. Care to admit that?And lies.
And lies.
And lies.
And lies.
The < sarcasm >< /sarcasm > was implicit. I will try to eschew them in our future dialogues.Unusual thing for you to say.
10% trust at best.I'm deciding what books in the new testament ring true. I have 3 gospels so far, I could be completely wrong, but so could you. Care to admit that?
Historic, yes. Historical, no.The new testament is a historic document. Of course there's facts.