Deadly shooting at US university

sorry i didnt see the need to answer all of the questions, just informing you of the definition of a terrorist i thought was adaquate.

I thought your one answer rendered the other questions kind of moot, and displayed how silly and pointless they were.

Maybe it's just me.
 
If this wasn't terrorism what is?

A politically motivated action intended to scare a civilian populace into submission and meet the demand(s) of the perpetrators of the action.
A freedom-fighter from the other perspective.
 
Few questions for every one.



1-How come no one blamed it on muslims yet?
No muslims involved...although during the infamous DC sniper attacks no one blamed muslims either (even though both shooters involved were muslim)

567 said:
2- Why wasn't it called Terrorism?
Because it doesn't fit the definition of terrorism.....

567 said:
3- Is it only terrorism when muslims are involve?
No one calls the DC Sniper attacks terrorism even though ALL people involved were Islamic....

The Oklahoma City Bombing is called terrorism by ALL yet no muslims were involved...only a white Christian....

567 said:
4-So it is okay to call 5 imams terrorists who were praying at the airport, but not okay to call this ruthless killer a terrorist cause he wasn't muslims?
No...see above...

567 said:
5- How come BBC and CNN didn't mentioned his religion yet? Why haven't they called him Atheist Killer or Christian killer or Budhist killer?
Religion played no direct role in this attack of violence...you cannot say the same for radical Islam...
 
No muslims involved...although during the infamous DC sniper attacks no one blamed muslims either (even though both shooters involved were muslim)


Because it doesn't fit the definition of terrorism.....


No one calls the DC Sniper attacks terrorism even though ALL people involved were Islamic....

The Oklahoma City Bombing is called terrorism by ALL yet no muslims were involved...only a white Christian....


No...see above...


Religion played no direct role in this attack of violence...you cannot say the same for radical Islam...


Mass murder is part of the deifination of terrorism. So, it is terrorism. For your first point.



DC sniper was called terrorist all along, it was labeled terrorism and serial shooting all along.


Only one person had a Muslim name, Malvo wasn't muslim, neither the So called muhammad person, who never attended any mosque or related to any islamic institution, by having a muslim name doesn't make you muslim.



OKC bombing was pre 9/11 and people didn't even care about islam or muslims back then.



In plenty of killng, incidents and events through out the world, where Islam doesn't play any role and people are just happened to be muslism. The Religion is mentioned specially in news to make a point that It was Islamic Person not any other religion, specially bbc, cnn and fox play this game very well. I am sure you weren't born yesterday, you have see the world.

For example, in texas they have stopped 2 arabs and called them terrorist and all over the news they were mentioned as Two Muslims arrested not two arabs or americans even though they were born citizen and their fault was they had bunch of cell phones, legally purchased for reslae. So their religion was metioned million times for no reason and they were called terrorist for owning cell phones. FThey were called muslim terrorist even though they were released finally and had no charges againstthem.

Same thing happened to 3 medical students in FL, they were falsely called terrorist and their religion was mentioned million times in the news even though they had nothing to do with terrorism, they were just called terrorist. Just like those 5 imams were called terrorist. I am sure you have seen the news and you are not one of those selective readers. So, i wonder why this peson wasn't called Christian or any other relgion mentioned in news? Why this fucked up practice of mentioning relgion is only limited to islam? Fox, cnn and bbc.... all silence?

Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
DC sniper was not terrorism.
Terrorists have political goals. If you're only goal is to kill lots of people its not really terrorism. Or your goals are personal - not terrorism.
 
Last edited:
guns should be banned.

So should arab hijackers. Box knives should be banned. Fertilizer should be banned too after what happened at Oklahoma City.

I have more things to add to the ban list:

arsenic
sleeping pills
alchoholic beverages
cigarettes
automobiles when Ted Kennedy is at the wheel
 
Last edited:
So should arab hijackers. Box knives should be banned. Fertilizer should be banned too after what happened at Oklahoma City.
Are Christian hijackers OK? American hijackers? Asian hijackers? How 'bout gay hijackers. Just ARAB hijackers.:rolleyes:
 
Are Christian hijackers OK? American hijackers? Asian hijackers? How 'bout gay hijackers. Just ARAB hijackers.:rolleyes:

You forget about cuban hijackers, Maybe before your time. I lived through the cuban missle crisis. We had a bomb shelter in our basement for the pending nuclear attack.
 
Last edited:
Here's the cuban missle crisis:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Missle_Crisis

Castro got drunk one day, and tried to start World War III:

Castro, on the other hand, was convinced an invasion is soon at hand, and after an evening of drinking, dictated a letter to Khrushchev that appeared to call for a pre-emptive strike on the U.S..

See what a little drinking can do?
 
Last edited:
Here's something wierd:
Several reports also suggest that the killer died with the opaque scriptural reference, "Ismael-Ax", written on his arm in red ink. "Ismael-Ax" could refer to God's request that Abraham kill his own son, before God intervenes on the boy's behalf. In the Judao-Christian tradition, the son is Isaac, the father of the Jewish people. Islamic texts hold that the subject is his older half-brother Ismail. In some versions, of the story the instrument is a knife, and in others it is an axe.
It's also rumored that Ismael Ax was his XBOX Live gamertag.
 
Sorry I left out the link. It's from the Independent. Nothing at all to do with Fox News.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2458872.ece

So are you saying that he was a christian terrorist after all? Since he wasn't muslim... must be following christianity or judiasm?


Oh forgot to add:

Several reports also suggest that the killer died with the opaque scriptural reference, "Ismael-Ax", written on his arm in red ink. "Ismael-Ax"could refer to God's request that Abraham kill his own son, before God intervenes on the boy's behalf. In the Judao-Christian tradition, the son is Isaac, the father of the Jewish people. Islamic texts hold that the subject is his older half-brother Ismail. In some versions, of the story the instrument is a knife, and in others it is an axe.

Funny how madanthon selectivey and the cornies of Birtish media mokeys tried to look like that it was Related to islamic text. LMAO- these british news papers makes me sick.
 
So are you saying that he was a christian terrorist after all? Since he wasn't muslim... must be following christianity or judiasm?
In madant's world ONLY Arabs and Muslims can be terrorists. If a mentally challenged Arab student had done this it would be officially declared terror attack. :rolleyes: I wonder if McVeigh's body was examined for ARABIC SIGNS!:eek: :eek:
 
So are you saying that he was a christian terrorist after all? Since he wasn't muslim... must be following christianity or judiasm?


Oh forgot to add:

Several reports also suggest that the killer died with the opaque scriptural reference, "Ismael-Ax", written on his arm in red ink. "Ismael-Ax"could refer to God's request that Abraham kill his own son, before God intervenes on the boy's behalf. In the Judao-Christian tradition, the son is Isaac, the father of the Jewish people. Islamic texts hold that the subject is his older half-brother Ismail. In some versions, of the story the instrument is a knife, and in others it is an axe.

Funny how madanthon selectivey and the cornies of Birtish media mokeys tried to look like that it was Related to islamic text. LMAO- these british news papers makes me sick.

Duh serves me right for surfing when I'm beat, I didn't even catch it.:p
 
In madant's world ONLY Arabs and Muslims can be terrorists. If a mentally challenged Arab student had done this it would be officially declared terror attack. :rolleyes: I wonder if McVeigh's body was examined for ARABIC SIGNS

Not only that, anything to do with islamic is terrorism to him. Please refrain from writing that word since in his dictionary it means terrorism. :eek:

First of all the cowards in biritani have one purpose in mind, blame every thing on islamic. Simple and easy get away and best way to make money since people love the ultimate bad guys started after nine eleven.
 
In madant's world ONLY Arabs and Muslims can be terrorists. If a mentally challenged Arab student had done this it would be officially declared terror attack. :rolleyes: I wonder if McVeigh's body was examined for ARABIC SIGNSQUOTE]

Oh he was arabic, he just looked white, they have already said in the early days of nine eleven that he had training from OBL. Anything they can come up with to relate it to obl or extremists. :cool:
 
Back
Top