No muslims involved...although during the infamous DC sniper attacks no one blamed muslims either (even though both shooters involved were muslim)
Because it doesn't fit the definition of terrorism.....
No one calls the DC Sniper attacks terrorism even though ALL people involved were Islamic....
The Oklahoma City Bombing is called terrorism by ALL yet no muslims were involved...only a white Christian....
No...see above...
Religion played no direct role in this attack of violence...you cannot say the same for radical Islam...
Mass murder is part of the deifination of terrorism. So, it is terrorism. For your first point.
DC sniper was called terrorist all along, it was labeled terrorism and serial shooting all along.
Only one person had a Muslim name, Malvo wasn't muslim, neither the So called muhammad person, who never attended any mosque or related to any islamic institution, by having a muslim name doesn't make you muslim.
OKC bombing was pre 9/11 and people didn't even care about islam or muslims back then.
In plenty of killng, incidents and events through out the world, where Islam doesn't play any role and people are just happened to be muslism. The Religion is mentioned specially in news to make a point that It was Islamic Person not any other religion, specially bbc, cnn and fox play this game very well. I am sure you weren't born yesterday, you have see the world.
For example, in texas they have stopped 2 arabs and called them terrorist and all over the news they were mentioned as Two Muslims arrested not two arabs or americans even though they were born citizen and their fault was they had bunch of cell phones, legally purchased for reslae. So their religion was metioned million times for no reason and they were called terrorist for owning cell phones. FThey were called muslim terrorist even though they were released finally and had no charges againstthem.
Same thing happened to 3 medical students in FL, they were falsely called terrorist and their religion was mentioned million times in the news even though they had nothing to do with terrorism, they were just called terrorist. Just like those 5 imams were called terrorist. I am sure you have seen the news and you are not one of those selective readers. So, i wonder why this peson wasn't called Christian or any other relgion mentioned in news? Why this fucked up practice of mentioning relgion is only limited to islam? Fox, cnn and bbc.... all silence?
Any thoughts?