If they didn't have a good eye for art, they wouldn't undertake this particular prank.riku_124 said:I wasn't saying the farmers were making it i was saying the "pranksters" would have to have a very good eye of art.
Stryder:
Please note the farmer (quite rightly) got damages from the Ministry of Defence, who were nominally in charge of the men who had done the damage. Nobody has ever suggested that a site that only had a hyperlink to a site which encouraged actionable activity would ever be liable to being sued. It is the site with the information which is liable, if that.Stryder said:The Farmer supposedly sought damages for the whole field from the Ministry for the corner that the men had cut across so apparently they snuck back late one night and finished the rest of the field off.
(I'm not making any claims about links to sites with illegal activities or content.)