blackholesun
Registered Senior Member
By process of elimination based on known laws of physics of the possible ideas, till you have a few hypothetical and probable theories that the known facts allow for. Because of the known trajectories and physical properties of the impacts we thus eliminate “rubble pile comets” from causing them. We offer the only other plausible and logical theory.
We have seen a comet tidally disrupted. We have not seen any evidence indicating a spactacular interplanetary war. No city ruins, no floating abandoned spacecraft..your "theory" (more like a hypothesis) is based more on the laws of Star Trek than anything else. Therefore you offer nothing in evidence other than some photos and the belief that you are good at probability without a lick of an ETI factor. Rolling a die is not a comet breaking up. It is not flipping a coin or mixing a bag of M&M's around. It has been proven by that statistics tread that is NOT impossible for those type of impacts to happen. For a universe this big and all the time its had in the world there is no reason impacts like that can't happen multiple times on Moons and Planets that have virtually no atmosphere.
We have seen a comet tidally disrupted. We have not seen any evidence indicating a spactacular interplanetary war. No city ruins, no floating abandoned spacecraft..your "theory" (more like a hypothesis) is based more on the laws of Star Trek than anything else. Therefore you offer nothing in evidence other than some photos and the belief that you are good at probability without a lick of an ETI factor. Rolling a die is not a comet breaking up. It is not flipping a coin or mixing a bag of M&M's around. It has been proven by that statistics tread that is NOT impossible for those type of impacts to happen. For a universe this big and all the time its had in the world there is no reason impacts like that can't happen multiple times on Moons and Planets that have virtually no atmosphere.