Church will burn Quran

Yes, granted, there were tensions. Yours truly magnified underlying tensions (the exact nature of which is for another thread) into a Hollywood blockbuster. He was gonna git Bin Laden dead or alive. Since then, from the US perspective, every Muslim has been typecast as a terrorist, and Islam as an evil.

Actually, how many TV shows have so represented Muslims since 9/11? Or even since the first WTC bombing attempt?
 
TV Shows, Films, and the media generally, very rarely depict people with any religious views, or for that matter political views, whatever. To do that would require scriptwriters to produce three dimensional characters.
 
TV Shows, Films, and the media generally, very rarely depict people with any religious views, or for that matter political views, whatever. To do that would require scriptwriters to produce three dimensional characters.
true but not the reason. Their sponsor wants all viewers to identify with some characters or at least certainly not be offended by a character with different religious or political POV.

I think most script writers would love to create 3D characters, but if they did, they would need to find a new job.

Part of the appeal of the old Archie bunker show was that it had 3D characters but carefully balanced between red neck Archie and hippie left wing boyfriend of daughter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just want to say, in light of this turn out in this situation, in all do respect and I mean in all do respect, suck it Christians.
 
You're confusing him with the third greatest Republican..
mn_reagan_bonzo.jpg
Ronald didn't realise as he fed Baby George that as time unfolded both of them would be President of the Greatest Country on Earth
 
.

1400 years of religious law and societal suppression suggests those tensions have existed for a long, long time.

correction: the extremism in some muslim countries, and suppression, only appeared in the late 3 centuries, that's when the muslim civilisation copletly fell, and europe woke up.
 
Loosing control over two major trade routes can do that. That said, Muslim "Civilization" wasn't going anywhere in a hurry - that's for sure. I wonder why?
 
correction: the extremism in some muslim countries, and suppression, only appeared in the late 3 centuries, that's when the muslim civilisation copletly fell, and europe woke up.

So that's how they teach history in a Muslim country...eh?
 
I just want to say, in light of this turn out in this situation, in all do respect and I mean in all do respect, suck it Christians.

There is nothing so sublime as the distain of fools. Also you forgot atheists.

correction: the extremism in some muslim countries, and suppression, only appeared in the late 3 centuries, that's when the muslim civilisation copletly fell, and europe woke up.

Wrong. Mecca on up.
 
I just want to say, in light of this turn out in this situation, in all do respect and I mean in all do respect, suck it Christians.

It seems Islamism did suck up to Christianity and the Hebrew bible, only it selected what it thought would win over both these belief systems. It appears that first the new Muslims tried to impress the Jews by doctrines of Judaism, then it took from the Gospels - it discarded the resurrection because it saw this as Jews being more correct here, as opposed being different. But it did not work - Judaism and Christianity saw the ploy of a half backed acceptance, then assumed as transcended by the figurehead of Mohammed. Islam has to use the sword and mass murder to beget its adherants, and maintains this today by threats for anyone having second thoughts.
.
I looked but see nothing new given by Islam, all its doctrines and practices come directly from other belief systems: facing a sacred place when praying; making a blessing when a sacred name is mentioned; prompt burial of the dead; Hallal instead of Kosher; exaggerated doctrines of modest dress and behaviour advocated in Judaism; etc - are direct lift-offs from Judaism and cannot in any wise be seen as new revelation. But such is the nature of the beasts of religions, belief being the easiest faculty to exploit.
 
It seems Islamism did suck up to Christianity and the Hebrew bible, only it selected what it thought would win over both these belief systems. It appears that first the new Muslims tried to impress the Jews by doctrines of Judaism, then it took from the Gospels - it discarded the resurrection because it saw this as Jews being more correct here, as opposed being different. But it did not work - Judaism and Christianity saw the ploy of a half backed acceptance, then assumed as transcended by the figurehead of Mohammed. Islam has to use the sword and mass murder to beget its adherants, and maintains this today by threats for anyone having second thoughts.
.
I looked but see nothing new given by Islam, all its doctrines and practices come directly from other belief systems: facing a sacred place when praying; making a blessing when a sacred name is mentioned; prompt burial of the dead; Hallal instead of Kosher; exaggerated doctrines of modest dress and behaviour advocated in Judaism; etc - are direct lift-offs from Judaism and cannot in any wise be seen as new revelation. But such is the nature of the beasts of religions, belief being the easiest faculty to exploit.

Such drivel.
 
Or you'd get charged with a hate-crime for insulting Islam. :shrug:

Hate crime: the mosque dumped in Jerusalem, perpetrated with 20/20 vision of a genocidal aspiration. Otherwise presented as a blessing to kill the infidels and today represented in the charade of a mosque to be dumped on the 9/11 site. Maybe the mosque in Jerusalem is meant to show Islam is a peaceful religion - you think!? G-thanx and same to Mecca!
 
Such drivel.

More drivel: Today Muslims pray facing Mecca. But originally, they prayed facing Jerusalem, thinking this would make all Jews salute them and sign on the dooted line of the quran - this was abruptly changed when the Jews rejected this offer! It was not Allah but Mohammed to changed his mind when rebuffed.
 
Back
Top