Please take it in context I was referring to quadraphonics description as below .Oops. Too late now.The story the thread presented was of individual MPs expressing their concern for capital punishment for sexual behavior
On page 3 I was quite clear .The story the thread presented was of individual MPs expressing their concern for capital punishment for sexual behaviorThe statements of individual MPs do not amount to any kind of official stance of the Government of Britain. General persecution of gays in Iran does not, by itself, amount to proof that any particular individual is going to be tortured or executed. Admitting every Iranian homosexual who wanted asylum in Britain is not a feasible policy, regardless of what the law is. Which is to say that said law will likely be changed, if it is determined to apply to Iranian homosexuals.
My argument is very clear if ,as the original thread news story is concerned , that Members of Parliament representing the British Government are taking Iran to task over its torture and execution of Homosexuals then why does this same Government refuse to acknowledge Homosexual Iranian applicants for asylum protection on the basis that such persecution is non existent .
Whence why I am asking you these questions .Oh, and one more thing: Britain's seeming two-facedness on deportation has nothing to do with the repeated statements of Ahmendinejidad or his ministers regarding the judicial murder of homosexuals. Apparently, though, you're not overly concerned with their fate, since most of what you seem to be doing is trolling.
Yes I did , I read the Wiki article and investigated this item .nor the wiki entry
And I commented below .As of 2007, teenagers accused of engaging in sodomy have been executed, although the official rationale for the hangings is debated.
So why should I accept the Wiki article as accurate Geoff when they post as sources that have clearly been debunked as inaccurate , deliberately deceptive and politically charged by Human Rights and Gay Groups ?And concerning the much publicized executions of 2 youngsters for homosexual sex , was really propagandaMahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni
Controversy
Within weeks of the hangings, both reporters and human rights organizations--while continuing to condemn the brutality of the hangings--began to produce more nuanced accounts. Paula Ettelbrick, executive director of the International Gay & Lesbian Human Rights Commission, told the press, “It was not a gay case”[14]
The U.S. periodical The Nation published a lengthy investigation of the story. It criticized the role of Peter Tatchell and Outrage! in spreading the belief the executed youths were gay before it had examined the evidence. The article concluded that, given Peter Tatchell's "recent statements, it seems likely that his ideological disposition caused him to look past or dismiss information that cast doubt on the 'gay teenagers' story." [1]
You didn't explain Ahmendinejidad's comments
Because you clearly made this statement here :nor those of his minister
Wherein those statements quoted by you does Ahmendinejidad or his Minister state that currently Iran is torturing and executing persons convicted of Homosexual acts ?Oh, and one more thing: Britain's seeming two-facedness on deportation has nothing to do with the repeated statements of Ahmendinejidad or his ministers regarding the judicial murder of homosexuals. .