How can something that has never been 'alive' be dead, ....
Atheism is a belief.
- Thread starter Tht1Gy!
- Start date
How can something that has never been 'alive' be dead, ....
:zzz:
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
Perhaps, where God is concerned extremely likely. But they don't want to know..
lolFuck it. they are working on their term paper and I'm just auditing the class.
So there.
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
Right here. All my building blocks are dead, or rather non-living.
Of course I am alive according to the standing definition, which I fully subscribe to.
My point is just that there is no such thing as a magical life force or some other metaphysical stuff like that.
It's a personal statement, you don't need to defend your views because of it
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
I didn't realize that was about you..
I don't get why you are satisfied with a life philosophy that you know may possibly be wrong. Well actually that I can still get.
But you said that even if you were wrong you wouldn't care because it helps you in life.. thats mainly what I don't get. It is kind of lying to yourself.
bah, so do you. we all do, we can be kind of choosey about the books is all.
Not really no.
Don't cop out, answer.
I thought you were being a wise ass...
If you truly want an answer, pls restate the question.
Last edited:
If this is to me, KMA! You have no fucking idea what I believe.
Ps.
This implies that atoms came into existence fairly recently.
Not really because, well, you believe what you believe, which might be wrong. But it helps you make sense of the world. Science is turned on it's head from tim to time...
When that happens, we deal with it and adjust our paradigm. Ya know?
I don't mean to imply that if someone could prove without a shadow of a doubt that my beliefs were wrong I would still cling to them. Also, I have "proven" my beliefs to my self to my satisfaction. I neither care nor wish to convince you or anyone else of them. If someone is interested, we'll talk. But I've seen proof, proof enough for me, so I have no wish to 'argue'.
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
It's cool, I must have misunderstood.
No worries, I didn't think you were arguing or trying to argue with me. If I came at you with too much energy it's because I have had those exchanges in the past and sometimes still do get sucked into them. It was not intended to be directed at you, per se.
You strike me as being in this category; not looking to be convinced but curious and open.
Also your question was a fair one, so I answered it. No big deal.
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
Damn right I am interested
I read that thread you linked me to, but it's still a bit vague.
If you don't mind I'd like to know more about your personal experiences.
But it will have to be tomorrow though, I'm off for now..
Yes but it's a bit muddled. I don't want to re-read, I am asking you to please restate it. See, I was just flipping Emnos shit, you know? Teasing him. So the origanal question that I asked is not suited to a serious response. Look, I know, I read something on another thread I'll post.
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1939730&postcount=123
Enmos
Valued Senior Member