The trope of the executive who does no work because he isn't swinging a wrench and getting his hands dirty (or perhaps Lucille Balling on the conveyor belt) no doubt has appeal to the lowest common denominators out there
That trope has nothing to do with my post, however. (swinging a wrench?)
The only executives I referred to are the ones caught between ignorant and absentee ownership's minions and the working floor they manage; and the single but representative illustrative example - taken from life, not "populist tripe" - of a new hire by said ignorant and absentee ownership. Those are both examples of hardworking, busy, diligent executives doing their demanding jobs as they understand them to the best of their abilities.
It's a simple fact that open plan offices, encouragement (and even requirement) of long working hours, and the like, are still trending, still more common, now. These and related restorations of pre New Deal practices are taking over wherever politics does not step in - and political oversight is being cut back. That is the context of this:
If you are trying to decide between the company's well-being and the employee's - you are missing the whole point of employees.
They are. That is, the contributors to this trend and enforcers of the practices and supporters of the concomitant politics are missing the normal informed person's, liberal and left, assumed "whole point of having employees".
Increasingly. This is visible on the ground, in the media, and in the numbers.
Meanwhile: These misreadings of yours, accompanied by irrelevant pejoratives, are becoming more frequent. Reading comprehension problems? A psychological need to fit my posting into some pre-ordained category of "populist"? (That's gotta be stretch, or a shrinkage, or inversion, or something, from my objectionable disparagements of Trump voters).
My guess: you have committed yourself to bothsiding all political issues, as befitting your notion of reasonableness in assessment of almost anything. Unfortunately, that very attempt puts you on one side of many Reagan Era issues - and it's by necessity one of the wrong sides, those being the only beneficiaries of false bothsiding. Hence the misreading - a straight reading won't allow your fit of your own approach.
But I'm open to other suggestions of what's going on here - "populist tripe" is a bizarre pejorative to find in an ostensible reply to one of my more elitist-leaning, university social science supporting, good management praising, loss of good management to reactionary anti-science policies and practices mourning, posts.