The motives presented in Paradise Now are twisted
Its the point of the film. Didn't you notice the live footage of Palestinians in the camp the day after the massacre at the end of the film? The thrust from the animated, dream version of reality to the stark reality? Its like you didn't watch the film at all.
It makes the leaders of the Palestinian movement look corrupt, self hating, self pitying and hateful towards others.
Wow, that fictional song is pretty comparable to them cutting off american soldiers heads.
They are? You think they should have shown how tanks rolling into Lebanon are manned by guys who can't shoot people?
I think Paradise now is an honest appraisal of Palestinian motives. A Waltz with Bashir is just more Israeli handwrininging and inability to see their actions for what they are.
And they are not? lol.
The motives may have been presented honestly but it doesn't enlist sympathy from the viewer. They were presented as lost and lazy.
It was beautifully made and it did present their actions for what they were, I don't know anyone who has seen the film who didn't think otherwise until now.
No its comparbale to them singing a rock song after they do it, blaming the victim for their actions. How would you feel about an animated film which did that?
Like Golda Meir famously said: “We can forgive the Arabs for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children”
Its a pretty common rhetoric in military apologetics.
Yes, the truth is banal and ugly. Do you think a nice song at the moment the bus blew up with the suicide bomber strumming an acoustic would have enlisted more sympathy?
I think they need better music and animation to show the artistic side of beheading.
I disagree, it was a charade and an insult to the victims who did not even merit the consideration shown to dogs and horses.
You should read Gideon Levy's take on it. Jewcy also did a very good review. Electronic intifada struggled to be objective but could not prevent their emotions showing through.
Why is it not surprising to me that you think murdering is artistic, not realistic and barbarian when an arabic person does it.
Why is it not surprising to me that you think murdering is artistic, not realistic and barbarian when an arabic person does it.
How about what song sounds better when they blow up an iraqi building with no NATO forces present (kill a couple hundred civillians). What's the most artistic part about that? Is it the choice in music, or the excellent camera view?
What other army has a song like this, and in the middle of a war, yet? Afterward they go on to sing thatLebanonIraq is the "love of my life, the short life." And then the tank, from inside of which this lofty and enlightened singing emanates, crushes a car for starters, turning it into a smashed tin can, then pounds a residential building, threatening to topple it. That's how we are. Singing and wrecking. Where else will you find sensitive soldiers like these? It would really be preferable for them to shout with hoarse voices: Death to the Arabs!
Don't you find it even remotely interesting that car bombings only occured in Iraq after the US invasion [just like the suicide bombings] and only after Negroponte took command?
Maybe the Iraqis could make a film about it:
But does that make it our fault that arabic people kill each other?
is saddam their unsung hero?
are they lost without their nazi dictactor?
No she never does. Muslims murdering muslims are never a concern to her
and talking to americans about that is gonna achieve what? another invasion?
/cackle
Hilarious. You're just the guy who doesn't want to kill but can't help riding the tanks that blow up the people, eh?
Seems like it, they were a secular country sans suicide and car bombs under him. Indians worked there as expat workers and praise Iraq to us.
Maybe the Iraqis could re-enact the war between loyalists and patriots for the benefit of mindless soldiers appalled at muslims killing muslims.