Apollo 11 press confrence*** I smell a hoax***!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sock puppet path said:
Lemme get this straight you are saying that NASA used an unprecedented amount of money, time and effort on a faked lunar landing but they couldn't be bothered to get some proper actors?
Click to expand...

That's absurd, if they used an actor instead of decorated airforce pilot the the hoax wouldn't of been credible at all. He's acting just like the typical Machurian candidate!
 
leopold99 said:
they did. remember the roll of aluminum foil?
Click to expand...

No they didn't, if they did why would they have to repeat it?

According to the Vision for Space Exploration, NASA plans to send astronauts back to the Moon by 2020 and, eventually, to set up an outpost. For people to live and work on the Moon safely, the radiation problem must be solved.

"We really need to know more about the radiation environment on the Moon, especially if people will be staying there for more than just a few days," says Harlan Spence, a professor of astronomy at Boston University.


Sign up for EXPRESS SCIENCE NEWS delivery

To carefully measure and map the Moon's radiation environment, NASA is developing a robotic probe to orbit the Moon beginning in 2008. Called the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), this scout will pave the way for future human missions not only by measuring space radiation, but also by hunting for frozen water and mapping the Moon's surface in unprecedented detail. LRO is a key part of NASA's Robotic Lunar Exploration Program, managed by the Goddard Space Flight Center.
Click to expand...

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/08sep_radioactivemoon.htm
 
Ganymede said:
That's absurd, if they used an actor instead of decorated airforce pilot the the hoax wouldn't of been credible at all. He's acting just like the typical Machurian candidate!
Click to expand...
who paid off the 10s of 1000s that worked on the project to keep their mouth shut?
 
Ganymede said:
That's absurd, if they used an actor instead of decorated airforce pilot the the hoax wouldn't of been credible at all. He's acting just like the typical Machurian candidate!
Click to expand...

Even cheaper with some acting coaching then isn't it....I mean really all that effort to do such a professional hoax and then just not bothering with the finishing touches?
 
So basicly what Nasa is saying is, they don't know the radiation levels on the moon. Therefore, theyr'e developing a probe that can retrieve that data. I find it very hard to believe that NASA would send men to the moon without even knowing the radiation levels on the moon. Nothing is survining outside of Earths magnetosphere, especially with 1960's technology.
 
Ganymede said:
So basicly what Nasa is saying is, they don't know the radiation levels on the moon.
Click to expand...
that's what the article you posted said isn't it? /sarcasm
I find it very hard to believe that NASA would send men to the moon without even knowing the radiation levels on the moon. Nothing is survining outside of Earths magnetosphere, especially with 1960's technology.
Click to expand...
NO ONE has ever said the moon landing was faked on their deathbed.
 
Perhaps they were sitting on 100 tons of dynamite programmed to go off if they muttered a single sentence exposing the hoax. They only just made it out alive.....
 
leopold99 said:
that's what the article you posted said isn't it? /sarcasm

NO ONE has ever said the moon landing was faked on their deathbed.
Click to expand...

Blustering conjecture signafies a weak argument, and a lack of emprical evidence to support your position.
 
Nickelodeon said:
Perhaps they were sitting on 100 tons of dynamite programmed to go off if they muttered a single sentence exposing the hoax. They only just made it out alive.....
Click to expand...

Out in deep space, radiation comes from all directions. On the Moon, you might expect the ground, at least, to provide some relief, with the solid body of the Moon blocking radiation from below. Not so.

When galactic cosmic rays collide with particles in the lunar surface, they trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/08sep_radioactivemoon.htm
 
look homeboy the russians flew the luna probes around the moon taking pictures, i'm sure if they could pummle our as they would.

who paid off the contractors?
why no deathbed statements?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top