Being my original post may I reiderate that these people speak in one language: death.
They don't understand civilized reason and compassion. The true definition of evil is the absence of empathy. As we sit hidden behind our glowing computer screens, typing furiously at our keyboards in a electronic sparing match thousands of men and women are being deployed to the middle east from various countries.
As we sit on the floor, or the desk or wherever you may be reading this the pillars of the United States government are plotting for a war of an unseen kind against an unseen enemy. I have heard civilian phraises like, "homeland defense", "the war effort," and other phraises that haven't been uttered since the Second World War.
Peace would be a comforting idea, but that's all, an idea. There will be no fruition to the plans for peace and reasoning with an enemy that has no ability to reason.
The blame will be put on us and already has for inciting this, by putting military bases in the middle east, and for medeling in mid-east affairs.
Well EXCUSE me, when the hell did full on invasions of other countries, become exclusivly a middle eastern problem? One, people were getting killed in Kuwait when the Iraqis invaded. Two it was a breach of international law, and three the petrolum output to the western world was indangered. Bin Laden would claim that we were attacking Islam in Somolia, when indeed we were preventing warloards from taking food and aid away from the Somali's.
The reason why we stayed is because the countries, and more specifically the people of the middle east have demonstrated time and time again that they cannot act with any thought of reason, except for that the only religion that belongs on the two continents and the world is theirs. Maybe if the people's of the middle east acted with some responsability, instead of the temper of a two-year-old then we wouldn't have to intervene.
Maybe if Osama Bin Laden would spend his fortune on food, education, and other basic privileges than there would be no problem in the middle east. If he had done that, there wouldn't be 6,000 dead, and an impending war.
So who is at fault, an idiot that is too blind to see the real reason for resolving problems with his resources, or a nation that has worked harder than any other to keep the peace around the world, at the exclusive expense of its taxpayers.
P.S. To anyone living outside of the US or Britian, why is that when you guys need help you bark to us, and when we suffer a national tradgedy you can't even pledge support or resources of any kind against an organization that aims to destroy everything free, and non-Islamic.
If you can provide a counter-point to some of my grievences, maybe I'll shut up.
Then again I am a loud mouth 15-year old American.
They don't understand civilized reason and compassion. The true definition of evil is the absence of empathy. As we sit hidden behind our glowing computer screens, typing furiously at our keyboards in a electronic sparing match thousands of men and women are being deployed to the middle east from various countries.
As we sit on the floor, or the desk or wherever you may be reading this the pillars of the United States government are plotting for a war of an unseen kind against an unseen enemy. I have heard civilian phraises like, "homeland defense", "the war effort," and other phraises that haven't been uttered since the Second World War.
Peace would be a comforting idea, but that's all, an idea. There will be no fruition to the plans for peace and reasoning with an enemy that has no ability to reason.
The blame will be put on us and already has for inciting this, by putting military bases in the middle east, and for medeling in mid-east affairs.
Well EXCUSE me, when the hell did full on invasions of other countries, become exclusivly a middle eastern problem? One, people were getting killed in Kuwait when the Iraqis invaded. Two it was a breach of international law, and three the petrolum output to the western world was indangered. Bin Laden would claim that we were attacking Islam in Somolia, when indeed we were preventing warloards from taking food and aid away from the Somali's.
The reason why we stayed is because the countries, and more specifically the people of the middle east have demonstrated time and time again that they cannot act with any thought of reason, except for that the only religion that belongs on the two continents and the world is theirs. Maybe if the people's of the middle east acted with some responsability, instead of the temper of a two-year-old then we wouldn't have to intervene.
Maybe if Osama Bin Laden would spend his fortune on food, education, and other basic privileges than there would be no problem in the middle east. If he had done that, there wouldn't be 6,000 dead, and an impending war.
So who is at fault, an idiot that is too blind to see the real reason for resolving problems with his resources, or a nation that has worked harder than any other to keep the peace around the world, at the exclusive expense of its taxpayers.
P.S. To anyone living outside of the US or Britian, why is that when you guys need help you bark to us, and when we suffer a national tradgedy you can't even pledge support or resources of any kind against an organization that aims to destroy everything free, and non-Islamic.
If you can provide a counter-point to some of my grievences, maybe I'll shut up.
Then again I am a loud mouth 15-year old American.