I wrote there in that same post why exactly God doesn't need any wife or child and why He sent down human prophets..
My point was it's ALL bullshit. See here:
God needed to have a Son. God also needed a wife. God did not need a Prophet - so any thing about Gods sun... I mean son, Jesus is based on fact anything about God's wife Sophia is also fact anything about Mohammad is completely made up.
You see chuuush, that's the funny thing about believing in an invisible flying spaghetti monster - you can make the sauce whatever flavor you like because it's all bullshit anyway.
BUT, what is pathetic is to see people argue over the flavor of the sauce. Kill in the name flying spaghetti monster over the flavor of the sauce.
See it goes JUST like this:
God doesn't and needn't have a son or a wife or any other entity to help him, guide him or advise him, but he sent down the prophets from human beings to guide their fellow humans to His path. Believing in more than one God is not monotheism.
God doesn't and needn't have a son
(because chuuush doesn't believe IT had a son) or a wife
(because chuuush doesn't believe IT had a wife [note: God did have a Gay lover once]) or any other entity to help him, guide him or advise him, but he sent down the prophets
(because chuuush believes he had Prophets) from human beings to guide their fellow humans to His path. Believing in more than one God is not monotheism.
Or this makes EQUALLY as much sense and, funny enough, we have
EQUALLY as much evidence for it, as evidence we have for you're assertions about God chuuush:
the flying spaghetti monster doesn't and needn't have a spoon or a fork or any other plate ware to serve him, portion him out him or mix him, but he sent down the great fork for human beings to guide their fellow humans to His noodles. Believing in more than one type of spaghetti is not monopastaian.
Michael