Yes . . . it's ME! . . . and who the HELL is AlphaNumeric (by comparison)?
1. Not electrical cabling . . .mechanical . . . an "analogy" to suggest how quarks, gluonss, and strings "may" physically interact (in Calabi-Yau space).
2. Yes . . .I know its (for you) 'hard to believe' . . .but I do have a scientific Ph.D. and numerous refereed publications.
3. 1+1=2 . . . is that enough (general) math for you? . . works for me! (note sarcasm). Random nonesense? . . . your unimaginative and noncreative posts sound like Bremsstrahlung (look it up!) to me!
The author clearly has no understanding of what physics involves, as there is absolutely zero quantitative work there. No models are constructed, only poor analogies and random guesses, based on physical intuition, such as the (extremely laughable) string thing at the end based on electrical cabling.
I find it hard to believe the author has a PhD, as that would imply the author has written a decent coherent thesis at some point but the website shows little to none of style or detail expected in such things.
The author seems unfamiliar with physics, nor science or mathematics in general. All in all it's the random nonsense produced by someone with no understanding of science but the delusion they aren't just writing crap.
1. Not electrical cabling . . .mechanical . . . an "analogy" to suggest how quarks, gluonss, and strings "may" physically interact (in Calabi-Yau space).
2. Yes . . .I know its (for you) 'hard to believe' . . .but I do have a scientific Ph.D. and numerous refereed publications.
3. 1+1=2 . . . is that enough (general) math for you? . . works for me! (note sarcasm). Random nonesense? . . . your unimaginative and noncreative posts sound like Bremsstrahlung (look it up!) to me!
Last edited: