Precognition: Precognition is much more involved using my methods and involves several processes, one of which is selecting numbers from a screen that are hidden in auto-stereo-grams such as this.
How is this precognition??
You seem to be confusing precognition with subliminal viewing.
You might tell people "don't look at the depth image"... but the brain doesn't work that way... the eyes focus automatically on an image and will automatically adjust focus.
While it takes conscious effort to actually focus on the specific depth to give the answer that is says "NO" with a ball bouncing horizontally in the background, the eyes could quite easily focus on it accidentally without conscious effort, even if just for a split second. The brain then recognises the pattern subconsciously.
And another confusion I have is with you saying that the stereograms are designed to induce a "tranc like state" which most likely results in the eyes relaxing, and defocussing from the near to the far (a more relaxed position)... and in doing so it would shift focus through the "depth" that displays the image.
So on one hand you're saying that you shouldn't focus on the specific depth... and on the other hand suggesting that your eyes will do it naturally, even if for a split second... and then trying to claim some wonderful "intuition" by which people actually do recognise the "hidden" pattern.
There is no uniqueness of concept here.
There is no precognition here.
Precognition means knowing something BEFORE it happens.
It also doesn't mean "on the basis of probability we expect X to happen" - but you need to KNOW something happens and know it BEFORE it happens.
Merely interpreting an auto-stereogram is not, in any way, precognition.
Is it even "intuition"... no, for while
you might not appreciate or understand how it happens, there is a logical and rationale explanation - as explained above.
Dressing it up as intuition, therefore, in my view is mere charlatanism.
Either put up or shut up, Kwhilborn.
Simples.